A Pilot Study to Explore the Effect of Long Acting Injectable Antipsychotics on Aggression.

Psychopharmacology bulletin Pub Date : 2024-03-04
Tiffany M Hopkins, O Greg Deardorff, Yifei Liu, Megan G Trout, Roger W Sommi, Niels C Beck
{"title":"A Pilot Study to Explore the Effect of Long Acting Injectable Antipsychotics on Aggression.","authors":"Tiffany M Hopkins, O Greg Deardorff, Yifei Liu, Megan G Trout, Roger W Sommi, Niels C Beck","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the effect of switching from an oral antipsychotic to a long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic on aggression, in terms of the changes of verbal and physical aggression, interventions required, self-injurious behavior, use of seclusion or restraint, antipsychotic medication refusal, and use of antipsychotics as needed (PRN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective chart review at a long-term state forensic psychiatric facility. Patients treated with an oral antipsychotic for at least 6 months and then switched to a LAI antipsychotic for an additional 6 months during an 80-month period were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 70 patients evaluated, 18 were the study subjects. The median age of the cohort was 38 years with a majority being male. Of the seven patients who had an incident of aggression, two had an increase in aggressive incidents following the switch, three had a decrease, and two had no change. Thirty-six interventions occurred while patients were on an oral antipsychotic, which decreased by 30.6% to 25 interventions after the switch. Three patients had an incident of self-injurious behavior, and 6 patients required restraints/seclusions. Of the eight patients who had retrievable medication refusal and antipsychotic PRN use information, five had a decrease in antipsychotic medication refusals and five had an increase in PRN antipsychotic use after the switch.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The switch from an oral antipsychotic to a LAI antipsychotic did not appear to significantly increase or decrease incidents of aggression or self-injurious behavior, but seemed to decrease the number of restraints/seclusions required.</p>","PeriodicalId":94351,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"54 1","pages":"18-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10913868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the effect of switching from an oral antipsychotic to a long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic on aggression, in terms of the changes of verbal and physical aggression, interventions required, self-injurious behavior, use of seclusion or restraint, antipsychotic medication refusal, and use of antipsychotics as needed (PRN).

Methods: This was a retrospective chart review at a long-term state forensic psychiatric facility. Patients treated with an oral antipsychotic for at least 6 months and then switched to a LAI antipsychotic for an additional 6 months during an 80-month period were included.

Results: Out of 70 patients evaluated, 18 were the study subjects. The median age of the cohort was 38 years with a majority being male. Of the seven patients who had an incident of aggression, two had an increase in aggressive incidents following the switch, three had a decrease, and two had no change. Thirty-six interventions occurred while patients were on an oral antipsychotic, which decreased by 30.6% to 25 interventions after the switch. Three patients had an incident of self-injurious behavior, and 6 patients required restraints/seclusions. Of the eight patients who had retrievable medication refusal and antipsychotic PRN use information, five had a decrease in antipsychotic medication refusals and five had an increase in PRN antipsychotic use after the switch.

Conclusion: The switch from an oral antipsychotic to a LAI antipsychotic did not appear to significantly increase or decrease incidents of aggression or self-injurious behavior, but seemed to decrease the number of restraints/seclusions required.

探索长效注射抗精神病药物对攻击行为影响的试点研究。
目的探讨从口服抗精神病药物转为长效注射(LAI)抗精神病药物对攻击行为的影响,包括言语和肢体攻击行为的变化、所需的干预措施、自伤行为、隔离或约束的使用、抗精神病药物的拒绝以及根据需要使用抗精神病药物(PRN):这是一项在州立长期法医精神病院进行的回顾性病历审查。在80个月的时间里,患者接受了至少6个月的口服抗精神病药物治疗,然后又改用LAI抗精神病药物治疗了6个月:在接受评估的 70 名患者中,18 人是研究对象。研究对象的年龄中位数为 38 岁,男性占大多数。在发生过攻击事件的 7 名患者中,有 2 人在更换治疗方案后攻击事件有所增加,3 人有所减少,2 人没有变化。患者在使用口服抗精神病药物时,有 36 次干预,而在更换药物后,干预次数减少了 30.6%,为 25 次。三名患者发生了自伤行为,六名患者需要限制/隔离。在可检索到拒用药物和抗精神病药物PRN使用信息的8名患者中,有5名患者在换药后拒用抗精神病药物的情况有所减少,有5名患者在换药后增加了抗精神病药物PRN的使用:从口服抗精神病药物转为 LAI 抗精神病药物似乎并没有显著增加或减少攻击或自伤行为,但似乎减少了所需的限制/隔离次数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信