The effect of fracture aperture and matrix permeability on suitability of the equivalent porous medium model for steady-state flow in fractured porous media

IF 2.4 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Di Han, Lei Ma, Jiazhong Qian, Di Gao, Haichun Ma, Qiankun Luo, Pengyu Qiu
{"title":"The effect of fracture aperture and matrix permeability on suitability of the equivalent porous medium model for steady-state flow in fractured porous media","authors":"Di Han, Lei Ma, Jiazhong Qian, Di Gao, Haichun Ma, Qiankun Luo, Pengyu Qiu","doi":"10.1007/s10040-024-02781-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The equivalent porous medium (EPM) method is an efficient approximate processing method for calculating groundwater yield taking into account the equivalent permeability coefficient of a fractured geological medium. The EPM method finds wide application in addressing various hydrogeological problems ranging from local to regional scales; however, the adequacy of the EPM model for evaluating water head and velocity distributions has not been comprehensively assessed. This study quantitatively investigated the influence of fracture and matrix permeability on the EPM model’s suitability, defined by a 15% threshold for hydraulic-head prediction error, via numerical simulations. A fractured porous media system (fracture-matrix system) was considered as the prototype, and the EPM model simulation results were compared with those obtained using the discrete fracture-matrix (DFM) model. Results indicate a decrease in EPM suitability with larger fracture apertures. With a constant fracture aperture, the suitability of the EPM model increases as the matrix permeability increases. The size of the fracture aperture significantly affects the suitability of the EPM model, and it determines the point at which its suitability begins to increase and eventually stabilize. The fitted curve depicting the influence of matrix permeability on the suitability of the EPM model conforms to the Boltzmann formula, and the fracture aperture is linearly related to the parameter <i>x</i><sub>0</sub> in the formula. The derived empirical formula enables quantitative assessment of the impact of fracture and matrix permeabilities on the suitability of the EPM model in fractured porous media.</p>","PeriodicalId":13013,"journal":{"name":"Hydrogeology Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrogeology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-024-02781-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The equivalent porous medium (EPM) method is an efficient approximate processing method for calculating groundwater yield taking into account the equivalent permeability coefficient of a fractured geological medium. The EPM method finds wide application in addressing various hydrogeological problems ranging from local to regional scales; however, the adequacy of the EPM model for evaluating water head and velocity distributions has not been comprehensively assessed. This study quantitatively investigated the influence of fracture and matrix permeability on the EPM model’s suitability, defined by a 15% threshold for hydraulic-head prediction error, via numerical simulations. A fractured porous media system (fracture-matrix system) was considered as the prototype, and the EPM model simulation results were compared with those obtained using the discrete fracture-matrix (DFM) model. Results indicate a decrease in EPM suitability with larger fracture apertures. With a constant fracture aperture, the suitability of the EPM model increases as the matrix permeability increases. The size of the fracture aperture significantly affects the suitability of the EPM model, and it determines the point at which its suitability begins to increase and eventually stabilize. The fitted curve depicting the influence of matrix permeability on the suitability of the EPM model conforms to the Boltzmann formula, and the fracture aperture is linearly related to the parameter x0 in the formula. The derived empirical formula enables quantitative assessment of the impact of fracture and matrix permeabilities on the suitability of the EPM model in fractured porous media.

Abstract Image

断裂孔径和基质渗透性对等效多孔介质模型在断裂多孔介质稳态流动中适用性的影响
等效多孔介质法(EPM)是一种计算地下水产量的高效近似处理方法,它考虑到了断裂地质介质的等效渗透系数。等效多孔介质法广泛应用于解决从局部到区域范围的各种水文地质问题;然而,等效多孔介质法模型在评估水头和流速分布方面的适当性尚未得到全面评估。本研究通过数值模拟,定量研究了断裂和基质渗透率对 EPM 模型适用性的影响(以 15%的水头预测误差为临界值)。以断裂多孔介质系统(断裂-基质系统)为原型,将 EPM 模型模拟结果与使用离散断裂-基质(DFM)模型获得的结果进行比较。结果表明,断裂孔径越大,EPM 的适用性越低。在断裂孔径不变的情况下,EPM 模型的适用性随着基质渗透率的增加而增加。断裂孔径的大小对 EPM 模型的适用性有很大影响,决定了其适用性开始增加并最终趋于稳定的时间点。描绘基质渗透率对 EPM 模型适用性影响的拟合曲线符合玻尔兹曼公式,裂缝孔径与公式中的参数 x0 呈线性关系。推导出的经验公式可以定量评估断裂和基质渗透率对 EPM 模型在断裂多孔介质中适用性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hydrogeology Journal
Hydrogeology Journal 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Hydrogeology Journal was founded in 1992 to foster understanding of hydrogeology; to describe worldwide progress in hydrogeology; and to provide an accessible forum for scientists, researchers, engineers, and practitioners in developing and industrialized countries. Since then, the journal has earned a large worldwide readership. Its peer-reviewed research articles integrate subsurface hydrology and geology with supporting disciplines: geochemistry, geophysics, geomorphology, geobiology, surface-water hydrology, tectonics, numerical modeling, economics, and sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信