Impact of Small Anaerobic Digester on Household Economy of Bangladeshi Livestock Farmers

Q4 Environmental Science
N. Sultana, J. S. Khanam, K. S. Huque, B. K. Roy, N. Huda, M. K. Alam
{"title":"Impact of Small Anaerobic Digester on Household Economy of Bangladeshi Livestock Farmers","authors":"N. Sultana, J. S. Khanam, K. S. Huque, B. K. Roy, N. Huda, M. K. Alam","doi":"10.46488/nept.2024.v23i01.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An extensive survey was performed covering all the regions of the country to find out the overall impacts of bio-digester on the economy of livestock farmers. Five districts were selected; ten farmers with having bio-digester of 3.2 m3 on average and ten farmers who have no bio-digester were selected from each district. Through direct interviewing and farm monitoring, all farm characteristics, i.e., diurnal biogas production, power generation, cooking time, income and expenditures, farmer’s gross earnings, and manure management practices data were collected accordingly. Descriptive statistics and student t-test was made to express the comparison response of the farms by using XL and SPSS software. It was observed that the owners of anaerobic digesters earned significantly (p < 0.001) more than the traditional farmers by selling animals and biogas (1715 & 306; 1146 & 0.00 USD, respectively). Not only that, by selling milk and fresh manure, the owners of bio-digester harvested more (p < 0.05) annual income than non-bio-digester farmers (4162, 3408 & 60.91, 44.63 USD, respectively). Though the expenditure of farmers having digester was high, but in a single fiscal year, they earned more (p < 0.05) profit than the conventional farmers (USD 4329 & 2842, respectively). However, owners of bio-digester used 67.2 % of their produced manure for gas production. Regarding storing manure as biomass and using it for cooking purposes significant difference (p < 0.001) was observed that was also reflected in the total manure management system of a farm. The farmers having no bio-digester stored 71.95% of their total manure in solid form, whereas the farmers who had bio-digester only stored 20.4% of their manure, which made a significant (p < 0.001) difference. From the biogas chamber, in an average one farmer used a gas stove for 4-5 hours and a gas lamp for 6-8 hours, which saved at least the expenditure of 18 USD per month/household. The notable thing was that the bio-digester alone contributed 7% to those farmers’ gross economy by producing gas. It can be recommended that the rural householders could generate power by installing bio-digester and turn a small bio-digester as a beneficial avenue of their household economy.","PeriodicalId":18783,"journal":{"name":"Nature Environment and Pollution Technology","volume":"63 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Environment and Pollution Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46488/nept.2024.v23i01.046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An extensive survey was performed covering all the regions of the country to find out the overall impacts of bio-digester on the economy of livestock farmers. Five districts were selected; ten farmers with having bio-digester of 3.2 m3 on average and ten farmers who have no bio-digester were selected from each district. Through direct interviewing and farm monitoring, all farm characteristics, i.e., diurnal biogas production, power generation, cooking time, income and expenditures, farmer’s gross earnings, and manure management practices data were collected accordingly. Descriptive statistics and student t-test was made to express the comparison response of the farms by using XL and SPSS software. It was observed that the owners of anaerobic digesters earned significantly (p < 0.001) more than the traditional farmers by selling animals and biogas (1715 & 306; 1146 & 0.00 USD, respectively). Not only that, by selling milk and fresh manure, the owners of bio-digester harvested more (p < 0.05) annual income than non-bio-digester farmers (4162, 3408 & 60.91, 44.63 USD, respectively). Though the expenditure of farmers having digester was high, but in a single fiscal year, they earned more (p < 0.05) profit than the conventional farmers (USD 4329 & 2842, respectively). However, owners of bio-digester used 67.2 % of their produced manure for gas production. Regarding storing manure as biomass and using it for cooking purposes significant difference (p < 0.001) was observed that was also reflected in the total manure management system of a farm. The farmers having no bio-digester stored 71.95% of their total manure in solid form, whereas the farmers who had bio-digester only stored 20.4% of their manure, which made a significant (p < 0.001) difference. From the biogas chamber, in an average one farmer used a gas stove for 4-5 hours and a gas lamp for 6-8 hours, which saved at least the expenditure of 18 USD per month/household. The notable thing was that the bio-digester alone contributed 7% to those farmers’ gross economy by producing gas. It can be recommended that the rural householders could generate power by installing bio-digester and turn a small bio-digester as a beneficial avenue of their household economy.
小型厌氧消化器对孟加拉国畜牧业农民家庭经济的影响
为了了解生物消化池对畜牧业农民经济的总体影响,我们在全国所有地区进行了广泛的调查。调查选取了五个地区,每个地区选取了十个平均拥有 3.2 立方米生物消化池的养殖户和十个没有生物消化池的养殖户。通过直接访谈和农场监测,收集了所有农场特征,即昼夜沼气产量、发电量、烹饪时间、收入和支出、农民总收入以及粪便管理方法数据。使用 XL 和 SPSS 软件进行了描述性统计和学生 t 检验,以表示农场的比较反应。结果显示,厌氧沼气池所有者通过出售牲畜和沼气的收入(分别为 1715 美元和 306 美元;1146 美元和 0.00 美元)明显高于传统农民(p < 0.001)。不仅如此,通过出售牛奶和新鲜粪便,生物沼气池所有者的年收入(分别为 4162、3408 和 60.91、44.63 美元)也高于非生物沼气池农民(p < 0.05)。虽然拥有沼气池的农户支出较高,但在单一财政年度,他们比传统农户获得了更多的利润(p < 0.05)(分别为 4329 美元和 2842 美元)。然而,生物发酵池的所有者将 67.2% 的粪便用于燃气生产。在将粪便作为生物质储存和用于烹饪方面,观察到了显著差异(p < 0.001),这也反映在农场的整个粪便管理系统中。没有沼气池的农场主以固体形式储存了 71.95% 的粪便,而有沼气池的农场主只储存了 20.4% 的粪便,差异显著(p < 0.001)。使用沼气池的农户平均使用煤气灶 4-5 小时,煤气灯 6-8 小时,每户每月至少节省 18 美元的开支。值得注意的是,仅沼气池产生的沼气就为农民带来了 7% 的经济效益。可以建议农村家庭通过安装生物发酵装置来发电,并将小型生物发酵装置作为家庭经济的有利途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Environment and Pollution Technology
Nature Environment and Pollution Technology Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
159
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal was established initially by the name of Journal of Environment and Pollution in 1994, whose name was later changed to Nature Environment and Pollution Technology in the year 2002. It has now become an open access online journal from the year 2017 with ISSN: 2395-3454 (Online). The journal was established especially to promote the cause for environment and to cater the need for rapid dissemination of the vast scientific and technological data generated in this field. It is a part of many reputed international indexing and abstracting agencies. The Journal has evoked a highly encouraging response among the researchers, scientists and technocrats. It has a reputed International Editorial Board and publishes peer reviewed papers. The Journal has also been approved by UGC (India). The journal publishes both original research and review papers. The ideology and scope of the Journal includes the following. -Monitoring, control and management of air, water, soil and noise pollution -Solid waste management -Industrial hygiene and occupational health -Biomedical aspects of pollution -Toxicological studies -Radioactive pollution and radiation effects -Wastewater treatment and recycling etc. -Environmental modelling -Biodiversity and conservation -Dynamics and behaviour of chemicals in environment -Natural resources, wildlife, forests and wetlands etc. -Environmental laws and legal aspects -Environmental economics -Any other topic related to environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信