Artificial intelligence research: A review on dominant themes, methods, frameworks and future research directions

Kingsley Ofosu-Ampong
{"title":"Artificial intelligence research: A review on dominant themes, methods, frameworks and future research directions","authors":"Kingsley Ofosu-Ampong","doi":"10.1016/j.teler.2024.100127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article presents an analysis of artificial intelligence (AI) in information systems and innovation-related journals to determine the current issues and stock of knowledge in AI literature, research methodology, frameworks, level of analysis and conceptual approaches. By doing this, the article aims to identify research gaps that can guide future investigations. A total of 85 peer-reviewed articles from 2020 to 2023 were used in the analysis. The findings show that extant literature is skewed towards the prevalence of technological issues and highlights the relatively lower focus on other themes, such as contextual knowledge co-creation issues, conceptualisation, and application domains. While there have been increasing technological issues with artificial intelligence, the three identified areas of security concern are data security, model security and network security. Furthermore, the review found that contemporary AI, which continually drives the boundaries of computational capabilities to tackle increasingly intricate decision-making challenges, distinguishes itself from earlier iterations in two primary aspects that significantly affect organisational learning in dealing with AI's potential: autonomy and learnability. This study contributes to AI research by providing insights into current issues, research methodology, level of analysis and conceptual approaches, and AI framework to help identify research gaps for future investigations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101213,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics Reports","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772503024000136/pdfft?md5=ff23dd49ab08767e77b9ba3762c2982c&pid=1-s2.0-S2772503024000136-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772503024000136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of artificial intelligence (AI) in information systems and innovation-related journals to determine the current issues and stock of knowledge in AI literature, research methodology, frameworks, level of analysis and conceptual approaches. By doing this, the article aims to identify research gaps that can guide future investigations. A total of 85 peer-reviewed articles from 2020 to 2023 were used in the analysis. The findings show that extant literature is skewed towards the prevalence of technological issues and highlights the relatively lower focus on other themes, such as contextual knowledge co-creation issues, conceptualisation, and application domains. While there have been increasing technological issues with artificial intelligence, the three identified areas of security concern are data security, model security and network security. Furthermore, the review found that contemporary AI, which continually drives the boundaries of computational capabilities to tackle increasingly intricate decision-making challenges, distinguishes itself from earlier iterations in two primary aspects that significantly affect organisational learning in dealing with AI's potential: autonomy and learnability. This study contributes to AI research by providing insights into current issues, research methodology, level of analysis and conceptual approaches, and AI framework to help identify research gaps for future investigations.

人工智能研究:关于主要主题、方法、框架和未来研究方向的综述
本文对信息系统和创新相关期刊中的人工智能(AI)进行了分析,以确定当前人工智能文献中的问题和知识储备、研究方法、框架、分析水平和概念方法。文章旨在通过这一方法找出研究空白,为今后的研究工作提供指导。分析共使用了 85 篇 2020 年至 2023 年的同行评审文章。研究结果表明,现有文献偏重于技术问题,而对其他主题的关注相对较少,如背景知识共创问题、概念化和应用领域。虽然人工智能的技术问题越来越多,但已确定的三个安全关切领域是数据安全、模型安全和网络安全。此外,综述发现,当代人工智能不断推动计算能力的发展,以应对日益复杂的决策挑战,它在两个主要方面有别于早期的人工智能:自主性和可学习性,这两个方面极大地影响了组织在应对人工智能潜力方面的学习。本研究通过对当前问题、研究方法、分析水平和概念方法以及人工智能框架的深入剖析,为人工智能研究做出了贡献,有助于找出未来研究的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信