Numerical simulation of wave interactions with floating offshore renewable energy structures: A comparative study between a Particle-based PIC model and OpenFOAM

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Haoyu Ding , Qiang Chen , Jun Zang
{"title":"Numerical simulation of wave interactions with floating offshore renewable energy structures: A comparative study between a Particle-based PIC model and OpenFOAM","authors":"Haoyu Ding ,&nbsp;Qiang Chen ,&nbsp;Jun Zang","doi":"10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2024.104092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mesh-based Eulerian and particle-based Lagrangian models are common computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools for simulating wave-structure interactions. While Eulerian models are efficient in terms of computational time, they are limited in their ability to handle large interface discontinuities between two flows and complex structure motion responses. Conversely, Lagrangian models are suitable for such discontinuities and motion responses but can be computationally expensive. However, there is a lack of comprehensive discussion on the (dis)advantages of hybrid Eulerian-Lagrangian models, which have the potential to achieve both numerical efficiency and flexibility through a combined use of mesh and particles. This paper presents a comparative study of a hybrid Eulerian-Lagrangian Particle-In-Cell (PIC) model and the widely-used OpenFOAM model, applied to a variety of complex wave interactions with floating offshore renewable energy structures in both 2D and fully 3D domains. We found that both models demonstrate good performance in simulating complex floating structures. Additionally, it is the first time that the two models have been compared in parallel on the same computing facility, allowing us to directly show their computational efficiency. The PIC model has the advantage of using staggered grids, which enables it to achieve computational efficiency comparable to the pure mesh-based OpenFOAM. The findings of this study provide researchers and practitioners in the field of computational fluid dynamics with a clear understanding of the performance of the hybrid Eulerian-Lagrangian PIC model and OpenFOAM for simulating complex fluid-structure interaction problems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fluids and Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889974624000276/pdfft?md5=5bf1cb555cd54bc922c5bc5b4e59bab8&pid=1-s2.0-S0889974624000276-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fluids and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889974624000276","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mesh-based Eulerian and particle-based Lagrangian models are common computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools for simulating wave-structure interactions. While Eulerian models are efficient in terms of computational time, they are limited in their ability to handle large interface discontinuities between two flows and complex structure motion responses. Conversely, Lagrangian models are suitable for such discontinuities and motion responses but can be computationally expensive. However, there is a lack of comprehensive discussion on the (dis)advantages of hybrid Eulerian-Lagrangian models, which have the potential to achieve both numerical efficiency and flexibility through a combined use of mesh and particles. This paper presents a comparative study of a hybrid Eulerian-Lagrangian Particle-In-Cell (PIC) model and the widely-used OpenFOAM model, applied to a variety of complex wave interactions with floating offshore renewable energy structures in both 2D and fully 3D domains. We found that both models demonstrate good performance in simulating complex floating structures. Additionally, it is the first time that the two models have been compared in parallel on the same computing facility, allowing us to directly show their computational efficiency. The PIC model has the advantage of using staggered grids, which enables it to achieve computational efficiency comparable to the pure mesh-based OpenFOAM. The findings of this study provide researchers and practitioners in the field of computational fluid dynamics with a clear understanding of the performance of the hybrid Eulerian-Lagrangian PIC model and OpenFOAM for simulating complex fluid-structure interaction problems.

波浪与漂浮式海上可再生能源结构相互作用的数值模拟:基于粒子的 PIC 模型与 OpenFOAM 的比较研究
基于网格的欧拉模型和基于粒子的拉格朗日模型是模拟波浪与结构相互作用的常用计算流体动力学(CFD)工具。虽然欧拉模型在计算时间方面效率高,但在处理两股气流之间的大界面不连续性和复杂结构运动响应方面能力有限。相反,拉格朗日模型适用于此类不连续性和运动响应,但计算成本较高。然而,对于欧拉-拉格朗日混合模型的(不)优势缺乏全面的讨论,这些模型有可能通过结合使用网格和粒子实现数值效率和灵活性。本文介绍了欧拉-拉格朗日混合粒子内胞(PIC)模型与广泛使用的 OpenFOAM 模型的比较研究,并将其应用于二维和全三维域中浮动海上可再生能源结构与各种复杂波浪的相互作用。我们发现,这两种模型在模拟复杂浮动结构时都表现出了良好的性能。此外,这是首次在同一计算设施上对两种模型进行并行比较,使我们能够直接显示它们的计算效率。PIC 模型的优势在于使用交错网格,这使其计算效率可与基于纯网格的 OpenFOAM 相媲美。这项研究的结果让计算流体力学领域的研究人员和从业人员清楚地了解了欧拉-拉格朗日混合 PIC 模型和 OpenFOAM 在模拟复杂流固耦合问题时的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Fluids and Structures
Journal of Fluids and Structures 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
173
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Fluids and Structures serves as a focal point and a forum for the exchange of ideas, for the many kinds of specialists and practitioners concerned with fluid–structure interactions and the dynamics of systems related thereto, in any field. One of its aims is to foster the cross–fertilization of ideas, methods and techniques in the various disciplines involved. The journal publishes papers that present original and significant contributions on all aspects of the mechanical interactions between fluids and solids, regardless of scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信