{"title":"Multifunctionality and contextual realization","authors":"Xuhui Hu, J. J. Perry","doi":"10.1075/lv.22013.per","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper aims to make a contribution to the study of the nature of syntactic categories by analysing a single\n element in a single language, namely the marker -lao in Yixing Chinese. Although this marker has previously been\n analysed as an adjectivaliser (Hu and Perry 2018), we show that it has a much broader\n range of uses. We suggest that the bulk of cases can be captured in a unified way by supposing that the marker in question\n displays a type of possessive semantics (which we label possession-as-attribute), which is defined by delineating\n a kind (in the sense of e.g. Carlson 1977; Chierchia 1998), with similar semantics being expressed by adjectival elements in languages such as\n English. It is observed, however, that this meaning can emerge in the absence of the marker -lao, and that\n -lao can, in a restricted set of cases, surface in the absence of this meaning, and we suggest that these\n facts are attributable to the diachronic development of the marker and can be captured synchronically by making use of\n late-insertion mechanisms for phonological and semantic features. We propose that the case of -lao provides a\n suggestive argument for a substance-free approach to syntactic features, whereby syntactic features are not\n inherently specified for interface interpretations. Other cross-linguistic implications of our analysis are noted, in particular\n for the representation of adjectives.","PeriodicalId":53947,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Variation","volume":"104 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Variation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.22013.per","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper aims to make a contribution to the study of the nature of syntactic categories by analysing a single
element in a single language, namely the marker -lao in Yixing Chinese. Although this marker has previously been
analysed as an adjectivaliser (Hu and Perry 2018), we show that it has a much broader
range of uses. We suggest that the bulk of cases can be captured in a unified way by supposing that the marker in question
displays a type of possessive semantics (which we label possession-as-attribute), which is defined by delineating
a kind (in the sense of e.g. Carlson 1977; Chierchia 1998), with similar semantics being expressed by adjectival elements in languages such as
English. It is observed, however, that this meaning can emerge in the absence of the marker -lao, and that
-lao can, in a restricted set of cases, surface in the absence of this meaning, and we suggest that these
facts are attributable to the diachronic development of the marker and can be captured synchronically by making use of
late-insertion mechanisms for phonological and semantic features. We propose that the case of -lao provides a
suggestive argument for a substance-free approach to syntactic features, whereby syntactic features are not
inherently specified for interface interpretations. Other cross-linguistic implications of our analysis are noted, in particular
for the representation of adjectives.
期刊介绍:
Linguistic Variation is an international, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on the study of linguistic variation. It seeks to investigate to what extent the study of linguistic variation can shed light on the broader issue of language-particular versus language-universal properties, on the interaction between what is fixed and necessary on the one hand and what is variable and contingent on the other. This enterprise involves properly defining and delineating the notion of linguistic variation by identifying loci of variation. What are the variable properties of natural language and what is its invariant core?