Quantifying predictive uncertainty in damage classification for Nondestructive Evaluation using Bayesian approximation and deep learning

Zi Li, Yiming Deng
{"title":"Quantifying predictive uncertainty in damage classification for Nondestructive Evaluation using Bayesian approximation and deep learning","authors":"Zi Li, Yiming Deng","doi":"10.1088/1361-6420/ad2f63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Magnetic flux leakage (MFL), a widely used Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) method, for inspecting pipelines to prevent potential long-term failures. During field testing, uncertainties can affect the accuracy of the inspection and the decision-making process regarding damage conditions. Therefore, it is essential to identify and quantify these uncertainties to ensure the reliability of the inspection. This study focuses on the uncertainties that arise during the inverse NDE process due to the dynamic magnetization process, which is affected by the relative motion of the MFL sensor and the material being tested. Specifically, the study investigates the uncertainties caused by sensing liftoff, which can affect the output signal of the sensing system. Due to the complexity of describing the forward uncertainty propagation process, this study compared two typical machine learning-based approximate Bayesian inference methods, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Deep Ensemble (DE), to address the input uncertainty from the MFL response data. Besides, an Autoencoder method is applied to tackle the lack of experimental data for the training model by augmenting the dataset, which is constructed with the pre-trained model based on transfer learning. Prior knowledge learned from large simulated MFL signals can fine-tune the Autoencoder model which enhances the subsequent learning process on experimental MFL data with faster generalization. The augmented data from the fine-tuned Autoencoder is further applied for machine learning-based defect size classification. This study conducted prediction accuracy and uncertainty analysis with calibration, which can evaluate the prediction performance and reveal the relation between the liftoff uncertainty and prediction accuracy. Further, to strengthen the trustworthiness of the prediction results, the decision-making process guided by uncertainty is applied to provide valuable insights into the reliability of the final prediction results. Overall, the proposed framework for uncertainty quantification offers valuable insights into the assessment of reliability in MFL-based decision-making and inverse problems.","PeriodicalId":508687,"journal":{"name":"Inverse Problems","volume":"32 40","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inverse Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/ad2f63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Magnetic flux leakage (MFL), a widely used Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) method, for inspecting pipelines to prevent potential long-term failures. During field testing, uncertainties can affect the accuracy of the inspection and the decision-making process regarding damage conditions. Therefore, it is essential to identify and quantify these uncertainties to ensure the reliability of the inspection. This study focuses on the uncertainties that arise during the inverse NDE process due to the dynamic magnetization process, which is affected by the relative motion of the MFL sensor and the material being tested. Specifically, the study investigates the uncertainties caused by sensing liftoff, which can affect the output signal of the sensing system. Due to the complexity of describing the forward uncertainty propagation process, this study compared two typical machine learning-based approximate Bayesian inference methods, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Deep Ensemble (DE), to address the input uncertainty from the MFL response data. Besides, an Autoencoder method is applied to tackle the lack of experimental data for the training model by augmenting the dataset, which is constructed with the pre-trained model based on transfer learning. Prior knowledge learned from large simulated MFL signals can fine-tune the Autoencoder model which enhances the subsequent learning process on experimental MFL data with faster generalization. The augmented data from the fine-tuned Autoencoder is further applied for machine learning-based defect size classification. This study conducted prediction accuracy and uncertainty analysis with calibration, which can evaluate the prediction performance and reveal the relation between the liftoff uncertainty and prediction accuracy. Further, to strengthen the trustworthiness of the prediction results, the decision-making process guided by uncertainty is applied to provide valuable insights into the reliability of the final prediction results. Overall, the proposed framework for uncertainty quantification offers valuable insights into the assessment of reliability in MFL-based decision-making and inverse problems.
利用贝叶斯近似和深度学习量化无损评价中损伤分类的预测不确定性
磁通量泄漏(MFL)是一种广泛使用的无损检测(NDE)方法,用于检测管道以防止潜在的长期故障。在现场测试过程中,不确定因素会影响检测的准确性和有关损坏情况的决策过程。因此,必须识别和量化这些不确定性,以确保检测的可靠性。本研究的重点是反向无损检测过程中由于动态磁化过程而产生的不确定性,动态磁化过程受到 MFL 传感器和被测材料相对运动的影响。具体来说,该研究调查了传感升空造成的不确定性,升空会影响传感系统的输出信号。由于描述前向不确定性传播过程的复杂性,本研究比较了两种典型的基于机器学习的近似贝叶斯推理方法,即卷积神经网络(CNN)和深度集合(DE),以解决来自 MFL 响应数据的输入不确定性。此外,还采用了自动编码器方法,通过增强数据集来解决训练模型缺乏实验数据的问题,数据集是基于迁移学习构建的预训练模型。从大量模拟 MFL 信号中学到的先验知识可以对自动编码器模型进行微调,从而增强后续对 MFL 实验数据的学习过程,并加快泛化速度。微调后的自动编码器生成的增强数据可进一步应用于基于机器学习的缺陷大小分类。本研究通过校准进行了预测精度和不确定性分析,从而评估了预测性能,并揭示了起飞不确定性与预测精度之间的关系。此外,为了加强预测结果的可信度,还应用了不确定性指导下的决策过程,为最终预测结果的可靠性提供了有价值的见解。总之,所提出的不确定性量化框架为基于 MFL 的决策和逆问题中的可靠性评估提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信