Intra-professional collaboration and organization of work among teachers: How entangled institutional logics shape connectivity

IF 2 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Karolina Parding, Mihajla Gavin, Rachel Wilson, Scott Fitzgerald, Mats Jakobsson, Susan McGrath-Champ
{"title":"Intra-professional collaboration and organization of work among teachers: How entangled institutional logics shape connectivity","authors":"Karolina Parding, Mihajla Gavin, Rachel Wilson, Scott Fitzgerald, Mats Jakobsson, Susan McGrath-Champ","doi":"10.1093/jpo/joae003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intra-professional collaboration is essential as it enables professionals to learn, develop, and define the terms of the profession in their own way. Yet conditions for collaboration are shaped by how work is organized and governed. This article examines how conditions for intra-professional collaboration, where work takes place with colleagues within the same profession in same or similar roles, are perceived by teachers, in relation to how work is organized, by drawing on empirical insights from a study on teachers working in education systems defined by market-driven reforms. Our findings nuance ideas of professional connectedness by showing how the organization of work, affected by ‘entangled institutional logics’ (Blomgren and Waks 2015; Alvehus and Andersson 2018) and market-based governance reforms, shapes intra-professional collaboration. Our contribution is thus to take departure from established understandings of connectivity, that is, ‘related to others and outsiders’ (Noordegraaf 2020) by examining connectivity within professions, showing how there continues to be a struggle between the profession, organization, and market which shapes conditions for intra-professional work within the teaching profession. Our analysis of intra-professional collaboration holds significance for emergent understandings of connectivity (see Adams et al. 2020a; Alvehus, Avoon and Oliver 2021: 201; Kanon and Andersson 2023) by underscoring how the contemporary organization and management of work shape the conditions that enable, or augment, inwards connectivity and the ability for professionals to collaborate in meaningful ways.","PeriodicalId":45650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professions and Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professions and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joae003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intra-professional collaboration is essential as it enables professionals to learn, develop, and define the terms of the profession in their own way. Yet conditions for collaboration are shaped by how work is organized and governed. This article examines how conditions for intra-professional collaboration, where work takes place with colleagues within the same profession in same or similar roles, are perceived by teachers, in relation to how work is organized, by drawing on empirical insights from a study on teachers working in education systems defined by market-driven reforms. Our findings nuance ideas of professional connectedness by showing how the organization of work, affected by ‘entangled institutional logics’ (Blomgren and Waks 2015; Alvehus and Andersson 2018) and market-based governance reforms, shapes intra-professional collaboration. Our contribution is thus to take departure from established understandings of connectivity, that is, ‘related to others and outsiders’ (Noordegraaf 2020) by examining connectivity within professions, showing how there continues to be a struggle between the profession, organization, and market which shapes conditions for intra-professional work within the teaching profession. Our analysis of intra-professional collaboration holds significance for emergent understandings of connectivity (see Adams et al. 2020a; Alvehus, Avoon and Oliver 2021: 201; Kanon and Andersson 2023) by underscoring how the contemporary organization and management of work shape the conditions that enable, or augment, inwards connectivity and the ability for professionals to collaborate in meaningful ways.
教师之间的专业内合作与工作安排:纠缠不清的制度逻辑如何塑造连通性
专业内的合作至关重要,因为它使专业人员能够以自己的方式学习、发展和确定专业的条件。然而,工作的组织和管理方式决定了合作的条件。本文通过对在市场驱动改革的教育体制下工作的教师的实证研究,探讨了教师是如何看待专业内合作的条件(即与同一专业的同事以相同或相似的角色开展工作)与工作组织方式的关系。我们的研究结果表明,受 "纠缠不清的制度逻辑"(Blomgren 和 Waks,2015 年;Alvehus 和 Andersson,2018 年)和基于市场的治理改革的影响,工作组织是如何塑造职业内部合作的,从而对职业关联性的观点进行了细化。因此,我们的贡献在于通过研究专业内部的连通性,跳出对连通性的既定理解,即 "与他人和局外人相关"(Noordegraaf,2020 年),展示了专业、组织和市场之间的斗争如何继续塑造着教师职业内部专业工作的条件。我们对专业内部合作的分析,强调了当代的工作组织和管理如何形成条件,促成或加强专业内部的连通性和专业人员以有意义的方式开展合作的能力,从而对连通性的新理解具有重要意义(见亚当斯等人,2020a;阿尔维胡斯、阿文和奥利弗,2021:201;卡农和安德森,2023)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
36.40%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信