Thermosensitive/thermochromic silicone and infrared thermography mapping in 60 consecutive cases of epilepsy surgery

E. D. Font-Réaulx, Andrea Solis-Santamaria, Emilio Arch-Tirado, Adalberto González-Astiazarán
{"title":"Thermosensitive/thermochromic silicone and infrared thermography mapping in 60 consecutive cases of epilepsy surgery","authors":"E. D. Font-Réaulx, Andrea Solis-Santamaria, Emilio Arch-Tirado, Adalberto González-Astiazarán","doi":"10.25259/sni_763_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nEpilepsy surgery represents a therapeutic opportunity for those patients who do not respond to drug therapy. However, an important challenge is the precise identification of the epileptogenic area during surgery. Since it can be hard to delineate, it makes it necessary to use auxiliary tools as a guide during the surgical procedure. Electrocorticography (ECoG), despite having shown favorable results in terms of reducing post-surgical seizures, have certain limitations. Brain mapping using infrared thermography mapping and a new thermosensitive/thermochromic silicone (TTS) in epilepsy surgery has introduced a new resource of noninvasive and real-time devices that allow the localization of irritative zones.\n\n\n\nSixty consecutive patients with drug-resistant epilepsy with surgical indications who decided to participate voluntarily in the study were included in the study. We measured brain temperature using two quantitative methods and a qualitative method: the TTS sheet. In all cases, we used ECoG as the gold standard to identify irritative areas, and all brain tissue samples obtained were sent to pathology for diagnosis.\n\n\n\nIn the subgroup in which the ECoG detected irritative areas (n = 51), adding the results in which there was a correlation with the different methods, the efficiency obtained to detect irritative areas is 94.11% (n = 48/51, P ≤ 0.0001) while the infrared thermography mapping method independently has an efficiency of 91.66% (P ≤ 0.0001). The TTS has a sensitivity of 95.71% and a specificity of 97.9% (P ≤ 0.0001) to detect hypothermic areas that correlate with the irritative zones detected by ECoG. No postoperative infections or wound dehiscence were documented, so the different methodologies used do not represent an additional risk for the surgical proceedings.\n\n\n\nWe consider that the infrared thermography mapping using high-resolution infrared thermography cameras and the TTS are both accurate and safe methods to identify irritative areas in epilepsy surgeries.\n","PeriodicalId":504441,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Neurology International","volume":"68 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/sni_763_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Epilepsy surgery represents a therapeutic opportunity for those patients who do not respond to drug therapy. However, an important challenge is the precise identification of the epileptogenic area during surgery. Since it can be hard to delineate, it makes it necessary to use auxiliary tools as a guide during the surgical procedure. Electrocorticography (ECoG), despite having shown favorable results in terms of reducing post-surgical seizures, have certain limitations. Brain mapping using infrared thermography mapping and a new thermosensitive/thermochromic silicone (TTS) in epilepsy surgery has introduced a new resource of noninvasive and real-time devices that allow the localization of irritative zones. Sixty consecutive patients with drug-resistant epilepsy with surgical indications who decided to participate voluntarily in the study were included in the study. We measured brain temperature using two quantitative methods and a qualitative method: the TTS sheet. In all cases, we used ECoG as the gold standard to identify irritative areas, and all brain tissue samples obtained were sent to pathology for diagnosis. In the subgroup in which the ECoG detected irritative areas (n = 51), adding the results in which there was a correlation with the different methods, the efficiency obtained to detect irritative areas is 94.11% (n = 48/51, P ≤ 0.0001) while the infrared thermography mapping method independently has an efficiency of 91.66% (P ≤ 0.0001). The TTS has a sensitivity of 95.71% and a specificity of 97.9% (P ≤ 0.0001) to detect hypothermic areas that correlate with the irritative zones detected by ECoG. No postoperative infections or wound dehiscence were documented, so the different methodologies used do not represent an additional risk for the surgical proceedings. We consider that the infrared thermography mapping using high-resolution infrared thermography cameras and the TTS are both accurate and safe methods to identify irritative areas in epilepsy surgeries.
连续 60 例癫痫手术中的热敏/热致变色硅胶和红外热成像图
对于药物治疗无效的患者来说,癫痫手术是一个治疗机会。然而,一个重要的挑战是在手术过程中准确识别致痫区。由于很难确定致痫区,因此在手术过程中必须使用辅助工具作为指导。尽管皮层电图(ECoG)在减少手术后癫痫发作方面显示出良好的效果,但它也有一定的局限性。在癫痫手术中使用红外热成像图和新型热敏/热致变色硅胶(TTS)进行脑部测绘,引入了一种新的无创性实时设备资源,可以定位刺激区。我们使用两种定量方法和一种定性方法测量脑温:TTS 表。在所有病例中,我们使用心电图作为确定刺激性区域的金标准,获得的所有脑组织样本均送至病理科进行诊断。在心电图检测到刺激性区域的亚组(n = 51)中,加上与不同方法存在相关性的结果,检测到刺激性区域的效率为 94.11%(n = 48/51,P ≤ 0.0001),而红外热成像绘图法的独立效率为 91.66%(P ≤ 0.0001)。TTS 检测低体温区的灵敏度为 95.71%,特异度为 97.9%(P ≤ 0.0001),与心电图检测到的刺激区相关。没有术后感染或伤口开裂的记录,因此所使用的不同方法不会给手术过程带来额外风险。我们认为,使用高分辨率红外热成像摄像机绘制红外热成像图和TTS都是在癫痫手术中识别刺激区的准确而安全的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信