Sympatry in a nightingale contact zone has no effect on host-specific blood parasite prevalence and lineage diversity

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PARASITOLOGY
William Jones , Radka Reifová , Jiří Reif , Petr Synek , Michal Šíma , Pavel Munclinger
{"title":"Sympatry in a nightingale contact zone has no effect on host-specific blood parasite prevalence and lineage diversity","authors":"William Jones ,&nbsp;Radka Reifová ,&nbsp;Jiří Reif ,&nbsp;Petr Synek ,&nbsp;Michal Šíma ,&nbsp;Pavel Munclinger","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpara.2024.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Parasites are a key driving force behind many ecological and evolutionary processes. Prevalence and diversity of parasites, as well as their effects on hosts, are not uniform across host species. As such, the potential parasite spillover between species can significantly influence outcomes of interspecific interactions. We screened two species of <em>Luscinia</em> nightingales for haemosporidian blood parasites (<em>Plasmodium, Leucocytozoon</em> and <em>Haemoproteus</em>) along an approximately 3000 km transect in Europe, incorporating areas of host distant allopatry, close allopatry and sympatry. We found significant differences in infection rates between the two host species, with common nightingales having much lower parasite prevalence than thrush nightingales (36.7% versus 83.8%). This disparity was mostly driven by <em>Haemoproteus</em> prevalence, which was significantly higher in thrush nightingales while common nightingales had a small, but significantly higher, <em>Plasmodium</em> prevalence. Furthermore, we found no effect of proximity to the contact zone on infection rate in either host species. Despite having lower infection prevalence, common nightingales were infected with a significantly higher diversity of parasite lineages than thrush nightingales, and lineage assemblages differed considerably between the two species, even in sympatry. This pattern was mostly driven by the large diversity of comparatively rare lineages, while the most abundant lineages were shared between the two host species. This suggests that, despite the close evolutionary relationships between the two nightingales, there are significant differences in parasite prevalence and diversity, regardless of the distance from the contact zone. This suggests that spillover of haemosporidian blood parasites is unlikely to contribute towards interspecific interactions in this system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13725,"journal":{"name":"International journal for parasitology","volume":"54 7","pages":"Pages 357-366"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal for parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020751924000523","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parasites are a key driving force behind many ecological and evolutionary processes. Prevalence and diversity of parasites, as well as their effects on hosts, are not uniform across host species. As such, the potential parasite spillover between species can significantly influence outcomes of interspecific interactions. We screened two species of Luscinia nightingales for haemosporidian blood parasites (Plasmodium, Leucocytozoon and Haemoproteus) along an approximately 3000 km transect in Europe, incorporating areas of host distant allopatry, close allopatry and sympatry. We found significant differences in infection rates between the two host species, with common nightingales having much lower parasite prevalence than thrush nightingales (36.7% versus 83.8%). This disparity was mostly driven by Haemoproteus prevalence, which was significantly higher in thrush nightingales while common nightingales had a small, but significantly higher, Plasmodium prevalence. Furthermore, we found no effect of proximity to the contact zone on infection rate in either host species. Despite having lower infection prevalence, common nightingales were infected with a significantly higher diversity of parasite lineages than thrush nightingales, and lineage assemblages differed considerably between the two species, even in sympatry. This pattern was mostly driven by the large diversity of comparatively rare lineages, while the most abundant lineages were shared between the two host species. This suggests that, despite the close evolutionary relationships between the two nightingales, there are significant differences in parasite prevalence and diversity, regardless of the distance from the contact zone. This suggests that spillover of haemosporidian blood parasites is unlikely to contribute towards interspecific interactions in this system.

Abstract Image

夜莺接触区的共生对宿主特异性血液寄生虫的流行和血系多样性没有影响。
寄生虫是许多生态和进化过程背后的关键驱动力。寄生虫的流行率和多样性及其对宿主的影响在宿主物种之间并不一致。因此,物种间潜在的寄生虫外溢会极大地影响种间相互作用的结果。我们沿欧洲约 3000 公里的横断面对两种夜莺进行了血孢子虫血液寄生虫(疟原虫、白细胞虫和血蛋白虫)筛查,其中包括宿主远距离异配、近距离异配和同配的区域。我们发现,两种宿主的感染率存在显著差异,普通夜莺的寄生虫感染率(36.7% 对 83.8%)远低于鸫夜莺。造成这种差异的主要原因是鸫夜莺的血吸虫感染率明显较高,而普通夜莺的疟原虫感染率较低,但也明显较高。此外,我们还发现,接触区的远近对两种宿主的感染率都没有影响。尽管普通夜莺的感染率较低,但其感染的寄生虫品系的多样性却明显高于鸫夜莺,而且这两个物种之间的寄生虫品系组合差异很大,即使在同域中也是如此。这种模式主要是由相对稀有的寄生虫系的巨大多样性造成的,而最丰富的寄生虫系则在两个宿主物种之间共享。这表明,尽管两种夜莺之间的进化关系密切,但无论距离接触区多远,寄生虫的流行率和多样性都存在显著差异。这表明,血孢子虫血液寄生虫的外溢不太可能导致该系统中的种间相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.50%
发文量
76
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: International Journal for Parasitology offers authors the option to sponsor nonsubscriber access to their articles on Elsevier electronic publishing platforms. For more information please view our Sponsored Articles page. The International Journal for Parasitology publishes the results of original research in all aspects of basic and applied parasitology, including all the fields covered by its Specialist Editors, and ranging from parasites and host-parasite relationships of intrinsic biological interest to those of social and economic importance in human and veterinary medicine and agriculture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信