Dupuytren's Disease: A Novel Minimally Invasive Pull-Through Technique

M. Maruccia, P. Tedeschi, Francesco Sisto, Ilaria Converti, Giuseppe Giudice, R. Elia
{"title":"Dupuytren's Disease: A Novel Minimally Invasive Pull-Through Technique","authors":"M. Maruccia, P. Tedeschi, Francesco Sisto, Ilaria Converti, Giuseppe Giudice, R. Elia","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1775882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background Dupuytren's disease decreases quality of life significantly and often requires surgical treatment, nevertheless there is no actual gold standard. The aim of this study was to introduce the use of minimally invasive pull-through technique.\n Methods From 2016 to 2020, 52 patients suffering from Dupuytren's contracture were treated with the minimally invasive pull-through technique. We evaluated the improvement in range of motion, pain, disability, and quality of life in the long term. Total extension deficit, quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QuickDASH), and EuroQol five dimensions—five levels index were systematically scored before each surgical intervention and reevaluated after 24 months.\n Results Fourteen patients (26.9%) had already received a previous intervention (percutaneous needle aponeurotomy or collagenase Clostridium histolyticum). The mean preoperative total active extension deficit was 84.0 ± 23.3 degrees (55–130 degrees). Mean follow-up was 36 months. There were no cases of tendon rupture or neurovascular injury. Total active extension deficit at the final follow-up was 3.4 ± 2.3 degrees (0–12 degrees). The mean active range of motion of the MCP and PIP joints were, respectively, 90.5 ± 3.3 degrees (85–96 degrees) and 82.7 ± 2.5 degrees (80–87 degrees). At 24 months after cord excision, a mean 10.7 points improvement in the QuickDASH questionnaire was registered (p < 0.001). Pull-through technique was equally effective both on patients with a primary or a recurrent disease. Eight patients (15.4%) had a recurrence of disease in the metacarpophalangeal joint or proximal interphalangeal joint.\n Conclusion The pull-through technique is a simple, accessible, and effective technique for the treatment of Dupuytren's contracture. The use of palmar mini-incisions combined with minimal dissection has a low risk of iatrogenic injury to the neurovascular bundles and tendons, and has a low risk of recurrence rate. This study reflects level of evidence IV.","PeriodicalId":505284,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1775882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Dupuytren's disease decreases quality of life significantly and often requires surgical treatment, nevertheless there is no actual gold standard. The aim of this study was to introduce the use of minimally invasive pull-through technique. Methods From 2016 to 2020, 52 patients suffering from Dupuytren's contracture were treated with the minimally invasive pull-through technique. We evaluated the improvement in range of motion, pain, disability, and quality of life in the long term. Total extension deficit, quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QuickDASH), and EuroQol five dimensions—five levels index were systematically scored before each surgical intervention and reevaluated after 24 months. Results Fourteen patients (26.9%) had already received a previous intervention (percutaneous needle aponeurotomy or collagenase Clostridium histolyticum). The mean preoperative total active extension deficit was 84.0 ± 23.3 degrees (55–130 degrees). Mean follow-up was 36 months. There were no cases of tendon rupture or neurovascular injury. Total active extension deficit at the final follow-up was 3.4 ± 2.3 degrees (0–12 degrees). The mean active range of motion of the MCP and PIP joints were, respectively, 90.5 ± 3.3 degrees (85–96 degrees) and 82.7 ± 2.5 degrees (80–87 degrees). At 24 months after cord excision, a mean 10.7 points improvement in the QuickDASH questionnaire was registered (p < 0.001). Pull-through technique was equally effective both on patients with a primary or a recurrent disease. Eight patients (15.4%) had a recurrence of disease in the metacarpophalangeal joint or proximal interphalangeal joint. Conclusion The pull-through technique is a simple, accessible, and effective technique for the treatment of Dupuytren's contracture. The use of palmar mini-incisions combined with minimal dissection has a low risk of iatrogenic injury to the neurovascular bundles and tendons, and has a low risk of recurrence rate. This study reflects level of evidence IV.
杜普伊特伦氏病:新型微创拉通技术
背景 杜普伊特伦氏病严重影响患者的生活质量,通常需要手术治疗,但目前还没有真正的金标准。本研究旨在介绍微创拉通技术的应用。方法 从 2016 年到 2020 年,52 名杜普伊特伦挛缩症患者接受了微创拉通技术治疗。我们对患者的活动范围、疼痛、残疾和长期生活质量的改善情况进行了评估。在每次手术干预前,我们都会对患者的总伸展畸形、手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾(QuickDASH)以及EuroQol五维-五级指数进行系统评分,并在24个月后进行复查。结果 14 名患者(26.9%)之前已接受过干预(经皮针刺神经切断术或胶原酶组织溶解梭菌)。术前总活动伸展缺损的平均值为 84.0 ± 23.3 度(55-130 度)。平均随访时间为 36 个月。无肌腱断裂或神经血管损伤病例。最后随访时的总主动伸展度为 3.4 ± 2.3 度(0-12 度)。MCP 和 PIP 关节的平均活动范围分别为 90.5 ± 3.3 度(85-96 度)和 82.7 ± 2.5 度(80-87 度)。脊髓切除术后 24 个月,QuickDASH 问卷调查平均得分提高了 10.7 分(P < 0.001)。拉通技术对原发性或复发性疾病患者同样有效。8名患者(15.4%)的掌指关节或近端指间关节复发。结论 拉通技术是治疗杜普伊特伦挛缩症的一种简单、方便、有效的技术。使用掌侧小切口结合最小剥离,对神经血管束和肌腱造成先天性损伤的风险较低,复发率也较低。本研究的证据等级为 IV 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信