Islamic, ethical and conventional mutual funds: a comparative study (1990–2022)

IF 2.5 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Said Elfakhani
{"title":"Islamic, ethical and conventional mutual funds: a comparative study (1990–2022)","authors":"Said Elfakhani","doi":"10.1108/jiabr-03-2023-0105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to test mutual fund superiority, comparing the performance of 646 Islamic mutual funds with 475 ethical funds and conventional proxies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study uses statistical methods including paired <em>t</em>-statistics of independent samples, one-way Bonferroni test–analysis of variance–<em>F</em>-statistic for testing means equality, the chi-squared test for median equality and regression models corrected for heteroscedasticity. These methods are used to identify superiority of mutual funds and to validate the significance of the results.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings confirm the superiority of conventional funds over ethical funds and ethical funds over Islamic funds. Both ethical and Islamic funds, however, outperform conventional proxies during some recessionary periods. Moreover, stronger performance is recorded for Islamic funds in Europe and North America regions and across age and asset allocation categories, but limited support for reversal fund size, composition focus and reversed price effect.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>These findings should assist investors when deciding to invest and motivate Islamic and ethical funds to improve their portfolio formation and asset allocation strategies set by their professional managers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The originality of this study is in its comprehensive approach in that it compares the performance of funds after accounting for such characteristics as fund objectives, size, age, asset allocation, geographical investment focus, fund composition focus, share price levels and the effect of global crises. This study approach is not only original and productive in documenting Islamic funds’ performance for the past three decades (1990–2022) but can also update the literature on these characteristics collectively and individually.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46046,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jiabr-03-2023-0105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to test mutual fund superiority, comparing the performance of 646 Islamic mutual funds with 475 ethical funds and conventional proxies.

Design/methodology/approach

This study uses statistical methods including paired t-statistics of independent samples, one-way Bonferroni test–analysis of variance–F-statistic for testing means equality, the chi-squared test for median equality and regression models corrected for heteroscedasticity. These methods are used to identify superiority of mutual funds and to validate the significance of the results.

Findings

The findings confirm the superiority of conventional funds over ethical funds and ethical funds over Islamic funds. Both ethical and Islamic funds, however, outperform conventional proxies during some recessionary periods. Moreover, stronger performance is recorded for Islamic funds in Europe and North America regions and across age and asset allocation categories, but limited support for reversal fund size, composition focus and reversed price effect.

Research limitations/implications

These findings should assist investors when deciding to invest and motivate Islamic and ethical funds to improve their portfolio formation and asset allocation strategies set by their professional managers.

Originality/value

The originality of this study is in its comprehensive approach in that it compares the performance of funds after accounting for such characteristics as fund objectives, size, age, asset allocation, geographical investment focus, fund composition focus, share price levels and the effect of global crises. This study approach is not only original and productive in documenting Islamic funds’ performance for the past three decades (1990–2022) but can also update the literature on these characteristics collectively and individually.

伊斯兰、道德和传统共同基金:比较研究(1990-2022 年)
目的本研究旨在检验共同基金的优越性,比较 646 种伊斯兰共同基金与 475 种道德基金和传统代用基金的表现。设计/方法/途径本研究采用的统计方法包括独立样本的配对 t 统计量、用于检验均值相等的单向 Bonferroni 检验-方差分析-F 统计量、用于检验中位数相等的卡方检验以及修正了异方差的回归模型。研究结果证实,传统基金优于道德基金,道德基金优于伊斯兰基金。然而,在某些衰退时期,道德基金和伊斯兰基金的表现都优于传统基金。此外,伊斯兰基金在欧洲和北美地区以及不同年龄和资产配置类别中的表现更强,但对反转基金规模、组成重点和反转价格效应的支持有限。研究局限/影响这些发现应有助于投资者决定投资,并促使伊斯兰基金和道德基金改进其投资组合的形成及其专业经理制定的资产配置策略。独创性/价值本研究的独创性在于其全面的研究方法,即在考虑了基金目标、规模、年龄、资产分配、地域投资重点、基金组成重点、股价水平和全球危机影响等特征后,对基金的表现进行比较。这种研究方法不仅在记录伊斯兰基金过去三十年(1990-2022 年)的业绩方面具有独创性和富有成效,而且还可以更新关于这些特征的集体和单独文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
22.70%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: The journal provides a dynamic forum for the advancement of accounting and business knowledge based on Shari’ah and Islamic activities that have an impact on the welfare of society. JIABR publishes articles on the interplay between Islamic business ethics, accounting, auditing and governance, in promoting accountability, socio-economic justice (adl) and everlasting success (al-falah). It seeks to inform, among others, current theoretical and empirical research and practice in Islamic accounting, auditing and corporate governance, management of Islamic organizations, accounting regulation and policy for Islamic institutions, Shari’ah auditing and corporate governance, financial and non-financial performance measurement and disclosure in Islamic institutions and organizations. All styles of research, theoretical and empirical, case studies, practice-based papers and research notes that are well written and falling within the journal''s scope, are generally welcomed by the journal. Scope/Coverage Development of accounting, auditing and corporate governance concepts based on Shari’ah Socio-political influence on accounting and auditing regulation and policy making for Islamic financial institutions and organizations Historical perspectives on Islamic accounting, auditing and financial management Critical analysis on issues and challenges on accounting disclosure and measurement, Shari’ah audit and corporate governance Controls and risks in Islamic organizations Financial and non-financial performance measurement and disclosure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信