A Review of the Distribution and Health Effect of Organophosphorus Flame Retardants in Indoor Environments

Toxics Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.3390/toxics12030195
Xingwei Song, Sheng Zhu, Ling Hu, Xiaojia Chen, Jiaqi Zhang, Yi Liu, Qingwei Bu, Yuning Ma
{"title":"A Review of the Distribution and Health Effect of Organophosphorus Flame Retardants in Indoor Environments","authors":"Xingwei Song, Sheng Zhu, Ling Hu, Xiaojia Chen, Jiaqi Zhang, Yi Liu, Qingwei Bu, Yuning Ma","doi":"10.3390/toxics12030195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a replacement for polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs) have been widely used and detected in different indoor environments all over the world. This paper comprehensively describes the concentration levels and distribution information of 11 kinds of OPFRs from 33 indoor dust and 10 air environments, from which TBOEP, TCIPP, and TDCIPP were observed to have higher concentrations in indoor environments. The ΣOPFRs displayed higher concentrations in indoor dust than in indoor air due to the higher molecular weight and vapor pressure of ΣOPFRs in building decoration materials, specifically for TCIPP and TDCIPP compounds. Considering that it is inevitable that people will be exposed to these chemicals in the indoor environments in which they work and live, we estimated their potential health risks through three human exposure pathways and found that the ingestion exposure to TBOEP for toddlers in Japan may reach up to 1270.80 ng/kg/day, which comprises a significant pathway compared to dermal contact and indoor air inhalation. Specifically, the combined total exposure to OPFRs by air inhalation, dust ingestion, and dermal contact was generally below the RfD values for both adults and toddlers, with a few notable higher exposures of some typical OPFRs.","PeriodicalId":508978,"journal":{"name":"Toxics","volume":"54 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12030195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a replacement for polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs) have been widely used and detected in different indoor environments all over the world. This paper comprehensively describes the concentration levels and distribution information of 11 kinds of OPFRs from 33 indoor dust and 10 air environments, from which TBOEP, TCIPP, and TDCIPP were observed to have higher concentrations in indoor environments. The ΣOPFRs displayed higher concentrations in indoor dust than in indoor air due to the higher molecular weight and vapor pressure of ΣOPFRs in building decoration materials, specifically for TCIPP and TDCIPP compounds. Considering that it is inevitable that people will be exposed to these chemicals in the indoor environments in which they work and live, we estimated their potential health risks through three human exposure pathways and found that the ingestion exposure to TBOEP for toddlers in Japan may reach up to 1270.80 ng/kg/day, which comprises a significant pathway compared to dermal contact and indoor air inhalation. Specifically, the combined total exposure to OPFRs by air inhalation, dust ingestion, and dermal contact was generally below the RfD values for both adults and toddlers, with a few notable higher exposures of some typical OPFRs.
有机磷阻燃剂在室内环境中的分布及其对健康的影响综述
作为多溴联苯醚(PBDEs)的替代品,有机磷阻燃剂(OPFRs)被广泛使用,并在全球不同的室内环境中被检测到。本文全面描述了 33 种室内灰尘和 10 种空气环境中 11 种 OPFRs 的浓度水平和分布信息,其中 TBOEP、TCIPP 和 TDCIPP 在室内环境中的浓度较高。ΣOPFRs在室内灰尘中的浓度高于在室内空气中的浓度,这是因为ΣOPFRs在建筑装饰材料中的分子量和蒸汽压较高,特别是TCIPP和TDCIPP化合物。考虑到人们在工作和生活的室内环境中不可避免地会接触到这些化学物质,我们通过三种人体接触途径对其潜在的健康风险进行了估算,发现日本幼儿摄入 TBOEP 的剂量可能高达 1270.80 纳克/千克/天,与皮肤接触和室内空气吸入相比,这是一个重要的途径。具体来说,成人和幼儿通过空气吸入、粉尘摄入和皮肤接触摄入的 OPFRs 总量一般都低于 RfD 值,但某些典型 OPFRs 的摄入量明显较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信