Financial market regulation and private law: a new frontier of transnational commercial law

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Josef Wittmann
{"title":"Financial market regulation and private law: a new frontier of transnational commercial law","authors":"Josef Wittmann","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unae003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Global financial markets are among the most extensively regulated markets in the world economy. This poses significant challenges from a private law perspective when regulatory rules interfere with private rights and obligations. This article examines the potential of transnational commercial law (TCL) to provide for a private law framework suited to the regulatory reality in global financial markets. The article finds that, while regulatory aspects are generally excluded from TCL instruments, notable exceptions to this general rule occur. Based on an analysis of the approaches undertaken in the Unidroit Convention of Substantive Rules for Intermediated Securities (Geneva Convention), including the accompanying Legislative Guide, the Unidroit Principles on the Operation of Close-Out Netting Provisions and the UNCITRAL Model Law on Secured Transactions, the article maps out three methods that allow for a reconciliation of private and regulatory rules: (i) the adoption of a flexible private law system including default and conflict rules; (ii) the use of opening clauses to allow deviations from TCL rules in accordance with international regulatory standards; and (iii) a codificatory approach through the development of a comprehensive and systematic legal framework consisting of both private law and regulatory rules. Finally, the article addresses potential obstacles and objections that future TCL instruments will face when addressing regulatory aspects. Overall, the article argues that an efficient financial market requires a foreseeable set of private law rules that—considering the continuous expansion of regulatory law—must address the pressing issues deriving from the interrelation of regulation and private law. However, the adaption of TCL instruments should be limited to common-sense financial market regulation that, even if differing from State to State, generally follows globally shared regulatory goals.","PeriodicalId":42756,"journal":{"name":"Uniform Law Review","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uniform Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unae003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global financial markets are among the most extensively regulated markets in the world economy. This poses significant challenges from a private law perspective when regulatory rules interfere with private rights and obligations. This article examines the potential of transnational commercial law (TCL) to provide for a private law framework suited to the regulatory reality in global financial markets. The article finds that, while regulatory aspects are generally excluded from TCL instruments, notable exceptions to this general rule occur. Based on an analysis of the approaches undertaken in the Unidroit Convention of Substantive Rules for Intermediated Securities (Geneva Convention), including the accompanying Legislative Guide, the Unidroit Principles on the Operation of Close-Out Netting Provisions and the UNCITRAL Model Law on Secured Transactions, the article maps out three methods that allow for a reconciliation of private and regulatory rules: (i) the adoption of a flexible private law system including default and conflict rules; (ii) the use of opening clauses to allow deviations from TCL rules in accordance with international regulatory standards; and (iii) a codificatory approach through the development of a comprehensive and systematic legal framework consisting of both private law and regulatory rules. Finally, the article addresses potential obstacles and objections that future TCL instruments will face when addressing regulatory aspects. Overall, the article argues that an efficient financial market requires a foreseeable set of private law rules that—considering the continuous expansion of regulatory law—must address the pressing issues deriving from the interrelation of regulation and private law. However, the adaption of TCL instruments should be limited to common-sense financial market regulation that, even if differing from State to State, generally follows globally shared regulatory goals.
金融市场监管和私法:跨国商法的新领域
全球金融市场是世界经济中受到最广泛监管的市场之一。当监管规则干扰私人权利和义务时,从私法的角度来看,这就构成了重大挑战。本文探讨了跨国商法(TCL)提供适合全球金融市场监管现实的私法框架的潜力。文章发现,虽然监管方面通常被排除在 TCL 文书之外,但这一一般规则也有明显的例外。基于对《统法协会中介证券实体规则公约》(《日内瓦公约》)(包括随附的《立法指南》)、《统法协会平仓净额结算条款操作原则》和《贸易法委员会担保交易示范法》所采取的方法的分析,文章列出了可以协调私法规则和监管规则的三种方法:(i)采用灵活的私法体系,包括违约和冲突规则;(ii)根据国际监管标准使用开放条款,允许偏离 TCL 规则;(iii)通过制定由私法和监管规则组成的全面系统的法律框架,采用编纂方法。最后,文章讨论了未来的 TCL 文书在处理监管问题时可能面临的障碍和反对意见。总之,文章认为,高效的金融市场需要一套可预见的私法规则,考虑到监管法的不断扩展,这套规则必须解决监管与私法相互关系中产生的紧迫问题。然而,对 TCL 工具的调整应仅限于常识性的金融市场监管,即使各国的情况不同,但一般都遵循全球共同的监管目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信