Effect of group and individual education on shade matching competency of dental students.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2024-02-01
Ivan S Ristić, Maria Gonzalez, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Rade Paravina
{"title":"Effect of group and individual education on shade matching competency of dental students.","authors":"Ivan S Ristić, Maria Gonzalez, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Rade Paravina","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the influence of group and individual education on shade matching quality using a visual color competency test to match shade tab pairs from two Vita classical A1-D4 shade guides.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>60 dental students, 21-25 years old (39 females, 21 males) participated in the study. All participants passed a color deficiency test before the experiment. The examination was voluntary and approved by the corresponding Ethics Committee. Students were randomly divided into three groups (n=20): one control group, NE (no education) and two experimental groups - GE (group education) and IE (individual education). The study was performed in three phases. In the \"before\" (B - Phase 1) and \"after\" (A - Phase 3) phase, all groups had to match 16 pairs of tabs from two Vita classical A1-D4 shade guides, with the shade designations hidden by custom letter markings. All tabs were mixed on a gray surface illuminated by color-correcting light. In Phase 2 (between B and A), GE had only group education, while IE received additional individual education and training. The control group did not participate in Phase 2. Means and standard deviations were calculated, and differences were compared using the one-way ANOVA, ANCOVA test, and Student t-test for dependent samples (α= 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NE group matched 10.3 (3.2) and 10.4 (2.9) tab pairs in the before and after phases, respectively. Corresponding results for GE were 11.1 (2.2) and 14.4 (1.9) and 9.5 (3.6) and 15.0 (1.5) for IE, respectively. In Phase 1 (B), no statistically significant difference was recorded among the groups (P= 0.260). The experimental groups achieved a statistically significant improvement compared with the control group in Phase 3 (A) (P< 0.001). Both experimental groups achieved statistically significant improvement within the group after education, GE (P< 0.001) and IE (P< 0.001). Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that both experimental groups had statistically significant progress in shade matching. The group that received individual education (IE) made statistically significant progress compared with the group that received group education (GE). No statistically significant difference was found in the results of the control group between Phase 1 and Phase 3 of the study.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Improving the shade matching ability facilitates the work of dentists and dental technicians and enhances the esthetics of dental restorations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the influence of group and individual education on shade matching quality using a visual color competency test to match shade tab pairs from two Vita classical A1-D4 shade guides.

Methods: 60 dental students, 21-25 years old (39 females, 21 males) participated in the study. All participants passed a color deficiency test before the experiment. The examination was voluntary and approved by the corresponding Ethics Committee. Students were randomly divided into three groups (n=20): one control group, NE (no education) and two experimental groups - GE (group education) and IE (individual education). The study was performed in three phases. In the "before" (B - Phase 1) and "after" (A - Phase 3) phase, all groups had to match 16 pairs of tabs from two Vita classical A1-D4 shade guides, with the shade designations hidden by custom letter markings. All tabs were mixed on a gray surface illuminated by color-correcting light. In Phase 2 (between B and A), GE had only group education, while IE received additional individual education and training. The control group did not participate in Phase 2. Means and standard deviations were calculated, and differences were compared using the one-way ANOVA, ANCOVA test, and Student t-test for dependent samples (α= 0.05).

Results: The NE group matched 10.3 (3.2) and 10.4 (2.9) tab pairs in the before and after phases, respectively. Corresponding results for GE were 11.1 (2.2) and 14.4 (1.9) and 9.5 (3.6) and 15.0 (1.5) for IE, respectively. In Phase 1 (B), no statistically significant difference was recorded among the groups (P= 0.260). The experimental groups achieved a statistically significant improvement compared with the control group in Phase 3 (A) (P< 0.001). Both experimental groups achieved statistically significant improvement within the group after education, GE (P< 0.001) and IE (P< 0.001). Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that both experimental groups had statistically significant progress in shade matching. The group that received individual education (IE) made statistically significant progress compared with the group that received group education (GE). No statistically significant difference was found in the results of the control group between Phase 1 and Phase 3 of the study.

Clinical significance: Improving the shade matching ability facilitates the work of dentists and dental technicians and enhances the esthetics of dental restorations.

集体和个人教育对牙科学生肤色搭配能力的影响。
目的:通过视觉色彩能力测试,评估团体和个人教育对色调匹配质量的影响。方法:60 名 21-25 岁的牙科学生(39 名女生,21 名男生)参加了研究。所有参与者在实验前都通过了色弱测试。测试是自愿进行的,并获得了相应的伦理委员会的批准。学生被随机分为三组(n=20):一组为对照组 NE(无教育),两组为实验组 GE(集体教育)和 IE(个人教育)。研究分三个阶段进行。在 "实验前"(B - 第 1 阶段)和 "实验后"(A - 第 3 阶段)阶段,所有实验组都必须将两份伟特经典 A1-D4 色调指南中的 16 对标签进行匹配,并用自定义字母标记隐藏色调名称。所有标签都是在色彩校正灯照射下的灰色表面上混合的。在第二阶段(B 和 A 之间),GE 只接受了集体教育,而 IE 则接受了额外的个人教育和培训。对照组没有参加第二阶段。计算平均值和标准差,并使用单因素方差分析、方差分析检验和因果样本的学生 t 检验(α= 0.05)比较差异:NE 组在前后阶段分别匹配了 10.3(3.2)和 10.4(2.9)个标签对。GE 的相应结果分别为 11.1 (2.2) 和 14.4 (1.9),IE 的相应结果分别为 9.5 (3.6) 和 15.0 (1.5)。在第一阶段(B),各组之间没有明显的统计学差异(P= 0.260)。与对照组相比,实验组在第三阶段(A)取得了显著的统计学改善(P< 0.001)。两个实验组在接受教育后,GE(P< 0.001)和 IE(P< 0.001)在组内都取得了统计学意义上的明显改善。在本研究的限制条件下,得出的结论是,两个实验组在阴影匹配方面都取得了统计学意义上的显著进步。与接受集体教育(GE)的实验组相比,接受个人教育(IE)的实验组在统计学上有显著进步。对照组在第一阶段和第三阶段的研究结果在统计学上没有明显差异:临床意义:提高色调匹配能力有助于牙医和牙科技师的工作,并能提高牙科修复体的美观度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信