Uterine fibroids and risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; results from a racially diverse high-risk cohort

Katherine Cameron, Mostafa Borahay, Xiumei Hong, Valerie Baker, Arthur Vaught, Xiaobin Wang
{"title":"Uterine fibroids and risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; results from a racially diverse high-risk cohort","authors":"Katherine Cameron, Mostafa Borahay, Xiumei Hong, Valerie Baker, Arthur Vaught, Xiaobin Wang","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.05.24303830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study Question: What is the impact of the presence of uterine fibroids on the risk of developing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) in a predominantly urban, low-income, Black, and Hispanic population of women with ultrasound or clinically diagnosed uterine fibroids with rich phenotypic data to carefully control for potential confounders?\nSummary answers: The odds of HDP were 39% higher in women with uterine fibroids compared to those without when controlled for age at delivery, race, prepregnancy BMI, education, parity, and smoking status; neither fibroid location or size modified this risk.\nWhat is known already: Studies are conflicting regarding the impact of uterine fibroids on risk of HDP; limitations of prior studies include primarily Western European populations and lack of measurement of potential confounders. Study design, size, and duration: A total of 7030 women from the Boston Birth Cohort (a racially diverse cohort recruited from 1998 to 2018) that had clinical and ultrasound data regarding uterine fibroid status were included in this analysis. Participants/materials, setting, and methods: Four hundred eighty-nine women with uterine fibroids and 6541 women without were included. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were ascertained from medical records. Logistic regression was performed to assess the risk of HDP in women with and without uterine fibroids. Covariates adjusted for included age at delivery, race, pre-pregnancy BMI, education, parity, and smoking status during pregnancy. Sub-analyses were performed to assess the impact of specific fibroid location and overall fibroid volume burden.\nMain results and the role of chance: The incidence of uterine fibroids in the cohort was 7% (N=489). Twelve percent of women without uterine fibroids and 17% of women with fibroids developed HDP; in multivariate analyses adjusted for the potential confounders above, the odds of HDP were 39% higher in women with uterine fibroids compared to those without (p=0.03). Women with a uterine fibroid diagnosis based on ICD code (n=297) versus asymptomatic incidental ultrasound diagnosis (n=192) had a significantly greater chance of developing HDP (20 vs 15%, p=0.006). There did not appear to be an association between number of fibroids or total fibroid volume and the risk of developing HDP. Limitations, reasons for caution: This study has a relatively small sample size. While post-hoc power calculation determined that there was adequate power to detect a 4.6% difference in the incidence of development of HDP between participants with uterine fibroids and those without, the sub-analyses based on fibroid size, location, and method of diagnosis were underpowered to determine a similar level of difference.\nWider implications of the findings: In a racially diverse cohort, presence of uterine fibroids was a significant risk factor for developing HDP, regardless of uterine fibroid size or location. This may have implications for additional monitoring and risk stratification in women with uterine fibroids.\nStudy funding/competing interests: KC supported by WRHR NIH NICHD Award # K12 HD103036, PI Andrew Satin, RD James Segars. The Boston Birth Cohort (the parent study) was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants (2R01HD041702, R01HD098232, R01ES031272, R01ES031521, and U01 ES034983); and the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) (UT7MC45949). This information or content and conclusions are those of the authors and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by any funding agencies. Trial registration number: The BBC is registered under clinicaltrials.gov NCT03228875.","PeriodicalId":501409,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.05.24303830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study Question: What is the impact of the presence of uterine fibroids on the risk of developing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) in a predominantly urban, low-income, Black, and Hispanic population of women with ultrasound or clinically diagnosed uterine fibroids with rich phenotypic data to carefully control for potential confounders? Summary answers: The odds of HDP were 39% higher in women with uterine fibroids compared to those without when controlled for age at delivery, race, prepregnancy BMI, education, parity, and smoking status; neither fibroid location or size modified this risk. What is known already: Studies are conflicting regarding the impact of uterine fibroids on risk of HDP; limitations of prior studies include primarily Western European populations and lack of measurement of potential confounders. Study design, size, and duration: A total of 7030 women from the Boston Birth Cohort (a racially diverse cohort recruited from 1998 to 2018) that had clinical and ultrasound data regarding uterine fibroid status were included in this analysis. Participants/materials, setting, and methods: Four hundred eighty-nine women with uterine fibroids and 6541 women without were included. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were ascertained from medical records. Logistic regression was performed to assess the risk of HDP in women with and without uterine fibroids. Covariates adjusted for included age at delivery, race, pre-pregnancy BMI, education, parity, and smoking status during pregnancy. Sub-analyses were performed to assess the impact of specific fibroid location and overall fibroid volume burden. Main results and the role of chance: The incidence of uterine fibroids in the cohort was 7% (N=489). Twelve percent of women without uterine fibroids and 17% of women with fibroids developed HDP; in multivariate analyses adjusted for the potential confounders above, the odds of HDP were 39% higher in women with uterine fibroids compared to those without (p=0.03). Women with a uterine fibroid diagnosis based on ICD code (n=297) versus asymptomatic incidental ultrasound diagnosis (n=192) had a significantly greater chance of developing HDP (20 vs 15%, p=0.006). There did not appear to be an association between number of fibroids or total fibroid volume and the risk of developing HDP. Limitations, reasons for caution: This study has a relatively small sample size. While post-hoc power calculation determined that there was adequate power to detect a 4.6% difference in the incidence of development of HDP between participants with uterine fibroids and those without, the sub-analyses based on fibroid size, location, and method of diagnosis were underpowered to determine a similar level of difference. Wider implications of the findings: In a racially diverse cohort, presence of uterine fibroids was a significant risk factor for developing HDP, regardless of uterine fibroid size or location. This may have implications for additional monitoring and risk stratification in women with uterine fibroids. Study funding/competing interests: KC supported by WRHR NIH NICHD Award # K12 HD103036, PI Andrew Satin, RD James Segars. The Boston Birth Cohort (the parent study) was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants (2R01HD041702, R01HD098232, R01ES031272, R01ES031521, and U01 ES034983); and the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) (UT7MC45949). This information or content and conclusions are those of the authors and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by any funding agencies. Trial registration number: The BBC is registered under clinicaltrials.gov NCT03228875.
