The role of transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) following peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): A pilot, prospective, patient-driven study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-11 DOI:10.4103/sjg.sjg_22_24
Fares Ayoub, Tara Keihanian, Noor Zabad, Salmaan Jawaid, Kalpesh Patel, Mohamed O Othman
{"title":"The role of transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) following peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): A pilot, prospective, patient-driven study.","authors":"Fares Ayoub, Tara Keihanian, Noor Zabad, Salmaan Jawaid, Kalpesh Patel, Mohamed O Othman","doi":"10.4103/sjg.sjg_22_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) is a concern after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) has been recently described as a possible therapy for post-POEM GERD in case series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively enrolled patients undergoing POEM who agreed to participate in objective post-procedure GERD evaluation. Patients with objective evidence of GERD and suitable anatomy were offered TIF vs. proton pump inhibitor (PPI) only. Patients who underwent TIF were compared to those on PPI-only therapy after follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 21 enrolled POEM patients with objective testing, GERD was found in 11 (52%). Of those eligible for TIF, 4 (40%) opted to pursue TIF and were compared to those on PPI-only therapy ( n = 6). Three months post-TIF, 75% of patients had discontinued or significantly decreased PPI. There were no adverse events. GERD health-related quality of life scores were low and comparable between TIF (3.75 ± 6.2) and those who remained on PPI-only therapy (4.1 ± 5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this pilot, patient-driven prospective study, 75% of patients with post-POEM GERD undergoing TIF had stopped or significantly reduced PPI use. Post-POEM TIF is safe and effective and may be a viable alternative to PPI for POEM-related GERD; however, future studies should include a control arm and post-intervention pH monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":48881,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjg.sjg_22_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) is a concern after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) has been recently described as a possible therapy for post-POEM GERD in case series.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients undergoing POEM who agreed to participate in objective post-procedure GERD evaluation. Patients with objective evidence of GERD and suitable anatomy were offered TIF vs. proton pump inhibitor (PPI) only. Patients who underwent TIF were compared to those on PPI-only therapy after follow-up.

Results: Of 21 enrolled POEM patients with objective testing, GERD was found in 11 (52%). Of those eligible for TIF, 4 (40%) opted to pursue TIF and were compared to those on PPI-only therapy ( n = 6). Three months post-TIF, 75% of patients had discontinued or significantly decreased PPI. There were no adverse events. GERD health-related quality of life scores were low and comparable between TIF (3.75 ± 6.2) and those who remained on PPI-only therapy (4.1 ± 5).

Conclusion: In this pilot, patient-driven prospective study, 75% of patients with post-POEM GERD undergoing TIF had stopped or significantly reduced PPI use. Post-POEM TIF is safe and effective and may be a viable alternative to PPI for POEM-related GERD; however, future studies should include a control arm and post-intervention pH monitoring.

经口无切口胃底折叠术(TIF)在口腔内窥镜肌切开术(POEM)后胃食管反流病(GERD)治疗中的作用:一项由患者主导的前瞻性试点研究。
背景:胃食管反流(GERD)是口周内窥镜肌切开术(POEM)后的一个令人担忧的问题。最近,经口无切口胃底折叠术(TIF)被描述为治疗 POEM 术后胃食管反流病的一种可能疗法:我们前瞻性地招募了同意参加术后胃食管反流客观评估的 POEM 患者。有胃食管反流病客观证据且解剖结构合适的患者接受 TIF 与仅接受质子泵抑制剂 (PPI) 治疗。对接受 TIF 治疗的患者与仅接受 PPI 治疗的患者进行随访比较:在 21 名接受客观检测的 POEM 患者中,有 11 人(52%)被发现患有胃食管反流病。在符合 TIF 条件的患者中,有 4 人(40%)选择了 TIF,并与只接受 PPI 治疗的患者(n = 6)进行了比较。TIF 术后三个月,75% 的患者停用或显著减少了 PPI。无不良事件发生。胃食管反流病健康相关生活质量评分较低,TIF(3.75±6.2)分与仍在接受单纯 PPI 治疗的患者(4.1±5)分相当:在这项以患者为主导的前瞻性试点研究中,75% 接受 TIF 治疗的 POEM 后胃食管反流病患者已停止或显著减少了 PPI 的使用。POEM后TIF安全有效,可作为PPI治疗POEM相关胃食管反流病的可行替代方案;不过,未来的研究应包括对照组和干预后pH值监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: The Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology (SJG) is an open access peer-reviewed publication. Authors are invited to submit articles in the field of gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition, with a wide spectrum of coverage including basic science, epidemiology, diagnostics, therapeutics, public health, and standards of health care in relation to the concerned specialty. Review articles are usually by invitation. However review articles of current interest and a high standard of scientific value could also be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信