Specific pelvic shape in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip on 3D morphometric homologous model analysis

Yui Sasaki, Daisuke Suzuki, Ryo Tokita, Hiroyuki Takashima, Hirofumi Matsumura, Satoshi Nagoya
{"title":"Specific pelvic shape in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip on 3D morphometric homologous model analysis","authors":"Yui Sasaki, Daisuke Suzuki, Ryo Tokita, Hiroyuki Takashima, Hirofumi Matsumura, Satoshi Nagoya","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.08.24303978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To clarify the morphological factors of the pelvis in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), three-dimensional (3D) pelvic morphology was analyzed using a template-fitting technique.\nMethods: Three-dimensional pelvic data of 50 patients with DDH (DDH group) and 3D pelvic data of 50 patients without obvious pelvic deformity (Normal group) were used. All patients were female. A template model was created by averaging the normal pelvises into a symmetrical and isotropic mesh. Next, 100 homologous models were generated by fitting the pelvic data of each group of patients to the template model. Principal component analysis was performed on the coordinates of each vertex (15,235 vertices) of the pelvic homologous model. In addition, a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated from the sensitivity of DDH positivity for each principal component, and principal components for which the area under the curve was significantly large were extracted (p<0.05). Finally, which components of the pelvic morphology frequently seen in DDH patients are related to these extracted principal components was evaluated.\nResults: The first, third, and sixth principal components showed significantly larger areas under the ROC curves. The morphology indicated by the first principal component was associated with a decrease in coxal inclination in both the coronal and horizontal planes. The third principal component was related to the sacral inclination in the sagittal plane. The sixth principal component was associated with narrowing of the superior part of the pelvis.\nConclusion: The most important factor in the difference between normal and DDH pelvises was the change in the coxal angle in both the coronal and horizontal planes. That is, in the anterior and superior views, the normal pelvis is a triangle, whereas in DDH, it was more like a quadrilateral.","PeriodicalId":501263,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.24303978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To clarify the morphological factors of the pelvis in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), three-dimensional (3D) pelvic morphology was analyzed using a template-fitting technique. Methods: Three-dimensional pelvic data of 50 patients with DDH (DDH group) and 3D pelvic data of 50 patients without obvious pelvic deformity (Normal group) were used. All patients were female. A template model was created by averaging the normal pelvises into a symmetrical and isotropic mesh. Next, 100 homologous models were generated by fitting the pelvic data of each group of patients to the template model. Principal component analysis was performed on the coordinates of each vertex (15,235 vertices) of the pelvic homologous model. In addition, a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated from the sensitivity of DDH positivity for each principal component, and principal components for which the area under the curve was significantly large were extracted (p<0.05). Finally, which components of the pelvic morphology frequently seen in DDH patients are related to these extracted principal components was evaluated. Results: The first, third, and sixth principal components showed significantly larger areas under the ROC curves. The morphology indicated by the first principal component was associated with a decrease in coxal inclination in both the coronal and horizontal planes. The third principal component was related to the sacral inclination in the sagittal plane. The sixth principal component was associated with narrowing of the superior part of the pelvis. Conclusion: The most important factor in the difference between normal and DDH pelvises was the change in the coxal angle in both the coronal and horizontal planes. That is, in the anterior and superior views, the normal pelvis is a triangle, whereas in DDH, it was more like a quadrilateral.
通过三维形态计量同源模型分析髋关节发育不良患者的特殊骨盆形状
目的:为明确髋关节发育不良(DDH)患者骨盆的形态因素,采用模板拟合技术分析了骨盆的三维(3D)形态:方法:采用 50 名髋关节发育不良患者(DDH 组)的三维骨盆数据和 50 名无明显骨盆畸形患者(正常组)的三维骨盆数据。所有患者均为女性。通过将正常骨盆平均分为对称和各向同性的网格,创建了一个模板模型。然后,将每组患者的骨盆数据与模板模型拟合,生成 100 个同源模型。对骨盆同源模型的每个顶点(15235 个顶点)的坐标进行主成分分析。此外,还根据每个主成分对 DDH 阳性的敏感性计算了接收者操作特征曲线(ROC),并提取了曲线下面积显著较大的主成分(p<0.05)。最后,对这些提取的主成分与 DDH 患者盆腔形态中常见的哪些成分有关进行了评估:结果:第一、第三和第六主成分在 ROC 曲线下显示出明显较大的区域。第一个主成分显示的形态与冠状面和水平面上髋关节倾斜度的减小有关。第三个主成分与矢状面上的骶骨倾斜度有关。第六个主成分与骨盆上部的狭窄有关:结论:正常骨盆和 DDH 骨盆之间差异的最重要因素是髋臼角在冠状面和水平面上的变化。也就是说,在前方和上方视图中,正常骨盆是一个三角形,而 DDH 骨盆则更像一个四边形。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信