子宫肌瘤与妊娠高血压疾病的风险;来自不同种族高风险人群的结果
研究问题:在一个以城市、低收入、黑人和西班牙裔为主的人群中,超声或临床诊断出子宫肌瘤的妇女具有丰富的表型数据,可以仔细控制潜在的混杂因素,那么子宫肌瘤的存在对妊娠高血压疾病(HDP)的发病风险有何影响?在控制了分娩年龄、种族、孕前体重指数、教育程度、胎次和吸烟状况后,与无子宫肌瘤的妇女相比,有子宫肌瘤的妇女发生 HDP 的几率要高出 39%;肌瘤的位置或大小都不会改变这种风险:关于子宫肌瘤对 HDP 风险的影响,研究结果相互矛盾;以往研究的局限性包括研究对象主要是西欧人,以及缺乏对潜在混杂因素的测量。研究设计、规模和持续时间:共有 7030 名来自波士顿出生队列(1998 年至 2018 年期间招募的种族多元化队列)、拥有子宫肌瘤状态相关临床和超声波数据的女性被纳入本次分析。参与者/材料、环境和方法:纳入了 489 名患有子宫肌瘤的女性和 6541 名未患有子宫肌瘤的女性。从医疗记录中确定了妊娠高血压疾病。通过逻辑回归评估了患有和未患有子宫肌瘤的妇女罹患 HDP 的风险。调整的协变量包括分娩年龄、种族、孕前体重指数、教育程度、胎次和孕期吸烟状况。还进行了子分析,以评估特定肌瘤位置和总体肌瘤体积负担的影响:队列中子宫肌瘤的发病率为 7%(N=489)。12%的无子宫肌瘤妇女和17%的有子宫肌瘤妇女发生了HDP;在对上述潜在混杂因素进行调整的多变量分析中,与无子宫肌瘤的妇女相比,有子宫肌瘤的妇女发生HDP的几率要高出39%(P=0.03)。根据 ICD 编码诊断出子宫肌瘤的妇女(人数=297)与无症状偶然超声诊断出子宫肌瘤的妇女(人数=192)相比,患 HDP 的几率明显更高(20 比 15%,P=0.006)。子宫肌瘤数目或肌瘤总体积与罹患HDP的风险之间似乎没有关联。局限性,需谨慎的原因:本研究的样本量相对较小。虽然事后功率计算确定有足够的功率来检测有子宫肌瘤和没有子宫肌瘤的参与者之间4.6%的HDP发病率差异,但基于肌瘤大小、位置和诊断方法的子分析功率不足,无法确定类似程度的差异:研究结果的广泛意义:在一个种族多元化的队列中,无论子宫肌瘤的大小或位置如何,子宫肌瘤的存在都是罹患HDP的一个重要风险因素。这可能会对患有子宫肌瘤的妇女进行额外监测和风险分层产生影响:KC由WRHR NIH NICHD Award # K12 HD103036支持,PI为Andrew Satin,RD为James Segars。波士顿出生队列(母研究)部分由美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助(2R01HD041702、R01HD098232、R01ES031272、R01ES031521 和 U01 ES034983);以及美国卫生与公众服务部(HHS)卫生资源与服务管理局(HRSA)资助(UT7MC45949)。这些信息或内容及结论仅代表作者个人观点,不应被视为任何资助机构的官方立场或政策,也不应被推断为任何资助机构的认可。试验注册号:BBC 已在 clinicaltrials.gov NCT03228875 注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信