Family Veto in Organ Donation.

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
Journal of Law and Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-01
David Ernest
{"title":"Family Veto in Organ Donation.","authors":"David Ernest","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A current inconsistency in organ donation is the ability for a family to veto a valid consent for organ donation by a deceased individual; yet the family is unable to veto a valid refusal. Reasons proposed for accepting or rejecting family veto include concerns regarding distress (individual's family vs potential recipients), impact on organ donation rates, and regard for the deceased individual's autonomy. Advance care directives (ACDs) provide an ethical and legal framework for documenting medical treatment decisions which allow an individual to provide directives and to appoint a medical treatment decision-maker to act on their behalf. I argue that consent for organ donation as an ACD under the Medical Treatment Planning and Decisions Act 2016 (Vic) addresses the arguments in support of family veto. This may be an effective ethical and legal framework for managing family veto to meet the needs of the individual, family and community more effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"30 4","pages":"899-906"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A current inconsistency in organ donation is the ability for a family to veto a valid consent for organ donation by a deceased individual; yet the family is unable to veto a valid refusal. Reasons proposed for accepting or rejecting family veto include concerns regarding distress (individual's family vs potential recipients), impact on organ donation rates, and regard for the deceased individual's autonomy. Advance care directives (ACDs) provide an ethical and legal framework for documenting medical treatment decisions which allow an individual to provide directives and to appoint a medical treatment decision-maker to act on their behalf. I argue that consent for organ donation as an ACD under the Medical Treatment Planning and Decisions Act 2016 (Vic) addresses the arguments in support of family veto. This may be an effective ethical and legal framework for managing family veto to meet the needs of the individual, family and community more effectively.

器官捐赠中的家庭否决权。
目前,器官捐献中的一个不一致之处是,家属可以否决已故者器官捐献的有效同意;但家属却不能否决有效的拒绝。接受或拒绝家属否决的理由包括对痛苦的担忧(个人家属与潜在接受者)、对器官捐献率的影响以及对死者自主权的考虑。预先护理指示(Advance Care Directives,ACD)为记录医疗决定提供了一个伦理和法律框架,允许个人提供指示,并指定一名医疗决策者代表他们行事。我认为,根据《2016 年医疗计划和决定法》(维多利亚州),器官捐赠同意书作为一种 ACD,解决了支持家庭否决权的论点。这可能是管理家庭否决权的有效伦理和法律框架,以更有效地满足个人、家庭和社区的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信