Moving across disorders: A cross-sectional study of cognition in early onset ataxia and dystonia

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Maraike A. Coenen , Deborah Sival , Rick Brandsma , Hendriekje Eggink , Marieke E. Timmerman , Marina A. Tijssen , Jacoba M. Spikman
{"title":"Moving across disorders: A cross-sectional study of cognition in early onset ataxia and dystonia","authors":"Maraike A. Coenen ,&nbsp;Deborah Sival ,&nbsp;Rick Brandsma ,&nbsp;Hendriekje Eggink ,&nbsp;Marieke E. Timmerman ,&nbsp;Marina A. Tijssen ,&nbsp;Jacoba M. Spikman","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpn.2024.02.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Early onset ataxia (EOA) and Early Onset Dystonia (EOD) are movement disorders developing in young people (age &lt;25 per definition). These disorders result from dysfunctional networks involving the cerebellum and basal ganglia. As these structures are also important for cognition, cognitive deficits can be expected in EOA and EOD. EOA and EOD sometimes co-occur, but in those cases the predominant phenotype is determining. A pending question is whether predominantly EOA and EOD have different profiles of cognitive impairment.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We investigated whether cognitive functions were impaired in patients with either predominant EOA or predominant EOD and whether cognitive profiles differed between both patient groups.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The sample consisted of 26 EOA and 26 EOD patients with varying etiology but similar duration and severity of the disorder. Patient samples were compared to a group of 26 healthy controls, all matched on age and gender. All participants underwent neuropsychological testing for verbal intelligence, memory, working memory, attention/cognitive speed, executive functions, emotion recognition and language.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>EOA and EOD patients both performed significantly worse than healthy controls on tests of verbal intelligence, working memory and executive functions. Additionally, attention/cognitive speed and emotion recognition were impaired in the EOA group. Compared to EOD, EOA patients performed worse on attention/cognitive speed and verbal intelligence.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our results show overall similar profiles of cognitive deficits in both patient groups, but deficits were more pronounced in the patients with EOA. This suggests that more severe cognitive impairment is related to more severe cerebellar network dysfunction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50481,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Paediatric Neurology","volume":"49 ","pages":"Pages 100-105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090379824000230/pdfft?md5=ec0c11b5b96e2bdbdfcfaa2c6008ebf3&pid=1-s2.0-S1090379824000230-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Paediatric Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090379824000230","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Early onset ataxia (EOA) and Early Onset Dystonia (EOD) are movement disorders developing in young people (age <25 per definition). These disorders result from dysfunctional networks involving the cerebellum and basal ganglia. As these structures are also important for cognition, cognitive deficits can be expected in EOA and EOD. EOA and EOD sometimes co-occur, but in those cases the predominant phenotype is determining. A pending question is whether predominantly EOA and EOD have different profiles of cognitive impairment.

Objectives

We investigated whether cognitive functions were impaired in patients with either predominant EOA or predominant EOD and whether cognitive profiles differed between both patient groups.

Methods

The sample consisted of 26 EOA and 26 EOD patients with varying etiology but similar duration and severity of the disorder. Patient samples were compared to a group of 26 healthy controls, all matched on age and gender. All participants underwent neuropsychological testing for verbal intelligence, memory, working memory, attention/cognitive speed, executive functions, emotion recognition and language.

Results

EOA and EOD patients both performed significantly worse than healthy controls on tests of verbal intelligence, working memory and executive functions. Additionally, attention/cognitive speed and emotion recognition were impaired in the EOA group. Compared to EOD, EOA patients performed worse on attention/cognitive speed and verbal intelligence.

Conclusions

Our results show overall similar profiles of cognitive deficits in both patient groups, but deficits were more pronounced in the patients with EOA. This suggests that more severe cognitive impairment is related to more severe cerebellar network dysfunction.

跨越障碍:对早发性共济失调和肌张力障碍患者认知能力的横断面研究
早发性共济失调(EOA)和早发性肌张力障碍(EOD)是发生在年轻人身上的运动障碍(根据定义,年龄小于 25 岁)。这些疾病是小脑和基底神经节网络功能失调所致。由于这些结构对认知也很重要,因此,EOA 和 EOD 可能会出现认知障碍。EOA和EOD有时会同时出现,但在这些病例中,主要表型是确定的。一个悬而未决的问题是,EOA 和 EOD 是否具有不同的认知功能障碍特征。我们研究了EOA为主型和EOD为主型患者的认知功能是否受损,以及两组患者的认知特征是否存在差异。样本包括 26 名 EOA 和 26 名 EOD 患者,他们的病因各不相同,但病程和严重程度相似。患者样本与一组 26 名健康对照者进行了比较,所有对照者的年龄和性别均匹配。所有参与者都接受了神经心理学测试,包括言语智力、记忆力、工作记忆、注意力/认知速度、执行功能、情绪识别和语言。在语言智能、工作记忆和执行功能测试中,EOA 和 EOD 患者的表现均明显低于健康对照组。此外,注意力/认知速度和情绪识别能力也在EOA组中受损。与 EOD 相比,EOA 患者在注意力/认知速度和言语智能方面的表现更差。我们的研究结果表明,两组患者的认知缺陷情况总体相似,但 EOA 患者的缺陷更为明显。这表明,更严重的认知障碍与更严重的小脑网络功能障碍有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
115
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Paediatric Neurology is the Official Journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society, successor to the long-established European Federation of Child Neurology Societies. Under the guidance of a prestigious International editorial board, this multi-disciplinary journal publishes exciting clinical and experimental research in this rapidly expanding field. High quality papers written by leading experts encompass all the major diseases including epilepsy, movement disorders, neuromuscular disorders, neurodegenerative disorders and intellectual disability. Other exciting highlights include articles on brain imaging and neonatal neurology, and the publication of regularly updated tables relating to the main groups of disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信