Sibel Altikulaç, Tieme W. P. Janssen, Junlin Yu, Smiddy Nieuwenhuis, Nienke M. Van Atteveldt
{"title":"Mindset profiles of secondary school students: Associations with academic achievement, motivation and school burnout symptoms","authors":"Sibel Altikulaç, Tieme W. P. Janssen, Junlin Yu, Smiddy Nieuwenhuis, Nienke M. Van Atteveldt","doi":"10.1111/bjep.12676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>According to Dweck's mindset theory, implicit beliefs (a.k.a. mindset) have an organizing function, bringing together mindset, achievement goals and effort beliefs in a broader meaning system. Two commonly described meaning systems are a growth-mindset meaning system with mastery goals and positive effort beliefs, and a fixed-mindset meaning system with performance goals and negative effort beliefs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Because of assumed heterogeneity within these two meaning systems, we aim to (1) examine multiple-mindset profiles based on mindset, achievement goals and effort beliefs, by using a data-driven <i>person-oriented approach,</i> and (2) relate these different profiles to several outcome measures (academic achievement, motivation and school burnout symptoms).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Sample</h3>\n \n <p>Self-report questionnaire data were collected from 724 students (11.0–14.7 y.o.; 46.7% girl; 53.3% boy; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 12.8 y.o.).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Latent profile analysis was conducted using mindset, achievement goals and effort beliefs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Four profiles were revealed: one fixed-mindset profile and three growth-mindset profiles, which differed in their performance goal levels (low, moderate and high). Growth-mindset students with low- or moderate-performance goals had more advantageous outcomes, for example, higher math grades and lower school burnout symptoms, compared to growth-mindset students with high-performance goals. Fixed-mindset students had the least advantageous outcomes, for example, lower grades, less intrinsic motivation and more school burnout symptoms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study emphasizes the importance of taking a holistic approach when examining mindset meaning systems, revealing the importance of the level of performance goals and including multiple academic outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51367,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","volume":"94 3","pages":"738-758"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjep.12676","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjep.12676","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
According to Dweck's mindset theory, implicit beliefs (a.k.a. mindset) have an organizing function, bringing together mindset, achievement goals and effort beliefs in a broader meaning system. Two commonly described meaning systems are a growth-mindset meaning system with mastery goals and positive effort beliefs, and a fixed-mindset meaning system with performance goals and negative effort beliefs.
Aims
Because of assumed heterogeneity within these two meaning systems, we aim to (1) examine multiple-mindset profiles based on mindset, achievement goals and effort beliefs, by using a data-driven person-oriented approach, and (2) relate these different profiles to several outcome measures (academic achievement, motivation and school burnout symptoms).
Sample
Self-report questionnaire data were collected from 724 students (11.0–14.7 y.o.; 46.7% girl; 53.3% boy; Mage = 12.8 y.o.).
Methods
Latent profile analysis was conducted using mindset, achievement goals and effort beliefs.
Results
Four profiles were revealed: one fixed-mindset profile and three growth-mindset profiles, which differed in their performance goal levels (low, moderate and high). Growth-mindset students with low- or moderate-performance goals had more advantageous outcomes, for example, higher math grades and lower school burnout symptoms, compared to growth-mindset students with high-performance goals. Fixed-mindset students had the least advantageous outcomes, for example, lower grades, less intrinsic motivation and more school burnout symptoms.
Conclusions
Our study emphasizes the importance of taking a holistic approach when examining mindset meaning systems, revealing the importance of the level of performance goals and including multiple academic outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Educational Psychology publishes original psychological research pertaining to education across all ages and educational levels including: - cognition - learning - motivation - literacy - numeracy and language - behaviour - social-emotional development - developmental difficulties linked to educational psychology or the psychology of education