Outcomes of paediatric fundoplication stratified by subtype of neurological impairment

Emily Decker , David J. Wilkinson , Robert T. Peters , Dipak Ram , Nick Lansdale
{"title":"Outcomes of paediatric fundoplication stratified by subtype of neurological impairment","authors":"Emily Decker ,&nbsp;David J. Wilkinson ,&nbsp;Robert T. Peters ,&nbsp;Dipak Ram ,&nbsp;Nick Lansdale","doi":"10.1016/j.yjpso.2024.100136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>Jejunal feeding is increasingly seen as an alternative to fundoplication in neurologically impaired children. However, fundoplication may offer important advantages. This study aimed to determine: (i) contemporary outcomes of fundoplication from a sub-specialised service; and (ii) whether outcomes were influenced by neurological characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Single-centre retrospective review of consecutive children undergoing fundoplication by three surgeons over five years (2017–2022) using a standardised technique. Children were stratified as neurologically unimpaired, static brain injury, neuromuscular condition or neurodegenerative impairment. Failure was defined as a requirement for subsequent jejunal feeding or further surgery. Data are presented as median (IQR) unless stated. Comparisons used Fisher's test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>144 children underwent fundoplication at 1.9 years (1–5 years): 97/144 (67 %) had neurological impairment. Surgery was completed laparoscopically 128/144 (89 %) and converted in 9/137 (7 %). 84/144 (60 %) underwent concomitant gastrostomy formation. At 35 months (22–47), absolute failure was 16 % (23/144). Failure was higher in those with neurodegenerative conditions (not significant). Persistence of symptoms was noted in 23/144 (16 %). Two (1.4 %) required reoperation (&lt;30 days). Nine (6.4 %) required admission to critical care. One death within 30 days was unrelated.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Given fundoplication may provide significant benefits (avoiding pump feeds, frequent tube failure/changes and risk of jejunal perforation), success rates are high and morbidity low, fundoplication should be offered to families as an alternative to jejunal feeding as part of comprehensive counselling. There was no significant difference in outcome between neurological impairment subtypes in this sample size.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949711624000212/pdfft?md5=6ac4d326244457fd8769725272f928df&pid=1-s2.0-S2949711624000212-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949711624000212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

Jejunal feeding is increasingly seen as an alternative to fundoplication in neurologically impaired children. However, fundoplication may offer important advantages. This study aimed to determine: (i) contemporary outcomes of fundoplication from a sub-specialised service; and (ii) whether outcomes were influenced by neurological characteristics.

Methods

Single-centre retrospective review of consecutive children undergoing fundoplication by three surgeons over five years (2017–2022) using a standardised technique. Children were stratified as neurologically unimpaired, static brain injury, neuromuscular condition or neurodegenerative impairment. Failure was defined as a requirement for subsequent jejunal feeding or further surgery. Data are presented as median (IQR) unless stated. Comparisons used Fisher's test.

Results

144 children underwent fundoplication at 1.9 years (1–5 years): 97/144 (67 %) had neurological impairment. Surgery was completed laparoscopically 128/144 (89 %) and converted in 9/137 (7 %). 84/144 (60 %) underwent concomitant gastrostomy formation. At 35 months (22–47), absolute failure was 16 % (23/144). Failure was higher in those with neurodegenerative conditions (not significant). Persistence of symptoms was noted in 23/144 (16 %). Two (1.4 %) required reoperation (<30 days). Nine (6.4 %) required admission to critical care. One death within 30 days was unrelated.

Conclusions

Given fundoplication may provide significant benefits (avoiding pump feeds, frequent tube failure/changes and risk of jejunal perforation), success rates are high and morbidity low, fundoplication should be offered to families as an alternative to jejunal feeding as part of comprehensive counselling. There was no significant difference in outcome between neurological impairment subtypes in this sample size.

按神经损伤亚型分类的小儿胃底折叠术结果
目的 在神经受损儿童中,空肠喂养越来越多地被视为胃底折叠术的替代方案。然而,胃底折叠术可能具有重要优势。本研究旨在确定:(i) 亚专科服务中胃底折叠术的当代疗效;(ii) 疗效是否受神经系统特征的影响。方法对五年内(2017-2022 年)由三位外科医生采用标准化技术进行胃底折叠术的连续儿童进行单中心回顾性审查。患儿被分为神经功能未受损、静态脑损伤、神经肌肉疾病或神经退行性损伤。失败的定义是需要后续空肠喂养或进一步手术。除非另有说明,否则数据均以中位数(IQR)表示。结果 144 名儿童在 1.9 岁(1-5 岁)时接受了胃底折叠术:97/144(67%)名患儿存在神经功能障碍。128/144(89%)名患儿在腹腔镜下完成手术,9/137(7%)名患儿转为腹腔镜手术。84/144(60%)人同时进行了胃造口术。35个月(22-47个月)时,绝对失败率为16%(23/144)。神经退行性疾病患者的失败率更高(无显著性差异)。23/144(16%)的患者症状持续存在。两人(1.4%)需要再次手术(30 天)。9人(6.4%)需要接受重症监护。结论鉴于胃底折叠术可带来显著的益处(避免泵喂养、频繁的管道故障/更换和空肠穿孔风险),且成功率高、发病率低,因此应向家属提供胃底折叠术,作为空肠喂养的替代方案,并将其作为综合咨询的一部分。在这一样本量中,神经功能损伤亚型之间的结果没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信