A comprehensive catalog of refactoring strategies to handle test smells in Java-based systems

IF 1.7 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Luana Martins, Taher A. Ghaleb, Heitor Costa, Ivan Machado
{"title":"A comprehensive catalog of refactoring strategies to handle test smells in Java-based systems","authors":"Luana Martins, Taher A. Ghaleb, Heitor Costa, Ivan Machado","doi":"10.1007/s11219-024-09663-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Test smells, detrimental coding practices that hinder high-quality test code development, pose a significant challenge in software testing and maintenance. Software refactoring, traditionally a powerful approach for addressing code smells and improving software quality without changing functionality, often focuses on production code, leaving test code overlooked. Despite extensive research in test smell refactoring, understanding the efficacy of existing refactoring operations on test code quality remains limited. Investigating real-world developer refactoring practices is crucial to bridge this knowledge gap. In this study, we investigate refactorings performed by developers to address test smells, resulting in a comprehensive catalog of test smells and their corresponding test-specific refactorings. Two test-specific refactorings closely tied to <span>JUnit5</span> and seven version-agnostic refactorings for various <span>JUnit</span> versions have been identified. While many of these test-specific refactorings are documented in the literature, this analysis unveils new test-specific refactorings aimed at dealing with the “Inappropriate Assertion” test smell. This research provides insights into the challenges faced by developers and prevailing practices for effectively refactoring test code, thereby enhancing software testing and maintenance.</p>","PeriodicalId":21827,"journal":{"name":"Software Quality Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Software Quality Journal","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-024-09663-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Test smells, detrimental coding practices that hinder high-quality test code development, pose a significant challenge in software testing and maintenance. Software refactoring, traditionally a powerful approach for addressing code smells and improving software quality without changing functionality, often focuses on production code, leaving test code overlooked. Despite extensive research in test smell refactoring, understanding the efficacy of existing refactoring operations on test code quality remains limited. Investigating real-world developer refactoring practices is crucial to bridge this knowledge gap. In this study, we investigate refactorings performed by developers to address test smells, resulting in a comprehensive catalog of test smells and their corresponding test-specific refactorings. Two test-specific refactorings closely tied to JUnit5 and seven version-agnostic refactorings for various JUnit versions have been identified. While many of these test-specific refactorings are documented in the literature, this analysis unveils new test-specific refactorings aimed at dealing with the “Inappropriate Assertion” test smell. This research provides insights into the challenges faced by developers and prevailing practices for effectively refactoring test code, thereby enhancing software testing and maintenance.

Abstract Image

处理基于 Java 的系统中测试气味的重构策略综合目录
测试气味是妨碍高质量测试代码开发的有害编码实践,是软件测试和维护的重大挑战。软件重构历来是解决代码气味和在不改变功能的情况下提高软件质量的有效方法,但它往往只关注生产代码,而忽略了测试代码。尽管对测试气味重构进行了广泛的研究,但对现有重构操作对测试代码质量的影响的了解仍然有限。调查现实世界中开发人员的重构实践对于弥合这一知识鸿沟至关重要。在本研究中,我们调查了开发人员为解决测试气味而进行的重构,从而形成了一个全面的测试气味及其相应的测试特定重构目录。我们发现了两种与 JUnit5 紧密相关的特定测试重构,以及七种针对不同 JUnit 版本的版本无关重构。虽然这些特定于测试的重构在文献中已有记载,但本分析揭示了新的特定于测试的重构,旨在处理 "不恰当断言 "测试气味。这项研究深入探讨了开发人员面临的挑战以及有效重构测试代码的普遍做法,从而加强了软件测试和维护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Software Quality Journal
Software Quality Journal 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aims of the Software Quality Journal are: (1) To promote awareness of the crucial role of quality management in the effective construction of the software systems developed, used, and/or maintained by organizations in pursuit of their business objectives. (2) To provide a forum of the exchange of experiences and information on software quality management and the methods, tools and products used to measure and achieve it. (3) To provide a vehicle for the publication of academic papers related to all aspects of software quality. The Journal addresses all aspects of software quality from both a practical and an academic viewpoint. It invites contributions from practitioners and academics, as well as national and international policy and standard making bodies, and sets out to be the definitive international reference source for such information. The Journal will accept research, technique, case study, survey and tutorial submissions that address quality-related issues including, but not limited to: internal and external quality standards, management of quality within organizations, technical aspects of quality, quality aspects for product vendors, software measurement and metrics, software testing and other quality assurance techniques, total quality management and cultural aspects. Other technical issues with regard to software quality, including: data management, formal methods, safety critical applications, and CASE.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信