Development of a Nomogram Model to Identify Appropriate Candidates from Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Database

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Kong Ren , Hao Ning , Hai-hu Wu , Fei Wu , Jia-ju Lyu
{"title":"Development of a Nomogram Model to Identify Appropriate Candidates from Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Database","authors":"Kong Ren ,&nbsp;Hao Ning ,&nbsp;Hai-hu Wu ,&nbsp;Fei Wu ,&nbsp;Jia-ju Lyu","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.02.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although a survival benefit was observed in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN), there is a lack of effective tools for predicting which individuals are likely to benefit from surgical intervention. Herein, we developed a predictive model using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Patients diagnosed with mRCC were screened from the SEER database (2010-2020), supplemented by patients from East Asia. Patients were categorized into surgical and non-surgical groups, with propensity score matching conducted to balance baseline characteristics. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with benefits and a nomogram was constructed based on these factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This study included 11,044 cases from the SEER database and 50 cases from an external validation cohort. CN was identified as an independent protective factor for OS. A nomogram was established, and it performed well in the training and validation sets. The calibration curves and DCA confirmed that the nomogram model could precisely predict the probability of surgical benefit. We used the nomogram to classify surgical patients into benefit and non-benefit groups. Then, we found that OS was significantly higher in the benefit group than in the non-benefit group. The external validation cohort observed the same result (P=0.035).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>While CN offers potential benefits for patients with mRCC, its applicability varies across the patient population. Our study constructed a nomogram that quantitatively assesses the likelihood of surgical benefit in mRCC patients, facilitating more tailored therapeutic decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767324000363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Although a survival benefit was observed in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN), there is a lack of effective tools for predicting which individuals are likely to benefit from surgical intervention. Herein, we developed a predictive model using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

Materials and Methods

Patients diagnosed with mRCC were screened from the SEER database (2010-2020), supplemented by patients from East Asia. Patients were categorized into surgical and non-surgical groups, with propensity score matching conducted to balance baseline characteristics. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with benefits and a nomogram was constructed based on these factors.

Results

This study included 11,044 cases from the SEER database and 50 cases from an external validation cohort. CN was identified as an independent protective factor for OS. A nomogram was established, and it performed well in the training and validation sets. The calibration curves and DCA confirmed that the nomogram model could precisely predict the probability of surgical benefit. We used the nomogram to classify surgical patients into benefit and non-benefit groups. Then, we found that OS was significantly higher in the benefit group than in the non-benefit group. The external validation cohort observed the same result (P=0.035).

Conclusion

While CN offers potential benefits for patients with mRCC, its applicability varies across the patient population. Our study constructed a nomogram that quantitatively assesses the likelihood of surgical benefit in mRCC patients, facilitating more tailored therapeutic decision-making.

基于 "监测、流行病学和最终结果 "数据库,建立一个提名图模型,以确定转移性肾细胞癌细胞切除肾切除术的合适人选
这项研究旨在评估与转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)细胞切除肾切除术(CN)相关的预后增强效应,并建立一个预测提名图,用于确定哪些患者最有可能从细胞切除肾切除术中获益。虽然在接受细胞切除肾切除术(CN)的转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者中观察到了生存获益,但缺乏有效的工具来预测哪些人可能从手术干预中获益。在此,我们利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中的数据开发了一个预测模型。我们从 SEER 数据库(2010-2020 年)中筛选出被诊断为 mRCC 的患者,并补充了来自东亚的患者。患者被分为手术组和非手术组,并进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)以平衡基线特征。通过逻辑回归分析确定了与获益相关的独立因素,并根据这些因素构建了提名图。这项研究包括 SEER 数据库中的 11,044 例病例和外部验证队列中的 50 例病例。CN被确定为OS的独立保护因素(P<0.001)。建立的提名图在训练集和验证集中表现良好(AUC:0.786 和 0.761)。校准曲线和 DCA 证实,提名图模型可以精确预测手术获益的概率。我们使用提名图将手术患者分为获益组和非获益组。然后,我们发现获益组的 OS 明显高于非获益组。外部验证队列也观察到了同样的结果(P=0.035)。虽然 CN 可为 mRCC 患者带来潜在益处,但其适用性因患者群体而异。我们的研究构建了一个提名图,对mRCC患者手术获益的可能性进行定量评估,从而有助于做出更有针对性的治疗决策。我们的研究表明,CN 可改善 mRCC 的预后,但只有特定患者才能从 CN 中获益。目前还没有预测工具来确定哪些患者会受益。因此,我们的目标是利用 SEER 数据库中的数据开发一个提名图,以确定可从 CN 中获益的 mRCC 患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信