Opportunities and Challenges in Using the “Community of Inquiry” Model in Teaching Ethics

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Iulia Grad
{"title":"Opportunities and Challenges in Using the “Community of Inquiry” Model in Teaching Ethics","authors":"Iulia Grad","doi":"10.18662/rrem/16.1/818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Philosophy for children (P4C) is an area that has experienced impressive growth in recent decades, proving to be a highly valuable resource in children's development. Studies demonstrate its significant impact on the development of logical thinking, critical reasoning, imagination, and fostering openness to dialogue and collaboration. While there are various perspectives and methods in the field of philosophy for children, a common element among them all is the centrality of the concept of dialogue. P4C serves as a paradigmatic example of what dialogical education represents. The underlying assumption of this paper is that the specific practices of philosophy for children provide valuable methods and perspectives that can be useful in teaching ethics in communication and ethics in general, particularly for students without prior training in philosophy. Recognizing the potential challenges and the need for context-specific adaptation, this paper seeks to illustrate how the integration of the models used in P4C practices, such as the communities of inquiry, into communication ethics education, can provide a promising and innovative approach to fostering ethical and critical thinking in students.","PeriodicalId":45328,"journal":{"name":"Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.1/818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Philosophy for children (P4C) is an area that has experienced impressive growth in recent decades, proving to be a highly valuable resource in children's development. Studies demonstrate its significant impact on the development of logical thinking, critical reasoning, imagination, and fostering openness to dialogue and collaboration. While there are various perspectives and methods in the field of philosophy for children, a common element among them all is the centrality of the concept of dialogue. P4C serves as a paradigmatic example of what dialogical education represents. The underlying assumption of this paper is that the specific practices of philosophy for children provide valuable methods and perspectives that can be useful in teaching ethics in communication and ethics in general, particularly for students without prior training in philosophy. Recognizing the potential challenges and the need for context-specific adaptation, this paper seeks to illustrate how the integration of the models used in P4C practices, such as the communities of inquiry, into communication ethics education, can provide a promising and innovative approach to fostering ethical and critical thinking in students.
在伦理教学中使用 "探究社区 "模式的机遇与挑战
近几十年来,儿童哲学(P4C)这一领域取得了令人瞩目的发展,被证明是儿童发展过程中非常宝贵的资源。研究表明,它对逻辑思维、批判性推理、想象力的发展以及促进开放性对话与合作有着重要影响。虽然儿童哲学领域有各种不同的观点和方法,但它们的一个共同点是以对话概念为中心。P4C 是对话式教育的典范。本文的基本假设是,儿童哲学的具体实践提供了宝贵的方法和视角,有助于传播伦 理和一般伦理学的教学,特别是对没有接受过哲学培训的学生而言。认识到潜在的挑战和根据具体情况进行调整的必要性,本文试图说明如何将 P4C 实践中使用的模式(如探究社区)融入传播伦理教育,从而为培养学生的伦理和批判性思维提供一种有前途的创新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala
Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
30.00%
发文量
126
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信