Parenting Consensual Non-Monogamists’ Perceptions of Parenthood, Intimacy, and Communication

Aporia Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI:10.18192/aporia.v16i1.6735
Jacqueline Avanthay Strus, Viola Polomeno
{"title":"Parenting Consensual Non-Monogamists’ Perceptions of Parenthood, Intimacy, and Communication","authors":"Jacqueline Avanthay Strus, Viola Polomeno","doi":"10.18192/aporia.v16i1.6735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents partial results of a larger mixed methods study about consensual non-monogamists’ perceptions of their parenting and sexual lifestyle, particularly those involving the transition to parenthood, intimacy and communication. Using The Expanding the Movement for Empowerment and Reproductive Justice lens, six participants completed an online questionnaire and a semi-structured interview guide. Consensual non-monogamists are like other parents, yet they prioritise sexual intimacy over emotional intimacy. Communication is very important for them. The quantitative results support the qualitative ones: the participants had a higher level of parenting sense of competence, and the means for emotional and sexual intimacy were lower for primary partners than for secondary ones. Perinatal health care professionals including nurses need to know more about parenting consensual non-monogamists and their partner(s). More research is warranted with this particular group of parents, especially on their experiences of minority stress, resilience and taking a more intersectional research approach.","PeriodicalId":30068,"journal":{"name":"Aporia","volume":"25 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aporia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18192/aporia.v16i1.6735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents partial results of a larger mixed methods study about consensual non-monogamists’ perceptions of their parenting and sexual lifestyle, particularly those involving the transition to parenthood, intimacy and communication. Using The Expanding the Movement for Empowerment and Reproductive Justice lens, six participants completed an online questionnaire and a semi-structured interview guide. Consensual non-monogamists are like other parents, yet they prioritise sexual intimacy over emotional intimacy. Communication is very important for them. The quantitative results support the qualitative ones: the participants had a higher level of parenting sense of competence, and the means for emotional and sexual intimacy were lower for primary partners than for secondary ones. Perinatal health care professionals including nurses need to know more about parenting consensual non-monogamists and their partner(s). More research is warranted with this particular group of parents, especially on their experiences of minority stress, resilience and taking a more intersectional research approach.
父母双方同意的非一夫一妻制者对父母身份、亲密关系和沟通的看法
本文介绍了一项大型混合方法研究的部分结果,该研究涉及双方同意的非一夫一妻制者对其养育子女和性生活方式的看法,特别是涉及向父母身份过渡、亲密关系和沟通的看法。利用 "扩大赋权和生殖正义运动 "的视角,六名参与者完成了一份在线问卷和一份半结构化访谈指南。双方同意的非一夫一妻制者与其他父母一样,但他们将性亲密关系置于情感亲密关系之上。沟通对他们来说非常重要。定量结果支持定性结果:参与者的育儿能力感较高,主要伴侣的情感亲密感和性亲密感均低于次要伴侣。围产期保健专业人员(包括护士)需要更多地了解双方同意的非一夫一妻者及其伴侣的养育情况。有必要对这一特殊的父母群体进行更多的研究,特别是关于他们在少数群体压力、复原力方面的经历,并采取一种更具交叉性的研究方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信