Outcomes of care during the last month of life: a systematic review to inform the development of a core outcome set.

4区 医学 Q2 Nursing
Annals of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-07 DOI:10.21037/apm-23-435
Valentina González-Jaramillo, Nora Luethi, Martina Egloff, Zayne M Roa-Díaz, Nathalia González-Jaramillo, Catalina Díaz-Ríos, Andri Christen-Cevallos Rosero, Susanna Dodd, Steffen Eychmüller, Sofía C Zambrano
{"title":"Outcomes of care during the last month of life: a systematic review to inform the development of a core outcome set.","authors":"Valentina González-Jaramillo, Nora Luethi, Martina Egloff, Zayne M Roa-Díaz, Nathalia González-Jaramillo, Catalina Díaz-Ríos, Andri Christen-Cevallos Rosero, Susanna Dodd, Steffen Eychmüller, Sofía C Zambrano","doi":"10.21037/apm-23-435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To date, there is a lack of standardization and consensus on which outcomes are central to assess the care provided to patients in the last month of life. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a systematic review to identify relevant outcomes to inform the development of a core outcome set for the best care for the dying person.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of outcomes reported in the scientific literature about the care for the dying person in the last month of life. We searched for peer-reviewed studies published before February 2022 in four electronic databases. To categorise the outcomes, we employed the taxonomy developed by the \"Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials\" collaboration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 2,933 articles retrieved, 619 were included for analyses. The majority of studies (71%) were retrospective and with data extracted from chart reviews (71%). We extracted 1,951 outcomes in total, from which, after deletion of repeated outcomes, we identified 256 unique ones. The most frequently assessed outcomes were those related to medication or therapeutic interventions and those to hospital/healthcare use. Outcomes related to psychosocial wellbeing were rarely assessed. The closer to death, the less frequently the outcomes were studied.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most outcomes were related to medical interventions or to hospital use. Only a few studies focused on other components of integrated care such as psychosocial aspects. It remains to be defined which of these outcomes are fundamental to achieve the best care for the dying.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"627-640"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-23-435","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To date, there is a lack of standardization and consensus on which outcomes are central to assess the care provided to patients in the last month of life. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a systematic review to identify relevant outcomes to inform the development of a core outcome set for the best care for the dying person.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of outcomes reported in the scientific literature about the care for the dying person in the last month of life. We searched for peer-reviewed studies published before February 2022 in four electronic databases. To categorise the outcomes, we employed the taxonomy developed by the "Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials" collaboration.

Results: Out of the 2,933 articles retrieved, 619 were included for analyses. The majority of studies (71%) were retrospective and with data extracted from chart reviews (71%). We extracted 1,951 outcomes in total, from which, after deletion of repeated outcomes, we identified 256 unique ones. The most frequently assessed outcomes were those related to medication or therapeutic interventions and those to hospital/healthcare use. Outcomes related to psychosocial wellbeing were rarely assessed. The closer to death, the less frequently the outcomes were studied.

Conclusions: Most outcomes were related to medical interventions or to hospital use. Only a few studies focused on other components of integrated care such as psychosocial aspects. It remains to be defined which of these outcomes are fundamental to achieve the best care for the dying.

生命最后一个月的护理结果:为制定核心结果集提供信息的系统性回顾。
背景:迄今为止,在评估生命最后一个月为患者提供的护理时,哪些结果是核心结果尚缺乏标准化和共识。因此,我们旨在开展一项系统性综述,以确定相关结果,为制定临终病人最佳护理的核心结果集提供依据:我们对科学文献中报道的生命最后一个月的临终关怀结果进行了系统性回顾。我们在四个电子数据库中搜索了 2022 年 2 月之前发表的同行评审研究。为了对结果进行分类,我们采用了 "有效性试验中的核心结果测量 "合作组织制定的分类标准:在检索到的 2,933 篇文章中,有 619 篇被纳入分析。大多数研究(71%)为回顾性研究,数据提取自图表回顾(71%)。我们共提取了 1951 项结果,在删除重复结果后,我们从中确定了 256 项独特的结果。最常评估的结果是与药物或治疗干预相关的结果,以及与医院/医疗机构使用情况相关的结果。与社会心理健康相关的结果很少被评估。越接近死亡,对结果的研究就越少:大多数结果与医疗干预或医院使用有关。结论:大多数结果与医疗干预或医院使用有关,只有少数研究关注综合护理的其他组成部分,如社会心理方面。这些结果中哪些是实现临终关怀的根本,还有待明确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of palliative medicine
Annals of palliative medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
231
期刊介绍: Annals of Palliative Medicine (Ann Palliat Med; Print ISSN 2224-5820; Online ISSN 2224-5839) is an open access, international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly with both online and printed copies since 2012. The aim of the journal is to provide up-to-date and cutting-edge information and professional support for health care providers in palliative medicine disciplines to improve the quality of life for patients and their families and caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信