A new Perspective on Jonathan – his covenant with David and his ultimate choice

IF 0.3 2区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Richard G. Hakvoort
{"title":"A new Perspective on Jonathan – his covenant with David and his ultimate choice","authors":"Richard G. Hakvoort","doi":"10.1177/03090892221149050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two issues concerning the relationship between Jonathan and David are discussed, one found at the beginning and the other at the end of their joint adventures as described in 1 Samuel. First, we consider how we should interpret the covenant between Jonathan and David. It is shown that this need not be interpreted positively in all respects. It is not mentioned anywhere that David inquired of Yahweh before making this covenant. It also looks like Jonathan lacked crucial information about Yahweh’s rejection of Saul. In the end, their covenant is a pact between the rejected house of Saul and the elected house of David, which appears not to have been blessed by Yahweh. Second, it is investigated whether Jonathan has actually made a choice between his father, Saul, and his friend David. The narrative seems to hint that Jonathan has in fact chosen Saul’s side. In the end, Jonathan decided not to stay with David but to return to his father’s house. As a consequence, Jonathan fought Saul’s battle and, ultimately, died with him, resulting in David’s grief.","PeriodicalId":51830,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of the Old Testament","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Study of the Old Testament","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03090892221149050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two issues concerning the relationship between Jonathan and David are discussed, one found at the beginning and the other at the end of their joint adventures as described in 1 Samuel. First, we consider how we should interpret the covenant between Jonathan and David. It is shown that this need not be interpreted positively in all respects. It is not mentioned anywhere that David inquired of Yahweh before making this covenant. It also looks like Jonathan lacked crucial information about Yahweh’s rejection of Saul. In the end, their covenant is a pact between the rejected house of Saul and the elected house of David, which appears not to have been blessed by Yahweh. Second, it is investigated whether Jonathan has actually made a choice between his father, Saul, and his friend David. The narrative seems to hint that Jonathan has in fact chosen Saul’s side. In the end, Jonathan decided not to stay with David but to return to his father’s house. As a consequence, Jonathan fought Saul’s battle and, ultimately, died with him, resulting in David’s grief.
乔纳森的新视角--他与大卫的盟约及其最终选择
我们将讨论有关约拿单和大卫之间关系的两个问题,一个是在《撒母耳记上》中描述的他们共同冒险的开始,另一个是在他们共同冒险的结束。首先,我们考虑如何解释约拿单和大卫之间的盟约。事实表明,这并不需要在所有方面都作正面的解释。没有任何地方提到大卫在立约之前询问过耶和华。约拿单似乎也缺乏关于耶和华拒绝扫罗的关键信息。最后,他们的盟约是被拒绝的扫罗家族和被选中的大卫家族之间的盟约,似乎没有得到耶和华的祝福。其次,约拿单是否真的在他的父亲扫罗和他的朋友大卫之间做出了选择,这也是一个值得研究的问题。这段叙述似乎暗示约拿单事实上选择了扫罗一方。最后,约拿单决定不与大卫在一起,而是回到父亲的家中。结果,约拿单为扫罗而战,最终与扫罗同归于尽,导致大卫悲痛欲绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Since its establishment in 1976, the Journal for the Study of the Old Testament has become widely regarded as offering the best in current, peer-reviewed scholarship on the Old Testament across a range of critical methodologies. Many original and creative approaches to the interpretation of the Old Testament literature and cognate fields of inquiry are pioneered in this journal, which showcases the work of both new and established scholars.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信