A mixed-method study evaluating an innovative care model for rural patients undergoing outpatient breast surgery.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Canadian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-03-07 Print Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1503/cjs.004923
Sharon Chiu, Samantha Fowler, Sarah Bridges, Natasha Hanson, Jordan King, Sarah Street, Heather Tait, Karen Irving, Peggy McLean, Lauren McLaughlin, Adrienne Gulliver
{"title":"A mixed-method study evaluating an innovative care model for rural patients undergoing outpatient breast surgery.","authors":"Sharon Chiu, Samantha Fowler, Sarah Bridges, Natasha Hanson, Jordan King, Sarah Street, Heather Tait, Karen Irving, Peggy McLean, Lauren McLaughlin, Adrienne Gulliver","doi":"10.1503/cjs.004923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Delta Oasis program was launched in New Brunswick in 2006 to offer patients from rural areas who were undergoing breast cancer surgery and their families 1 night of free accommodations and a postoperative consultation with an extramural nurse. We sought to investigate patient experiences with this program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-method retrospective study took place from 2020 to 2022 and compared the preoperative anxiety and quality of recovery of program participants and control patients who were discharged home over 100 km from hospital. We conducted 2 × 2 analysis of variance to evaluate the effects of intervention group and surgery type. We conducted semistructured interviews with intervention participants, which we then thematically analyzed. Two patient partners were engaged during data synthesis to support the interpretation of results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 34 patients who participated in the program and 18 control patients. No statistically significant differences were found between treatment groups in preoperative anxiety and quality of recovery, regardless of surgery type. Thematic analysis of interviews with 17 intervention participants revealed that they were highly satisfied with the program and that the experience helped reduce stress and discomfort related to their surgery.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The Delta Oasis program is a cost-effective alternative to inpatient care after breast cancer surgery and is highly regarded by rural patients; expansion to other regions with the inclusion of additional low-risk surgeries could help address hospital capacity issues. This study contributes to our understanding of the patient experience with the Delta Oasis program and informs the development of similar programs elsewhere.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"67 2","pages":"E77-E84"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10927285/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.004923","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Delta Oasis program was launched in New Brunswick in 2006 to offer patients from rural areas who were undergoing breast cancer surgery and their families 1 night of free accommodations and a postoperative consultation with an extramural nurse. We sought to investigate patient experiences with this program.

Methods: This mixed-method retrospective study took place from 2020 to 2022 and compared the preoperative anxiety and quality of recovery of program participants and control patients who were discharged home over 100 km from hospital. We conducted 2 × 2 analysis of variance to evaluate the effects of intervention group and surgery type. We conducted semistructured interviews with intervention participants, which we then thematically analyzed. Two patient partners were engaged during data synthesis to support the interpretation of results.

Results: We included 34 patients who participated in the program and 18 control patients. No statistically significant differences were found between treatment groups in preoperative anxiety and quality of recovery, regardless of surgery type. Thematic analysis of interviews with 17 intervention participants revealed that they were highly satisfied with the program and that the experience helped reduce stress and discomfort related to their surgery.

Interpretation: The Delta Oasis program is a cost-effective alternative to inpatient care after breast cancer surgery and is highly regarded by rural patients; expansion to other regions with the inclusion of additional low-risk surgeries could help address hospital capacity issues. This study contributes to our understanding of the patient experience with the Delta Oasis program and informs the development of similar programs elsewhere.

一项混合方法研究,评估针对接受门诊乳腺手术的农村患者的创新护理模式。
背景介绍三角洲绿洲计划于2006年在新不伦瑞克省启动,旨在为农村地区接受乳腺癌手术的患者及其家属提供一晚免费住宿,并由一名校外护士提供术后咨询。我们试图调查患者对该计划的体验:这项混合方法的回顾性研究于 2020 年至 2022 年进行,比较了该计划参与者和对照组患者的术前焦虑和康复质量,这些患者出院回家时距离医院超过 100 公里。我们进行了 2 × 2 方差分析,以评估干预组和手术类型的影响。我们对干预参与者进行了半结构化访谈,然后进行了专题分析。在数据综合过程中,我们邀请了两位患者伙伴参与,以支持对结果的解释:我们纳入了 34 名参与计划的患者和 18 名对照组患者。无论手术类型如何,治疗组之间在术前焦虑和恢复质量方面均无统计学差异。对 17 名干预参与者的访谈进行的主题分析表明,他们对该项目非常满意,认为该体验有助于减轻与手术相关的压力和不适:德尔塔绿洲 "计划是乳腺癌术后住院治疗的一种经济有效的替代方案,受到了农村患者的高度评价;将该计划推广到其他地区并纳入更多的低风险手术,有助于解决医院的收治能力问题。这项研究有助于我们了解患者对德尔塔绿洲计划的体验,并为其他地区类似计划的发展提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of CJS is to contribute to the meaningful continuing medical education of Canadian surgical specialists, and to provide surgeons with an effective vehicle for the dissemination of observations in the areas of clinical and basic science research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信