Effectiveness of Dexmedetomidine vs Propofol in Post-Open Heart Surgery Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study at the PLA Army Central Hospital in Beijing, China

Li Shen
{"title":"Effectiveness of Dexmedetomidine vs Propofol in Post-Open Heart Surgery Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study at the PLA Army Central Hospital in Beijing, China","authors":"Li Shen","doi":"10.37275/jacr.v5i2.534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Dexmedetomidine and propofol are sedation drugs commonly used in patients after open heart surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine and propofol in patients after open heart surgery in terms of sleep quality, delirium, and hemodynamics. \nMethods: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted on 120 patients after open heart surgery at the PLA Army Central Hospital in Beijing, China. Patients were randomized to receive dexmedetomidine (n = 60) or propofol (n = 60). Sleep quality was measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Scale (PSQI), delirium was measured using the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU), and hemodynamics were monitored continuously. \nResults: Patients receiving dexmedetomidine had lower PSQI scores (p < 0.05) and a lower incidence of delirium (p < 0.05) compared with patients receiving propofol. There were no significant differences in hemodynamic parameters between the two groups. \nConclusion: Dexmedetomidine is more effective than propofol in improving sleep quality and reducing delirium in patients after open heart surgery.","PeriodicalId":496787,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesiology and Clinical Research","volume":"106 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesiology and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37275/jacr.v5i2.534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Dexmedetomidine and propofol are sedation drugs commonly used in patients after open heart surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine and propofol in patients after open heart surgery in terms of sleep quality, delirium, and hemodynamics. Methods: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted on 120 patients after open heart surgery at the PLA Army Central Hospital in Beijing, China. Patients were randomized to receive dexmedetomidine (n = 60) or propofol (n = 60). Sleep quality was measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Scale (PSQI), delirium was measured using the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU), and hemodynamics were monitored continuously. Results: Patients receiving dexmedetomidine had lower PSQI scores (p < 0.05) and a lower incidence of delirium (p < 0.05) compared with patients receiving propofol. There were no significant differences in hemodynamic parameters between the two groups. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine is more effective than propofol in improving sleep quality and reducing delirium in patients after open heart surgery.
右美托咪定与异丙酚对开胸手术后患者的疗效对比:中国人民解放军陆军总医院的一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究
简介右美托咪定和丙泊酚是开胸手术后患者常用的镇静药物。本研究旨在比较右美托咪定和丙泊酚在开胸手术后患者睡眠质量、谵妄和血液动力学方面的效果。研究方法一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究在中国北京中国人民解放军陆军中心医院对 120 名开放性心脏手术后患者进行了研究。患者随机接受右美托咪定(60 人)或异丙酚(60 人)治疗。睡眠质量采用匹兹堡睡眠质量量表(PSQI)进行测量,谵妄采用重症监护室谵妄评估法(CAM-ICU)进行测量,并对血液动力学进行连续监测。结果与接受异丙酚治疗的患者相比,接受右美托咪定治疗的患者 PSQI 评分较低(P < 0.05),谵妄发生率较低(P < 0.05)。两组患者的血液动力学参数无明显差异。结论右美托咪定在改善开胸手术后患者的睡眠质量和减少谵妄方面比丙泊酚更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信