Variation in Defining Retention After Onabotulinum Toxin A for Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.) Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001460
Peris R Castaneda, Andrew Chen, Paige Kuhlmann, Jennifer T Anger, Karyn S Eilber
{"title":"Variation in Defining Retention After Onabotulinum Toxin A for Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Peris R Castaneda, Andrew Chen, Paige Kuhlmann, Jennifer T Anger, Karyn S Eilber","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Urinary retention is a common adverse effect after intravesical injection of onabotulinum toxin A (BTX) for overactive bladder (OAB). Reported retention rates range from 1.6% to more than 40%. This variation may be due to varying definitions of retention in the literature.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess the variation in definitions of urinary retention across studies of BTX for the treatment of OAB.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We performed a systematic review of studies of BTX for OAB by querying MEDLINE and EMBASE according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We included original research studies on adults with overactive bladder treated with BTX and urinary retention reported as an outcome from January 2000 to December 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 954 results, we identified 53 articles that met inclusion criteria. There were 6 definitions for urinary retention. The majority of studies (60.4%) reported initiating clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) as the metric for retention. Five (9.5%) studies provided no definition despite reporting retention as an adverse event. Twenty studies (37.7%) specified a postvoid residual volume (PVR) threshold for initiating CIC in asymptomatic patients; 19 (35.8%) specified a PVR threshold for CIC in symptomatic patients. The PVR thresholds ranged from 100 to 400 mL. Twenty-three studies (43.4%) did not address asymptomatic elevation of PVR, and 22 (41.5%) did not address how symptomatic patients were managed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Urinary retention after BTX injection is inconsistently defined in the literature. Lack of standardization in reporting retention after intravesical BTX prevents accurate assessment of the risk of urinary retention and comparison of outcomes between studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Urinary retention is a common adverse effect after intravesical injection of onabotulinum toxin A (BTX) for overactive bladder (OAB). Reported retention rates range from 1.6% to more than 40%. This variation may be due to varying definitions of retention in the literature.

Objective: We aimed to assess the variation in definitions of urinary retention across studies of BTX for the treatment of OAB.

Study design: We performed a systematic review of studies of BTX for OAB by querying MEDLINE and EMBASE according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We included original research studies on adults with overactive bladder treated with BTX and urinary retention reported as an outcome from January 2000 to December 2020.

Results: From 954 results, we identified 53 articles that met inclusion criteria. There were 6 definitions for urinary retention. The majority of studies (60.4%) reported initiating clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) as the metric for retention. Five (9.5%) studies provided no definition despite reporting retention as an adverse event. Twenty studies (37.7%) specified a postvoid residual volume (PVR) threshold for initiating CIC in asymptomatic patients; 19 (35.8%) specified a PVR threshold for CIC in symptomatic patients. The PVR thresholds ranged from 100 to 400 mL. Twenty-three studies (43.4%) did not address asymptomatic elevation of PVR, and 22 (41.5%) did not address how symptomatic patients were managed.

Conclusions: Urinary retention after BTX injection is inconsistently defined in the literature. Lack of standardization in reporting retention after intravesical BTX prevents accurate assessment of the risk of urinary retention and comparison of outcomes between studies.

奥诺布林毒素 A 治疗膀胱过度活动症后潴留定义的差异:系统性综述。
重要性:尿潴留是膀胱内注射奥博毒素 A(BTX)治疗膀胱过度活动症(OAB)后常见的不良反应。报告的尿潴留率从 1.6% 到 40% 以上不等。造成这种差异的原因可能是文献中对潴留的定义各不相同:我们旨在评估BTX治疗OAB研究中尿潴留定义的差异:研究设计:我们根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南,通过查询 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE,对 BTX 治疗 OAB 的研究进行了系统综述。我们收录了 2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间关于成人膀胱过度活动症患者接受 BTX 治疗的原始研究,并将尿潴留作为一项结果进行了报告:从 954 项结果中,我们确定了 53 篇符合纳入标准的文章。尿潴留有 6 种定义。大多数研究(60.4%)将开始清洁间歇导尿术(CIC)作为衡量尿潴留的标准。五项研究(9.5%)尽管将尿潴留报告为不良事件,但未提供任何定义。20 项研究(37.7%)规定了无症状患者启动 CIC 的排卵后残余容积 (PVR) 阈值;19 项研究(35.8%)规定了有症状患者 CIC 的 PVR 阈值。PVR 阈值从 100 毫升到 400 毫升不等。23项研究(43.4%)未涉及无症状的PVR升高,22项研究(41.5%)未涉及如何处理无症状患者:结论:文献中对注射 BTX 后尿潴留的定义并不一致。结论:文献中对 BTX 注射后尿潴留的定义不一致,膀胱内 BTX 注射后尿潴留的报告缺乏标准化,因此无法准确评估尿潴留的风险,也无法比较不同研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信