Psychometrics of the Children's Report of Parental Behavior Inventory among caregivers and youth with HIV.

IF 2.3 2区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Violeta J Rodriguez, Ashley D Kendall, Mardge H Cohen, Sabin Nsanzimana, Charles Ingabire, Eric Remera, Geri Donenberg
{"title":"Psychometrics of the Children's Report of Parental Behavior Inventory among caregivers and youth with HIV.","authors":"Violeta J Rodriguez, Ashley D Kendall, Mardge H Cohen, Sabin Nsanzimana, Charles Ingabire, Eric Remera, Geri Donenberg","doi":"10.1037/fam0001195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parenting has been implicated in a range of youth health outcomes. Positive parenting during adolescence, a critical period of developmental change, may equip youth with the necessary tools for their transition into adulthood and, for youth living with HIV, their transition from pediatric HIV care into adult HIV care. Yet, because few studies have carefully assessed the psychometric properties of parenting instruments applied cross-culturally, the validity of parenting research derived in these contexts remains unclear. This study tested the factor structure of the Children's Report of Parenting Behavior Inventory (CRPBI) in a novel setting (e.g., Rwanda), context (e.g., youth with HIV), and considering multiple informants (caregivers and youth). Youth (<i>N</i> = 330) were on average 16.78 years of age; 51% self-identified as female. Caregivers (<i>N</i> = 330) were on average 44.40 years of age; 80% self-identified as female. The factor structures for youth and caregiver CRPBIs appeared to be indicative of two dimensions: (a) acceptance and positive involvement, and (b) hostile detachment and rejection. The CRPBI worked well for youth reports and showed predictive validity. The CRPBI worked less well for caregivers, necessitating the removal of 10 items, seven of which were related to hostile detachment and rejection. The reliability of both CRPBIs was supported. The CRPBI appears to function well for youth, but not as well for caregivers, in this novel context with this unique population of youth with HIV. The findings support careful assessment of instruments developed in high-resource settings and then used in resource-constrained contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001195","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parenting has been implicated in a range of youth health outcomes. Positive parenting during adolescence, a critical period of developmental change, may equip youth with the necessary tools for their transition into adulthood and, for youth living with HIV, their transition from pediatric HIV care into adult HIV care. Yet, because few studies have carefully assessed the psychometric properties of parenting instruments applied cross-culturally, the validity of parenting research derived in these contexts remains unclear. This study tested the factor structure of the Children's Report of Parenting Behavior Inventory (CRPBI) in a novel setting (e.g., Rwanda), context (e.g., youth with HIV), and considering multiple informants (caregivers and youth). Youth (N = 330) were on average 16.78 years of age; 51% self-identified as female. Caregivers (N = 330) were on average 44.40 years of age; 80% self-identified as female. The factor structures for youth and caregiver CRPBIs appeared to be indicative of two dimensions: (a) acceptance and positive involvement, and (b) hostile detachment and rejection. The CRPBI worked well for youth reports and showed predictive validity. The CRPBI worked less well for caregivers, necessitating the removal of 10 items, seven of which were related to hostile detachment and rejection. The reliability of both CRPBIs was supported. The CRPBI appears to function well for youth, but not as well for caregivers, in this novel context with this unique population of youth with HIV. The findings support careful assessment of instruments developed in high-resource settings and then used in resource-constrained contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

父母行为儿童报告量表在艾滋病毒感染者和青少年中的心理测量。
养育子女与一系列青少年健康结果有关。青春期是发育变化的关键时期,在这一时期积极的养育方式可以为青少年向成年过渡提供必要的工具,对于感染艾滋病病毒的青少年来说,也可以为他们从儿科艾滋病治疗向成人艾滋病治疗过渡提供必要的工具。然而,由于很少有研究对跨文化应用的养育工具的心理测量特性进行仔细评估,因此在这些背景下进行的养育研究的有效性仍不明确。本研究测试了儿童养育行为报告量表(CRPBI)在新环境(如卢旺达)、新背景(如感染 HIV 的青少年)下的因子结构,并考虑了多个信息提供者(照顾者和青少年)。青少年(N = 330)平均年龄为 16.78 岁;51% 自我认同为女性。照顾者(N = 330)平均年龄为 44.40 岁;80% 自我认同为女性。青少年和照顾者 CRPBI 的因子结构似乎表明了两个维度:(a)接受和积极投入,以及(b)敌意疏离和拒绝。CRPBI 在青少年报告中效果良好,并显示出预测有效性。CRPBI 对照顾者的效果较差,需要删除 10 个项目,其中 7 个与敌意疏远和排斥有关。两个 CRPBI 的可靠性都得到了支持。在这种新颖的情况下,对于感染艾滋病病毒的青少年这一特殊群体,CRPBI 似乎对青少年效果良好,但对照顾者效果不佳。研究结果支持对在资源丰富的环境中开发、然后在资源有限的环境中使用的工具进行仔细评估。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
200
期刊介绍: Journal of Family Psychology offers cutting-edge, groundbreaking, state-of-the-art, and innovative empirical research with real-world applicability in the field of family psychology. This premiere family research journal is devoted to the study of the family system, broadly defined, from multiple perspectives and to the application of psychological methods to advance knowledge related to family research, patterns and processes, and assessment and intervention, as well as to policies relevant to advancing the quality of life for families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信