Higher Neck Pain Intensity and Pain Catastrophizing Soon After A Whiplash Injury Partially Explain the Presence of Persistent Headache: A Prospective Study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Ernesto Anarte-Lazo, Deborah Falla, Cleofas Rodriguez-Blanco, Carlos Bernal-Utrera
{"title":"Higher Neck Pain Intensity and Pain Catastrophizing Soon After A Whiplash Injury Partially Explain the Presence of Persistent Headache: A Prospective Study.","authors":"Ernesto Anarte-Lazo, Deborah Falla, Cleofas Rodriguez-Blanco, Carlos Bernal-Utrera","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand whether pain-related factors soon after a whiplash injury can explain the presence of chronic headache.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective study with a follow-up of 6 months was performed, including 42 patients with acute whiplash-associated disorders. Neck pain intensity, the Neck Disability Index, the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and the Anxiety State-Trait Scale were assessed at baseline. Differences in clinical characteristics between those with and without headache at 6 months were determined. The relative risk of presenting with headache was evaluated. A logistic regression model was performed to assess which factors at baseline could explain the presence of headache at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 6 months, one-third of the sample presented with chronic headache. Significant differences were found for several outcome measures when people with and without headache were compared ( P <0.001). The highest relative risk of presenting with headache was found for moderate/severe levels of pain catastrophizing during the acute phase (RR=15.00, 95% CI=3.93, 57.22). The level of neck pain intensity and pain catastrophizing at baseline partially explained the presence of headache at 6 months ( R2 =0.627).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The risk of presenting with persistent headache attributed to a whiplash injury is increased when people present with higher neck pain intensity and pain catastrophizing soon after a whiplash injury. Evaluating neck pain intensity and pain catastrophizing at baseline may assist in identifying those more likely to develop chronic headache, potentially providing an opportunity for early targeted interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"349-355"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001209","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To understand whether pain-related factors soon after a whiplash injury can explain the presence of chronic headache.

Materials and methods: A prospective study with a follow-up of 6 months was performed, including 42 patients with acute whiplash-associated disorders. Neck pain intensity, the Neck Disability Index, the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and the Anxiety State-Trait Scale were assessed at baseline. Differences in clinical characteristics between those with and without headache at 6 months were determined. The relative risk of presenting with headache was evaluated. A logistic regression model was performed to assess which factors at baseline could explain the presence of headache at 6 months.

Results: At 6 months, one-third of the sample presented with chronic headache. Significant differences were found for several outcome measures when people with and without headache were compared ( P <0.001). The highest relative risk of presenting with headache was found for moderate/severe levels of pain catastrophizing during the acute phase (RR=15.00, 95% CI=3.93, 57.22). The level of neck pain intensity and pain catastrophizing at baseline partially explained the presence of headache at 6 months ( R2 =0.627).

Discussion: The risk of presenting with persistent headache attributed to a whiplash injury is increased when people present with higher neck pain intensity and pain catastrophizing soon after a whiplash injury. Evaluating neck pain intensity and pain catastrophizing at baseline may assist in identifying those more likely to develop chronic headache, potentially providing an opportunity for early targeted interventions.

颈部疼痛强度较高和颈部闪挫伤后不久疼痛加重可部分解释持续性头痛的存在:一项前瞻性研究
摘要了解与疼痛相关的因素是否能解释鞭打伤后不久出现的慢性头痛:对 42 名急性鞭打相关疾病患者进行了为期 6 个月的前瞻性研究。基线评估包括颈部疼痛强度、颈部残疾指数、坦帕运动恐怖量表、疼痛灾难化量表和焦虑状态-特质量表。在 6 个月时,确定了有头痛和无头痛患者的临床特征差异。评估了出现头痛的相对风险。采用逻辑回归模型评估基线时的哪些因素可以解释 6 个月时是否存在头痛:结果:6 个月时,1/3 的样本出现慢性头痛。将有头痛和没有头痛的人进行比较,发现在几项结果指标上存在显著差异(讨论:如果颈部疼痛强度和疼痛灾难化程度较高,那么在颈部受到鞭打伤害后不久出现持续性头痛的风险就会增加。在基线时评估颈部疼痛强度和疼痛灾难化程度可能有助于确定哪些人更有可能患上慢性头痛,从而为早期有针对性的干预提供机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Journal of Pain
Clinical Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Clinical Journal of Pain explores all aspects of pain and its effective treatment, bringing readers the insights of leading anesthesiologists, surgeons, internists, neurologists, orthopedists, psychiatrists and psychologists, clinical pharmacologists, and rehabilitation medicine specialists. This peer-reviewed journal presents timely and thought-provoking articles on clinical dilemmas in pain management; valuable diagnostic procedures; promising new pharmacological, surgical, and other therapeutic modalities; psychosocial dimensions of pain; and ethical issues of concern to all medical professionals. The journal also publishes Special Topic issues on subjects of particular relevance to the practice of pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信