Cancer risk with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept and rituximab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a Danish cohort study.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Rasmus Westermann, René Lindholm Cordtz, Kirsten Duch, Lene Mellemkjaer, Merete Lund Hetland, Bergur Magnussen, Lene Dreyer
{"title":"Cancer risk with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept and rituximab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a Danish cohort study.","authors":"Rasmus Westermann, René Lindholm Cordtz, Kirsten Duch, Lene Mellemkjaer, Merete Lund Hetland, Bergur Magnussen, Lene Dreyer","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keae140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate cancer risk in RA patients treated with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept or rituximab compared with those who received TNF inhibitors (TNFi) and compared with biological DMARDs (bDMARD)-naïve RA patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nationwide registry-based cohort study of RA patients who initiated bDMARD treatment with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, rituximab, and TNFi, as well as bDMARD-naive patients who initiated their second type of conventional synthetic DMARD. Patients were identified in the Danish Rheumatology Quality Register (DANBIO) and followed for cancer from 2006 to 2020. Patients could contribute multiple treatments, with person years, deaths and cancers allocated to each treatment group in a 'latest type of treatment' manner. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and weighted cause-specific Cox models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for cancer in each tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept and rituximab group compared with TNFi-treated and bDMARD-naïve groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 21 982 treatment initiations, 96 475 person years and 1423 cancers were identified. There were no statistically significant increased HRs for overall cancer in tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept or rituximab treatment groups (HRs ranged from 0.7 to 1.1). More than 5 years of abatacept exposure showed a non-significantly increased HR compared with TNFi (HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.74-2.71). For haematological cancers, rituximab treatment showed non-significantly reduced HRs: vs TNFi-treated (HR 0.09; 95% CI 0.00-2.06) and bDMARD-naïve (HR 0.13; 95% CI 0.00-1.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept or rituximab in RA patients was not associated with increased risks of cancer compared with TNFi-treated and with bDMARD-naïve RA patients in a real-world setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"1019-1028"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keae140","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate cancer risk in RA patients treated with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept or rituximab compared with those who received TNF inhibitors (TNFi) and compared with biological DMARDs (bDMARD)-naïve RA patients.

Methods: Nationwide registry-based cohort study of RA patients who initiated bDMARD treatment with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, rituximab, and TNFi, as well as bDMARD-naive patients who initiated their second type of conventional synthetic DMARD. Patients were identified in the Danish Rheumatology Quality Register (DANBIO) and followed for cancer from 2006 to 2020. Patients could contribute multiple treatments, with person years, deaths and cancers allocated to each treatment group in a 'latest type of treatment' manner. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and weighted cause-specific Cox models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for cancer in each tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept and rituximab group compared with TNFi-treated and bDMARD-naïve groups, respectively.

Results: In total, 21 982 treatment initiations, 96 475 person years and 1423 cancers were identified. There were no statistically significant increased HRs for overall cancer in tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept or rituximab treatment groups (HRs ranged from 0.7 to 1.1). More than 5 years of abatacept exposure showed a non-significantly increased HR compared with TNFi (HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.74-2.71). For haematological cancers, rituximab treatment showed non-significantly reduced HRs: vs TNFi-treated (HR 0.09; 95% CI 0.00-2.06) and bDMARD-naïve (HR 0.13; 95% CI 0.00-1.89).

Conclusion: Treatment with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept or rituximab in RA patients was not associated with increased risks of cancer compared with TNFi-treated and with bDMARD-naïve RA patients in a real-world setting.

类风湿性关节炎患者接受托西珠单抗/沙利单抗、阿帕赛普和利妥昔单抗治疗的癌症风险:一项丹麦队列研究。
研究目的研究类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者与接受肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)治疗的患者相比,以及与接受生物疾病修饰抗风湿药(bDMARD)治疗的RA患者相比,接受替西利珠单抗/沙利利单抗、阿巴他赛普或利妥昔单抗治疗的患者患癌症的风险:方法:对开始使用托西珠单抗/沙利单抗、阿帕他赛普、利妥昔单抗、TNFi治疗的RA患者,以及未使用生物修饰抗风湿药(bDMARD)的患者进行全国性登记队列研究。患者在 DANBIO 中被确认,并在 2006-2020 年间接受癌症随访。患者可接受多种治疗,以 "最新治疗类型 "的方式将人年数(PYRS)、死亡人数和癌症病例分配到各治疗组。采用治疗的逆概率加权和加权病因特异性Cox模型,分别计算托西珠单抗/沙利单抗组、阿帕赛普组和利妥昔单抗组与TNFI组和bDMARD幼稚组相比的癌症危险比(HRs):共发现21 982例开始治疗者、96 475例PYRS和1423例癌症患者。在托西珠单抗/沙利单抗、阿帕赛普或利妥昔单抗治疗组中,总体癌症的HRs没有统计学意义上的增加(HRs在0.7-1.1之间)。与TNFi相比,接触阿巴他赛普五年以上的HR增加不显著(HR 1.41,95%置信区间CI 0.74-2.71)。在血液肿瘤方面,利妥昔单抗治疗与TNFi(HR 0.09;95%CI 0.00-2.06)和bDMARD-naïve(HR 0.13;95%CI 0.00-1.89)相比,HRs呈非显著性降低:结论:在真实世界中,与接受过TNFi治疗的RA患者和接受过bDMARD治疗的RA患者相比,接受托西珠单抗/沙利单抗、阿巴他赛普或利妥昔单抗治疗的RA患者罹患癌症的风险并不增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rheumatology
Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1091
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Rheumatology strives to support research and discovery by publishing the highest quality original scientific papers with a focus on basic, clinical and translational research. The journal’s subject areas cover a wide range of paediatric and adult rheumatological conditions from an international perspective. It is an official journal of the British Society for Rheumatology, published by Oxford University Press. Rheumatology publishes original articles, reviews, editorials, guidelines, concise reports, meta-analyses, original case reports, clinical vignettes, letters and matters arising from published material. The journal takes pride in serving the global rheumatology community, with a focus on high societal impact in the form of podcasts, videos and extended social media presence, and utilizing metrics such as Altmetric. Keep up to date by following the journal on Twitter @RheumJnl.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信