Effect of gutta-percha solvents on the push-out bond strength to root dentin of a syringe-mixed resin sealer and premixed bioceramic sealer.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2024-02-01
Zeti Adura Che Ab Aziz, Eshana Bannerjee Nair, Myrna Nurlatifah Zakaria, Nora Sakina Mohd Noor, Noor Hayati Azami
{"title":"Effect of gutta-percha solvents on the push-out bond strength to root dentin of a syringe-mixed resin sealer and premixed bioceramic sealer.","authors":"Zeti Adura Che Ab Aziz, Eshana Bannerjee Nair, Myrna Nurlatifah Zakaria, Nora Sakina Mohd Noor, Noor Hayati Azami","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the push out bond strength (POBS) of a syringe-mixed resin sealer and a premixed bioceramic sealer to root dentin exposed to different gutta-percha (GP) solvents and to determine the mode of failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 200 horizontal root slices (1 mm thickness) were prepared up to size 40, 0.04 taper and randomly divided into four main groups based on solvent (Endosolv, orange oil, chloroform) and control (saline), then subdivided into two subgroups based on sealer type (AH Plus Jet and iRoot SP). Samples were exposed to respective solvents for 5 minutes and after the final rinsing, canal spaces were filled with either AH Plus Jet or iRoot SP. POBS test was performed 2 weeks after incubation and mode of failure following POBS test was evaluated. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Dunnett post hoc analysis (P< 0.05). Failure mode patterns were categorized as adhesive, cohesive and mixed failures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference (P> 0.05) in POBS between all solvent groups against the control in both AH Plus Jet and iRoot SP groups. Regardless of the use of solvents, AH Plus Jet group had significantly higher bond strength (P< 0.001) compared to iRoot SP group. The predominant mode of failure was mixed failure in all groups irrespective of type of sealer and exposure to solvents.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This study showed that exposure to gutta-percha solvents (chloroform, orange oil and Endosolv) for 5 minutes did not affect the bond strengths of both iRoot SP (bioceramic sealer) and AH Plus (resin sealer) to root dentin.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"37 1","pages":"35-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the push out bond strength (POBS) of a syringe-mixed resin sealer and a premixed bioceramic sealer to root dentin exposed to different gutta-percha (GP) solvents and to determine the mode of failure.

Methods: A total of 200 horizontal root slices (1 mm thickness) were prepared up to size 40, 0.04 taper and randomly divided into four main groups based on solvent (Endosolv, orange oil, chloroform) and control (saline), then subdivided into two subgroups based on sealer type (AH Plus Jet and iRoot SP). Samples were exposed to respective solvents for 5 minutes and after the final rinsing, canal spaces were filled with either AH Plus Jet or iRoot SP. POBS test was performed 2 weeks after incubation and mode of failure following POBS test was evaluated. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Dunnett post hoc analysis (P< 0.05). Failure mode patterns were categorized as adhesive, cohesive and mixed failures.

Results: There was no significant difference (P> 0.05) in POBS between all solvent groups against the control in both AH Plus Jet and iRoot SP groups. Regardless of the use of solvents, AH Plus Jet group had significantly higher bond strength (P< 0.001) compared to iRoot SP group. The predominant mode of failure was mixed failure in all groups irrespective of type of sealer and exposure to solvents.

Clinical significance: This study showed that exposure to gutta-percha solvents (chloroform, orange oil and Endosolv) for 5 minutes did not affect the bond strengths of both iRoot SP (bioceramic sealer) and AH Plus (resin sealer) to root dentin.

古塔漆溶剂对注射器混合树脂封闭剂和预混合生物陶瓷封闭剂与根部牙本质的推出粘接强度的影响。
目的:评估注射器混合树脂封闭剂和预混合生物陶瓷封闭剂与暴露于不同古塔波卡(GP)溶剂中的根部牙本质的推出粘接强度(POBS),并确定失效模式:共制备了 200 个水平根切片(厚度为 1 毫米),大小为 40,锥度为 0.04,根据溶剂(Endosolv、橙油、氯仿)和对照(生理盐水)随机分为四个主要组,然后根据封闭剂类型(AH Plus Jet 和 iRoot SP)再分为两个亚组。将样品暴露在相应的溶剂中 5 分钟,最后冲洗后,用 AH Plus Jet 或 iRoot SP 填满管腔。培养 2 周后进行 POBS 测试,并评估 POBS 测试后的失效模式。数据分析采用双向方差分析和邓尼特事后分析(P< 0.05)。失效模式分为粘附性失效、内聚性失效和混合性失效:所有溶剂组与对照组相比,AH Plus Jet 组和 iRoot SP 组的 POBS 均无明显差异(P> 0.05)。无论使用哪种溶剂,AH Plus Jet 组的粘接强度都明显高于 iRoot SP 组(P< 0.001)。在所有组别中,无论密封剂的类型和接触溶剂的情况如何,主要的失败模式都是混合失败:这项研究表明,暴露于古塔漆溶剂(氯仿、橘子油和 Endosolv)5 分钟不会影响 iRoot SP(生物陶瓷封闭剂)和 AH Plus(树脂封闭剂)与根部牙本质的粘结强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信