Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation (SLAPPs), the Governance of Historical Memory in the Rule of Law Crisis, and the EU Anti-SLAPP Directive

IF 1.6 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

European Constitutional Law Review Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1017/s1574019624000063

Adam Bodnar, Aleksandra Gliszczyńska-Grabias

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation (SLAPPs) – the rule of law backsliding – governance of historical memory – academic freedom – EU Draft Directive on protecting persons who engage in public participation from manifestly unfounded or abusive court proceedings

查看原文本刊更多论文

反对公众参与的战略性诉讼（SLAPPs）、法治危机中的历史记忆治理以及欧盟反 SLAPP 指令

反对公众参与的策略性诉讼（SLAPPs）--法治的倒退--历史记忆的管理--学术自由--欧盟关于保护公众参与人员免受明显无根据或滥用性法庭诉讼的指令草案

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Constitutional Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), a peer reviewed English language journal, is a platform for advancing the study of European constitutional law, its history and evolution. Its scope is European law and constitutional law, history and theory, comparative law and jurisprudence. Published triannually, it contains articles on doctrine, scholarship and history, plus jurisprudence and book reviews. However, the premier issue includes more than twenty short articles by leading experts, each addressing a single topic in the Draft Constitutional Treaty for Europe. EuConst is addressed at academics, professionals, politicians and others involved or interested in the European constitutional process.