COI works both ways: Investigation of misconduct by an independent research integrity organization is the way to go.

IF 4 1区哲学 Q1 MEDICAL ETHICS

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-10 DOI:10.1080/08989621.2024.2328595

Bor Luen Tang

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resnik, Hosseini and Rasmussen's take on universities having conflict of interest (COI), and should engage an independent research integrity organization in investigating research misconduct (RM) allegations against top officials, is prudent and timely. COI could be conceived either against or for in the processes toward the conviction of a respondent. For the latter, we need look no further than another recent Harvard case involving Francesca Gino.

查看原文本刊更多论文

COI 双管齐下：由独立的研究诚信组织对不当行为进行调查是一种好方法。

Resnik、Hosseini 和 Rasmussen 认为，大学存在利益冲突 (COI)，应该让独立的研究诚信组织参与调查针对高层官员的研究不当行为 (RM) 指控，这一观点既审慎又及时。在对被告定罪的过程中，COI 既可以被认为是不利的，也可以被认为是有利的。对于后者，我们只需看看哈佛大学最近另一起涉及 Francesca Gino 的案件。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance MEDICAL ETHICS-

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

14.70%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance is devoted to the examination and critical analysis of systems for maximizing integrity in the conduct of research. It provides an interdisciplinary, international forum for the development of ethics, procedures, standards policies, and concepts to encourage the ethical conduct of research and to enhance the validity of research results. The journal welcomes views on advancing the integrity of research in the fields of general and multidisciplinary sciences, medicine, law, economics, statistics, management studies, public policy, politics, sociology, history, psychology, philosophy, ethics, and information science. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees.