Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin vs Aspirin Alone in Patients With Acute Mild to Moderate Stroke: The ATAMIS Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hui-Sheng Chen, Yu Cui, Xin-Hong Wang, Yu-Tong Ma, Jing Han, Ying-Jie Duan, Jiang Lu, Li-Ying Shen, Yong Liang, Wei-Zhong Wang, Hui Wang, Yong Zhao, Jin-Tao Zhang, Yu-Lin Song, Xiao-Mei He, Run-Hui Li, Ding-Bo Tao, Jing Li, Shu-Man Huang, Ni Wang, Mei Hong, Chong Meng, Wei Zhang, Duo-Lao Wang, Thanh N Nguyen
{"title":"Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin vs Aspirin Alone in Patients With Acute Mild to Moderate Stroke: The ATAMIS Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Hui-Sheng Chen, Yu Cui, Xin-Hong Wang, Yu-Tong Ma, Jing Han, Ying-Jie Duan, Jiang Lu, Li-Ying Shen, Yong Liang, Wei-Zhong Wang, Hui Wang, Yong Zhao, Jin-Tao Zhang, Yu-Lin Song, Xiao-Mei He, Run-Hui Li, Ding-Bo Tao, Jing Li, Shu-Man Huang, Ni Wang, Mei Hong, Chong Meng, Wei Zhang, Duo-Lao Wang, Thanh N Nguyen","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Dual antiplatelet therapy has been demonstrated to be superior to single antiplatelet in reducing recurrent stroke among patients with transient ischemic attack or minor stroke, but robust evidence for its effect in patients with mild to moderate ischemic stroke is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether dual antiplatelet therapy is superior to single antiplatelet among patients with mild to moderate ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This was a multicenter, open-label, blinded end point, randomized clinical trial conducted at 66 hospitals in China from December 20, 2016, through August 9, 2022. The date of final follow-up was October 30, 2022. The analysis was reported on March 12, 2023. Of 3065 patients with ischemic stroke, 3000 patients with acute mild to moderate stroke within 48 hours of symptom onset were enrolled, after excluding 65 patients who did not meet eligibility criteria or had no randomization outcome.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Within 48 hours after symptom onset, patients were randomly assigned to receive clopidogrel plus aspirin (n = 1541) or aspirin alone (n = 1459) in a 1:1 ratio.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary end point was early neurologic deterioration at 7 days, defined as an increase of 2 or more points in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, but not as a result of cerebral hemorrhage, compared with baseline. The superiority of clopidogrel plus aspirin to aspirin alone was assessed based on a modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomized participants with at least 1 efficacy evaluation regardless of treatment allocation. Bleeding events were safety end points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3000 randomized patients, 1942 (64.6%) were men, the mean (SD) age was 65.9 (10.6) years, median (IQR) NIHSS score at admission was 5 (4-6), and 1830 (61.0%) had a stroke of undetermined cause. A total of 2915 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Early neurologic deterioration occurred in 72 of 1502 (4.8%) in the dual antiplatelet therapy group vs 95 of 1413 (6.7%) in the aspirin alone group (risk difference -1.9%; 95% CI, -3.6 to -0.2; P = .03). Similar bleeding events were found between 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Among Chinese patients with acute mild to moderate ischemic stroke, clopidogrel plus aspirin was superior to aspirin alone with regard to reducing early neurologic deterioration at 7 days with similar safety profile. These findings indicate that dual antiplatelet therapy may be a superior choice to aspirin alone in treating patients with acute mild to moderate stroke.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02869009.</p>","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10928538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0146","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Dual antiplatelet therapy has been demonstrated to be superior to single antiplatelet in reducing recurrent stroke among patients with transient ischemic attack or minor stroke, but robust evidence for its effect in patients with mild to moderate ischemic stroke is lacking.

Objective: To evaluate whether dual antiplatelet therapy is superior to single antiplatelet among patients with mild to moderate ischemic stroke.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a multicenter, open-label, blinded end point, randomized clinical trial conducted at 66 hospitals in China from December 20, 2016, through August 9, 2022. The date of final follow-up was October 30, 2022. The analysis was reported on March 12, 2023. Of 3065 patients with ischemic stroke, 3000 patients with acute mild to moderate stroke within 48 hours of symptom onset were enrolled, after excluding 65 patients who did not meet eligibility criteria or had no randomization outcome.

Interventions: Within 48 hours after symptom onset, patients were randomly assigned to receive clopidogrel plus aspirin (n = 1541) or aspirin alone (n = 1459) in a 1:1 ratio.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was early neurologic deterioration at 7 days, defined as an increase of 2 or more points in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, but not as a result of cerebral hemorrhage, compared with baseline. The superiority of clopidogrel plus aspirin to aspirin alone was assessed based on a modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomized participants with at least 1 efficacy evaluation regardless of treatment allocation. Bleeding events were safety end points.

Results: Of the 3000 randomized patients, 1942 (64.6%) were men, the mean (SD) age was 65.9 (10.6) years, median (IQR) NIHSS score at admission was 5 (4-6), and 1830 (61.0%) had a stroke of undetermined cause. A total of 2915 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Early neurologic deterioration occurred in 72 of 1502 (4.8%) in the dual antiplatelet therapy group vs 95 of 1413 (6.7%) in the aspirin alone group (risk difference -1.9%; 95% CI, -3.6 to -0.2; P = .03). Similar bleeding events were found between 2 groups.

Conclusions and relevance: Among Chinese patients with acute mild to moderate ischemic stroke, clopidogrel plus aspirin was superior to aspirin alone with regard to reducing early neurologic deterioration at 7 days with similar safety profile. These findings indicate that dual antiplatelet therapy may be a superior choice to aspirin alone in treating patients with acute mild to moderate stroke.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02869009.

急性轻度至中度卒中患者服用氯吡格雷加阿司匹林与单用阿司匹林的对比:ATAMIS 随机临床试验。
重要性:在减少短暂性脑缺血发作或轻微脑卒中患者中风复发方面,双联抗血小板疗法优于单联抗血小板疗法,但在轻度至中度缺血性脑卒中患者中,双联抗血小板疗法的效果尚缺乏有力证据:目的:评估在轻度至中度缺血性卒中患者中,双重抗血小板疗法是否优于单一抗血小板疗法:这是一项多中心、开放标签、盲法终点、随机临床试验,于2016年12月20日至2022年8月9日在中国66家医院进行。最终随访日期为 2022 年 10 月 30 日。分析报告于 2023 年 3 月 12 日发布。在3065名缺血性脑卒中患者中,有3000名在症状出现48小时内的急性轻度至中度脑卒中患者入选,排除了65名不符合资格标准或没有随机结果的患者:在症状出现后 48 小时内,按 1:1 的比例随机分配患者接受氯吡格雷加阿司匹林治疗(n = 1541)或单独接受阿司匹林治疗(n = 1459):主要终点是7天后的早期神经功能恶化,即与基线相比,美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分增加2分或2分以上,但不是因为脑出血。氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林优于单用阿司匹林的评估基于修改后的意向治疗人群,该人群包括所有接受过至少一次疗效评估的随机参与者,无论治疗分配如何。出血事件为安全性终点:在 3000 名随机患者中,1942 人(64.6%)为男性,平均(SD)年龄为 65.9(10.6)岁,入院时 NIHSS 评分中位数(IQR)为 5(4-6)分,1830 人(61.0%)卒中原因不明。共有 2915 名患者纳入了修改后的意向治疗分析。双联抗血小板疗法组 1502 例中有 72 例(4.8%)发生早期神经功能恶化,而单用阿司匹林组 1413 例中有 95 例(6.7%)发生早期神经功能恶化(风险差异-1.9%;95% CI,-3.6 至-0.2;P = .03)。两组间的出血事件相似:在中国急性轻度至中度缺血性脑卒中患者中,氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林在减少7天早期神经功能恶化方面优于单用阿司匹林,且安全性相似。这些研究结果表明,在治疗急性轻度至中度中风患者时,双联抗血小板疗法可能是优于单用阿司匹林的选择:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT02869009。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA neurology
JAMA neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JAMA Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal for physicians caring for people with neurologic disorders and those interested in the structure and function of the normal and diseased nervous system. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry began publication in 1919 and, in 1959, became 2 separate journals: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, their names changed to JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Neurology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信