Protocol for an interview-based method for mapping mental models using causal-loop diagramming and realist interviewing

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Erin S. Kenzie , Wayne Wakeland , Antonie Jetter , Kristen Hassmiller Lich , Mellodie Seater , Rose Gunn , Melinda M. Davis
{"title":"Protocol for an interview-based method for mapping mental models using causal-loop diagramming and realist interviewing","authors":"Erin S. Kenzie ,&nbsp;Wayne Wakeland ,&nbsp;Antonie Jetter ,&nbsp;Kristen Hassmiller Lich ,&nbsp;Mellodie Seater ,&nbsp;Rose Gunn ,&nbsp;Melinda M. Davis","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Causal-loop diagramming, a method from system dynamics, is increasingly used in evaluation to describe individuals’ understanding of how policies or programs do or could work (\"mental models\"). The use of qualitative interviews to inform model development is common, but guidance for how to design and conduct these interviews to elicit causal information in participant mental models is scant. A key strength of semi-structured qualitative interviews is that they let participants speak freely; they are not, however, designed to elicit causal information. Moreover, much of human communication about mental models—particularly larger causal structures such as feedback loops—is implicit. In qualitative research, part of the skill and art of effective interviewing and analysis involves listening for information that is expressed implicitly. Similarly, a skilled facilitator can recognize and inquire about implied causal structures, as is commonly done in group model building. To standardize and make accessible these approaches, we have formalized a protocol for designing and conducting semi-structured interviews tailored to eliciting mental models using causal-loop diagramming. We build on qualitative research methods, system dynamics, and realist interviewing. This novel, integrative method is designed to increase transparency and rigor in the use of interviews for system dynamics and has a variety of potential applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Causal-loop diagramming, a method from system dynamics, is increasingly used in evaluation to describe individuals’ understanding of how policies or programs do or could work ("mental models"). The use of qualitative interviews to inform model development is common, but guidance for how to design and conduct these interviews to elicit causal information in participant mental models is scant. A key strength of semi-structured qualitative interviews is that they let participants speak freely; they are not, however, designed to elicit causal information. Moreover, much of human communication about mental models—particularly larger causal structures such as feedback loops—is implicit. In qualitative research, part of the skill and art of effective interviewing and analysis involves listening for information that is expressed implicitly. Similarly, a skilled facilitator can recognize and inquire about implied causal structures, as is commonly done in group model building. To standardize and make accessible these approaches, we have formalized a protocol for designing and conducting semi-structured interviews tailored to eliciting mental models using causal-loop diagramming. We build on qualitative research methods, system dynamics, and realist interviewing. This novel, integrative method is designed to increase transparency and rigor in the use of interviews for system dynamics and has a variety of potential applications.

利用因果循环图法和现实主义访谈法绘制心智模式的访谈方法规程
因果循环图法是系统动力学的一种方法,在评估中越来越多地被用来描述个人对政 策或项目如何或可能如何运作的理解("心智模型")。使用定性访谈来为模型开发提供信息是很常见的,但如何设计和进行这些访谈以获取参与者心智模型中的因果信息却缺乏指导。半结构式定性访谈的一个主要优点是让参与者畅所欲言,但其目的并不是为了获取因果信息。此外,人类关于心智模型的交流--尤其是较大的因果结构,如反馈回路--大多是隐含的。在定性研究中,有效访谈和分析的技巧和艺术之一就是倾听隐含的信息。同样,熟练的引导者也能识别并询问隐含的因果结构,这在小组模型构建中很常见。为了使这些方法标准化并便于使用,我们已经正式制定了一个协议,用于设计和进行半结构式访谈,以使用因果循环图来激发心智模型。我们以定性研究方法、系统动力学和现实主义访谈为基础。这种新颖的综合方法旨在提高系统动力学访谈的透明度和严谨性,并具有多种潜在应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信