Learning Guided Automated Reasoning: A Brief Survey

Lasse Blaauwbroek, David Cerna, Thibault Gauthier, Jan Jakubův, Cezary Kaliszyk, Martin Suda, Josef Urban
{"title":"Learning Guided Automated Reasoning: A Brief Survey","authors":"Lasse Blaauwbroek, David Cerna, Thibault Gauthier, Jan Jakubův, Cezary Kaliszyk, Martin Suda, Josef Urban","doi":"arxiv-2403.04017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automated theorem provers and formal proof assistants are general reasoning\nsystems that are in theory capable of proving arbitrarily hard theorems, thus\nsolving arbitrary problems reducible to mathematics and logical reasoning. In\npractice, such systems however face large combinatorial explosion, and\ntherefore include many heuristics and choice points that considerably influence\ntheir performance. This is an opportunity for trained machine learning\npredictors, which can guide the work of such reasoning systems. Conversely,\ndeductive search supported by the notion of logically valid proof allows one to\ntrain machine learning systems on large reasoning corpora. Such bodies of proof\nare usually correct by construction and when combined with more and more\nprecise trained guidance they can be boostrapped into very large corpora, with\nincreasingly long reasoning chains and possibly novel proof ideas. In this\npaper we provide an overview of several automated reasoning and theorem proving\ndomains and the learning and AI methods that have been so far developed for\nthem. These include premise selection, proof guidance in several settings, AI\nsystems and feedback loops iterating between reasoning and learning, and\nsymbolic classification problems.","PeriodicalId":501033,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Symbolic Computation","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Symbolic Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2403.04017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automated theorem provers and formal proof assistants are general reasoning systems that are in theory capable of proving arbitrarily hard theorems, thus solving arbitrary problems reducible to mathematics and logical reasoning. In practice, such systems however face large combinatorial explosion, and therefore include many heuristics and choice points that considerably influence their performance. This is an opportunity for trained machine learning predictors, which can guide the work of such reasoning systems. Conversely, deductive search supported by the notion of logically valid proof allows one to train machine learning systems on large reasoning corpora. Such bodies of proof are usually correct by construction and when combined with more and more precise trained guidance they can be boostrapped into very large corpora, with increasingly long reasoning chains and possibly novel proof ideas. In this paper we provide an overview of several automated reasoning and theorem proving domains and the learning and AI methods that have been so far developed for them. These include premise selection, proof guidance in several settings, AI systems and feedback loops iterating between reasoning and learning, and symbolic classification problems.
学习引导式自动推理:简要调查
自动定理证明器和形式化证明助手是通用推理系统,理论上能够证明任意困难的定理,从而解决可还原为数学和逻辑推理的任意问题。但在实践中,这类系统面临着巨大的组合爆炸,因此包含了许多启发式方法和选择点,对其性能产生了相当大的影响。这为训练有素的机器学习预测器提供了机会,它们可以指导这类推理系统的工作。相反,在逻辑上有效的证明概念支持下的演绎式搜索可以让我们在大型推理库中训练机器学习系统。这些证明体通常在构造上是正确的,当与越来越精确的训练指导相结合时,它们就能在越来越长的推理链和可能的新证明思想中,被提升为非常大的推理体。在本文中,我们概述了几种自动推理和定理证明领域,以及迄今为止为它们开发的学习和人工智能方法。这些方法包括前提选择、多种环境下的证明引导、在推理和学习之间迭代的人工智能系统和反馈回路,以及符号分类问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信