Construction and Initial Examination of Inter-Rater Reliability of a Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5-TR Sleep Disorders (SCISD) - Kid.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Behavioral Sleep Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1080/15402002.2024.2324035
Mollie E Rischard, Tara R Buck, Kristi E Pruiksma, Aviva Johns, Lisa D Cromer
{"title":"Construction and Initial Examination of Inter-Rater Reliability of a Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5-TR Sleep Disorders (SCISD) - Kid.","authors":"Mollie E Rischard, Tara R Buck, Kristi E Pruiksma, Aviva Johns, Lisa D Cromer","doi":"10.1080/15402002.2024.2324035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>To construct and evaluate the inter-rater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5-TR Sleep Disorders - Kid (SCISD-Kid).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The SCISD-Kid was modeled on the adult SCISD-R and accounted for pediatric developmental and sociocultural factors. Fifty sleep-disturbed children (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 11.9, <i>SD</i> = 2.9) and 50 caregivers responded to the final SCISD-Kid. Video recordings were double-scored to evaluate inter-rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final SCISD-Kid contained approximately 90 questions. Eight of the nine covered disorders had prevalence rates sufficient for analyses for both samples (i.e., <i>k</i> > 2). Inter-rater reliability was examined using Cohen kappa coefficients (κ); reliability estimates ranged from excellent to good. For youth, restless legs syndrome yielded the lowest reliability (.48), while nightmare disorder, narcolepsy, and NREM sleep arousal disorder - sleepwalking type showed the highest reliability (1.00). Across caregivers, NREM sleep arousal disorder - sleep terror type (.49) and hypersomnolence (.54) had the lowest reliability. In contrast, circadian rhythm - delayed sleep phase type, nightmare disorder, and NREM sleep arousal disorder - sleepwalking type showed the highest reliability (1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SCISD-Kid is a promising tool for screening sleep disorders. It showed good to excellent reliability across both samples. Next steps for validation will be discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":55393,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sleep Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"593-610"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15402002.2024.2324035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives: To construct and evaluate the inter-rater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5-TR Sleep Disorders - Kid (SCISD-Kid).

Method: The SCISD-Kid was modeled on the adult SCISD-R and accounted for pediatric developmental and sociocultural factors. Fifty sleep-disturbed children (Mage = 11.9, SD = 2.9) and 50 caregivers responded to the final SCISD-Kid. Video recordings were double-scored to evaluate inter-rater reliability.

Results: The final SCISD-Kid contained approximately 90 questions. Eight of the nine covered disorders had prevalence rates sufficient for analyses for both samples (i.e., k > 2). Inter-rater reliability was examined using Cohen kappa coefficients (κ); reliability estimates ranged from excellent to good. For youth, restless legs syndrome yielded the lowest reliability (.48), while nightmare disorder, narcolepsy, and NREM sleep arousal disorder - sleepwalking type showed the highest reliability (1.00). Across caregivers, NREM sleep arousal disorder - sleep terror type (.49) and hypersomnolence (.54) had the lowest reliability. In contrast, circadian rhythm - delayed sleep phase type, nightmare disorder, and NREM sleep arousal disorder - sleepwalking type showed the highest reliability (1.00).

Conclusions: The SCISD-Kid is a promising tool for screening sleep disorders. It showed good to excellent reliability across both samples. Next steps for validation will be discussed.

DSM-5-TR睡眠障碍结构化临床访谈(SCISD)的构建及评分者间可靠性的初步检验 - Kid。
研究目的构建并评估DSM-5-TR睡眠障碍结构化临床访谈-儿童(SCISD-Kid)的评分者间可靠性:方法:SCISD-Kid以成人SCISD-R为模型,并考虑了儿童发育和社会文化因素。50名睡眠障碍儿童(平均年龄=11.9岁,标准差=2.9岁)和50名照顾者对最终的SCISD-Kid做出了回答。视频记录经过双重评分,以评估评分者之间的可靠性:最终的 SCISD-Kid 包含约 90 个问题。在涵盖的九种疾病中,有八种疾病的患病率足以对两个样本进行分析(即 k > 2)。使用科恩卡帕系数(κ)对评分者之间的可靠性进行了检验;可靠性估计值从优秀到良好不等。对于青少年来说,不宁腿综合征的可靠性最低(0.48),而噩梦障碍、嗜睡症和 NREM 睡眠唤醒障碍--梦游型的可靠性最高(1.00)。在所有护理人员中,NREM 睡眠唤醒障碍--睡眠恐怖型(0.49)和嗜睡症(0.54)的可靠性最低。相比之下,昼夜节律--睡眠阶段延迟型、噩梦障碍和 NREM 睡眠唤醒障碍--梦游型的可靠性最高(1.00):SCISD-Kid 是一种很有前途的睡眠障碍筛查工具。结论:SCISD-Kid 是一种很有前途的睡眠障碍筛查工具,在两个样本中都表现出良好甚至极佳的可靠性。接下来将讨论验证的步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Sleep Medicine
Behavioral Sleep Medicine CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioral Sleep Medicine addresses behavioral dimensions of normal and abnormal sleep mechanisms and the prevention, assessment, and treatment of sleep disorders and associated behavioral and emotional problems. Standards for interventions acceptable to this journal are guided by established principles of behavior change. Intending to serve as the intellectual home for the application of behavioral/cognitive science to the study of normal and disordered sleep, the journal paints a broad stroke across the behavioral sleep medicine landscape. Its content includes scholarly investigation of such areas as normal sleep experience, insomnia, the relation of daytime functioning to sleep, parasomnias, circadian rhythm disorders, treatment adherence, pediatrics, and geriatrics. Multidisciplinary approaches are particularly welcome. The journal’ domain encompasses human basic, applied, and clinical outcome research. Behavioral Sleep Medicine also embraces methodological diversity, spanning innovative case studies, quasi-experimentation, randomized trials, epidemiology, and critical reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信