Uncovering clinical rehabilitation technology trends: field observations, mixed methods analysis, and data visualization.

Courtney Celian, Hannah Redd, Kevin Smaller, Partha Ryali, James Lanphier Patton, David Jay Reinkensmeyer, Miriam Rose Rafferty
{"title":"Uncovering clinical rehabilitation technology trends: field observations, mixed methods analysis, and data visualization.","authors":"Courtney Celian, Hannah Redd, Kevin Smaller, Partha Ryali, James Lanphier Patton, David Jay Reinkensmeyer, Miriam Rose Rafferty","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.05.24303809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To analyze real-world rehabilitation technology (RT) use, with a view toward enhancing RT development and adoption. Design: A convergent, mixed-methods study using direct field observations, semi-structured templates, and summative content analysis. Setting: Ten neurorehabilitation units in a single health system. Participants: 3 research clinicians (1OT, 2PTs) observed ~60 OTs and 70 PTs in inpatient; ~18 OTs and 30 PTs in outpatient. Interventions: Not applicable Main Outcome Measures: Characteristics of RT, time spent setting up and using RT, and clinician behaviors. Results: 90 distinct devices across 15 different focus areas were inventoried. 329 RT-uses were documented over 44 hours with 42% of inventoried devices used. RT was used more during interventions (72%) than measurement (28%). Intervention devices used frequently were balance/gait (39%), strength/endurance (30%), and transfer/mobility training (16%). Measurement devices were frequently used to measure vitals (83%), followed by grip strength (7%), and upper extremity function (5%). Device characteristics were predominately AC-powered (56%), actuated (57%), monitor-less (53%), multi-use (68%), and required little familiarization (57%). Set-up times were brief (mean = 3.8 and 0.8 for intervention and measurement, respectively); more time was spent with intervention RT (25.6) than measurement RT (7.3). RT nearly always involved verbal instructions (72%) with clinicians providing more feedback on performance (59.7%) than on results (30%). Therapists' attention was split evenly between direct attention towards the patient during clinician treatment (49.7%) and completing other tasks such as documentation (50%). Conclusions: Even in a tech-friendly hospital, majority of available RT were observed un-used, but identifying these usage patterns is crucial to predict eventual adoption of new designs from earlier stages of RT development. An interactive data visualization page supplement is provided to facilitate this study.","PeriodicalId":501453,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.05.24303809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze real-world rehabilitation technology (RT) use, with a view toward enhancing RT development and adoption. Design: A convergent, mixed-methods study using direct field observations, semi-structured templates, and summative content analysis. Setting: Ten neurorehabilitation units in a single health system. Participants: 3 research clinicians (1OT, 2PTs) observed ~60 OTs and 70 PTs in inpatient; ~18 OTs and 30 PTs in outpatient. Interventions: Not applicable Main Outcome Measures: Characteristics of RT, time spent setting up and using RT, and clinician behaviors. Results: 90 distinct devices across 15 different focus areas were inventoried. 329 RT-uses were documented over 44 hours with 42% of inventoried devices used. RT was used more during interventions (72%) than measurement (28%). Intervention devices used frequently were balance/gait (39%), strength/endurance (30%), and transfer/mobility training (16%). Measurement devices were frequently used to measure vitals (83%), followed by grip strength (7%), and upper extremity function (5%). Device characteristics were predominately AC-powered (56%), actuated (57%), monitor-less (53%), multi-use (68%), and required little familiarization (57%). Set-up times were brief (mean = 3.8 and 0.8 for intervention and measurement, respectively); more time was spent with intervention RT (25.6) than measurement RT (7.3). RT nearly always involved verbal instructions (72%) with clinicians providing more feedback on performance (59.7%) than on results (30%). Therapists' attention was split evenly between direct attention towards the patient during clinician treatment (49.7%) and completing other tasks such as documentation (50%). Conclusions: Even in a tech-friendly hospital, majority of available RT were observed un-used, but identifying these usage patterns is crucial to predict eventual adoption of new designs from earlier stages of RT development. An interactive data visualization page supplement is provided to facilitate this study.
揭示临床康复技术趋势:实地观察、混合方法分析和数据可视化。
目的:分析现实世界中康复技术(RT)的使用情况,以促进康复技术的开发和采用。设计:采用直接实地观察、半结构化模板和总结性内容分析等方法,进行融合式混合研究。研究环境:一个医疗系统中的十个神经康复科。参与者:3 名临床研究人员(1 名手术治疗师和 2 名康复治疗师)在住院部观察了约 60 名手术治疗师和 70 名康复治疗师;在门诊部观察了约 18 名手术治疗师和 30 名康复治疗师。干预措施:不适用 主要结果测量:RT 的特征、设置和使用 RT 所花费的时间以及临床医师的行为。结果对 15 个不同重点领域的 90 种不同设备进行了清查。在 44 个小时内记录了 329 次 RT 使用,使用了 42% 的库存设备。在干预过程中,RT 的使用率(72%)高于测量(28%)。常用的干预设备有平衡/步态(39%)、力量/耐力(30%)和转移/移动训练(16%)。测量设备常用于测量生命体征(83%),其次是握力(7%)和上肢功能(5%)。设备的特点主要是交流供电(56%)、驱动(57%)、无显示器(53%)、多用途(68%),并且几乎不需要熟悉(57%)。设置时间很短(干预和测量的平均时间分别为 3.8 和 0.8);干预 RT(25.6)比测量 RT(7.3)花费的时间更多。RT几乎总是涉及口头指导(72%),临床医生提供的表现反馈(59.7%)多于结果反馈(30%)。治疗师的注意力平均分配为临床治疗过程中对患者的直接关注(49.7%)和完成其他任务(如记录)(50%)。结论即使在技术友好型医院,大多数可用的 RT 也未被使用,但识别这些使用模式对于预测 RT 开发早期阶段新设计的最终采用情况至关重要。为促进这项研究,我们提供了一个交互式数据可视化页面补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信