A descriptive examination of international family/shared meals: Prevalence, meal types, media at meals, and emotional well-being.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Jerica M Berge, William J Doherty, Kristen C Klemenhagen, Derek Hersch, Tai J Mendenhall, Christine Danner
{"title":"A descriptive examination of international family/shared meals: Prevalence, meal types, media at meals, and emotional well-being.","authors":"Jerica M Berge, William J Doherty, Kristen C Klemenhagen, Derek Hersch, Tai J Mendenhall, Christine Danner","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies in the United States have shown associations between family/shared meal frequency and child health and well-being. Less is known about family/shared meal characteristics (e.g., frequency, meal type, meal activities) in adults and international samples and whether there are protective associations between family/shared meal frequency and emotional well-being. Also unknown, is whether family meals provide protective associations for other family members in the household.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In a 2022 cross-sectional study, an online survey was administered in the United States, Italy, and Germany. One adult respondent (49.5% female; Mage = 45.6) from each household (<i>n</i> = 1,983) reported on family/shared meals and well-being. A second family member (e.g., partner, child) responded in a subset of households (<i>n</i> = 1,915). Descriptive statistics by country, Spearman correlations between meal frequency and well-being, and Kruskal-Wallis comparisons of mood indicators across countries were run.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of adults across countries engaged in six or more family/shared meals per week, with more meals on weekends. Breakfast, lunch, and dinner family/shared meals were more common on weekends, and European countries reported engaging in a higher prevalence of all meal types. Higher frequency of family/shared meals was significantly correlated with fewer depressive symptoms, more connectedness, and higher levels of happiness in adults across countries and in a second household member.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Family/shared meals were beneficial across an international sample and may provide protective spillover effects for multiple household members. Clinicians and researchers who work with families may want to consider assessing for and intervening on family meal frequency. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000874","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Studies in the United States have shown associations between family/shared meal frequency and child health and well-being. Less is known about family/shared meal characteristics (e.g., frequency, meal type, meal activities) in adults and international samples and whether there are protective associations between family/shared meal frequency and emotional well-being. Also unknown, is whether family meals provide protective associations for other family members in the household.

Method: In a 2022 cross-sectional study, an online survey was administered in the United States, Italy, and Germany. One adult respondent (49.5% female; Mage = 45.6) from each household (n = 1,983) reported on family/shared meals and well-being. A second family member (e.g., partner, child) responded in a subset of households (n = 1,915). Descriptive statistics by country, Spearman correlations between meal frequency and well-being, and Kruskal-Wallis comparisons of mood indicators across countries were run.

Results: The majority of adults across countries engaged in six or more family/shared meals per week, with more meals on weekends. Breakfast, lunch, and dinner family/shared meals were more common on weekends, and European countries reported engaging in a higher prevalence of all meal types. Higher frequency of family/shared meals was significantly correlated with fewer depressive symptoms, more connectedness, and higher levels of happiness in adults across countries and in a second household member.

Discussion: Family/shared meals were beneficial across an international sample and may provide protective spillover effects for multiple household members. Clinicians and researchers who work with families may want to consider assessing for and intervening on family meal frequency. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

国际家庭/共餐的描述性研究:普遍性、膳食类型、膳食中的媒体和情感幸福。
导言:美国的研究表明,家庭/共餐频率与儿童健康和幸福之间存在关联。关于成人和国际样本中家庭/共享膳食的特征(如频率、膳食类型、膳食活动),以及家庭/共享膳食频率与情绪健康之间是否存在保护性关联,目前还知之甚少。此外,家庭聚餐是否会对家庭中的其他家庭成员产生保护作用也是一个未知数:在一项 2022 年的横断面研究中,在美国、意大利和德国进行了在线调查。每个家庭(n = 1,983)的一名成年受访者(49.5% 为女性;Mage = 45.6)报告了家庭/共享膳食和幸福感的情况。在一部分家庭(n = 1,915)中,第二名家庭成员(如伴侣、子女)进行了回答。对各国的描述性统计、进餐频率与幸福感之间的斯皮尔曼相关性以及各国的情绪指标进行了 Kruskal-Wallis 比较:结果:各国大多数成年人每周进行六次或六次以上的家庭/共同进餐,周末进餐次数更多。早餐、午餐和晚餐的家庭/共享餐在周末更常见,欧洲国家报告的所有类型的用餐率都较高。家庭/共餐的频率越高,抑郁症状越少、联系越紧密、幸福感越高,这与不同国家的成年人和第二个家庭成员有显著相关性:讨论:在国际样本中,家庭/共享膳食是有益的,并可能为多个家庭成员提供保护性溢出效应。从事家庭工作的临床医生和研究人员可能会考虑对家庭聚餐频率进行评估和干预。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Families Systems & Health
Families Systems & Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信