The Best Experiences Cannot be Planned: The Effect of Maximizing Vacation Planning on Consumer Satisfaction and Well-Being

Ondrej Mitas, Olivia Niemeyer, Jaime Kurtz
{"title":"The Best Experiences Cannot be Planned: The Effect of Maximizing Vacation Planning on Consumer Satisfaction and Well-Being","authors":"Ondrej Mitas, Olivia Niemeyer, Jaime Kurtz","doi":"10.1177/10963480241233506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maximizing theory differentiates between individuals who accept minimally sufficient purchase options and those who strive to maximize their value for money. Maximizers are less satisfied with their decisions and suffer diminished subjective well-being. We analyzed 376 questionnaires and conducted 12 interviews of working Germans to extend maximizing theory to vacations, which are more complex, experiential, and hedonic than products studied in previous research on maximizing. Path analysis of questionnaire data showed significant, negative indirect effects of maximizing on subjective well-being through aspects of the vacation decision process and subsequent vacation satisfaction. Deductive thematic analysis of interviews showed that maximizers’ time-consuming searching through alternatives created doubt and stringent expectations, thus explaining how maximizing degrades vacation satisfaction and subjective well-being. Thus, we suggest that individuals be conscious of the personal resources and expectations that they invest in vacation decisions. Furthermore, the tourism industry should emphasize inspiration and customization instead of variety.","PeriodicalId":517387,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480241233506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maximizing theory differentiates between individuals who accept minimally sufficient purchase options and those who strive to maximize their value for money. Maximizers are less satisfied with their decisions and suffer diminished subjective well-being. We analyzed 376 questionnaires and conducted 12 interviews of working Germans to extend maximizing theory to vacations, which are more complex, experiential, and hedonic than products studied in previous research on maximizing. Path analysis of questionnaire data showed significant, negative indirect effects of maximizing on subjective well-being through aspects of the vacation decision process and subsequent vacation satisfaction. Deductive thematic analysis of interviews showed that maximizers’ time-consuming searching through alternatives created doubt and stringent expectations, thus explaining how maximizing degrades vacation satisfaction and subjective well-being. Thus, we suggest that individuals be conscious of the personal resources and expectations that they invest in vacation decisions. Furthermore, the tourism industry should emphasize inspiration and customization instead of variety.
最好的体验无法计划:最大化假期规划对消费者满意度和幸福感的影响
最大化理论将个人分为两种,一种是接受最低限度的充分购买选择,另一种是努力实现资金价值最大化。最大化者对自己的决定不太满意,主观幸福感也会降低。我们对 376 份问卷进行了分析,并对工作中的德国人进行了 12 次访谈,目的是将最大化理论推广到假期中,因为假期比以往最大化研究中的产品更复杂、更具有体验性和享乐性。对问卷数据进行的路径分析显示,最大化通过度假决策过程的各个方面以及随后的度假满意度,对主观幸福感产生了显著的负向间接影响。对访谈进行的演绎式主题分析表明,最大化者耗费大量时间寻找备选方案的做法造成了怀疑和严格的期望,从而解释了最大化是如何降低度假满意度和主观幸福感的。因此,我们建议个人要意识到自己在度假决策中投入的个人资源和期望。此外,旅游业应强调灵感和定制化,而不是多样化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信