[Accuracy Verification for Slice Sensitivity Profile Measurement Method by Averaging the Multiple Tilted Wires in Computed Tomography Image].

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi Pub Date : 2024-04-20 Epub Date: 2024-03-07 DOI:10.6009/jjrt.2024-1427
Takeshi Fukaya, Katsuhiko Murakami, Masaki Saito, Toshihiko Katakura
{"title":"[Accuracy Verification for Slice Sensitivity Profile Measurement Method by Averaging the Multiple Tilted Wires in Computed Tomography Image].","authors":"Takeshi Fukaya, Katsuhiko Murakami, Masaki Saito, Toshihiko Katakura","doi":"10.6009/jjrt.2024-1427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Several studies present the unsuitability of the tilted-wire method for slice sensitivity profile (SSP) in helical scan. We compared the accuracy for SSP by the tilted-wire averaging method using multiple wire profiles and by the conventional micro-coin method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A micro-coin phantom positioned at the center or the off-center was scanned using a 64-detector row CT scanner in different positions where an X-ray tube starts scanning. In the same way, tilted-wire averaging phantoms, approximately 70 mm in diameter, in the shape of a donut, 8 wires tilted from the circumference toward the center, were scanned. Images were reconstructed with a slice thickness of 0.5 mm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relative errors of full width at half maximum (FWHM) by the tilted-wire averaging method were -0.015 mm to -0.004 mm (-1.98% to -0.56%) at the center compared to those by the micro-coin method, and it is almost the same value regardless of the number of wires. Relative errors were 0.001 mm to 0.029 mm (0.11% to 3.74%) at the upper 8 cm from the center, and 0.014 mm to 0.078 mm (1.86% to 10.25%) at the upper 16 cm, and the value of relative errors increased as it got farther from the center and as the number of wires went fewer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicated that accurate measurement of SSP may be achieved by using 4 (arranged every 90 degrees) or more averaging wires.</p>","PeriodicalId":74309,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","volume":" ","pages":"390-402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2024-1427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Several studies present the unsuitability of the tilted-wire method for slice sensitivity profile (SSP) in helical scan. We compared the accuracy for SSP by the tilted-wire averaging method using multiple wire profiles and by the conventional micro-coin method.

Methods: A micro-coin phantom positioned at the center or the off-center was scanned using a 64-detector row CT scanner in different positions where an X-ray tube starts scanning. In the same way, tilted-wire averaging phantoms, approximately 70 mm in diameter, in the shape of a donut, 8 wires tilted from the circumference toward the center, were scanned. Images were reconstructed with a slice thickness of 0.5 mm.

Results: The relative errors of full width at half maximum (FWHM) by the tilted-wire averaging method were -0.015 mm to -0.004 mm (-1.98% to -0.56%) at the center compared to those by the micro-coin method, and it is almost the same value regardless of the number of wires. Relative errors were 0.001 mm to 0.029 mm (0.11% to 3.74%) at the upper 8 cm from the center, and 0.014 mm to 0.078 mm (1.86% to 10.25%) at the upper 16 cm, and the value of relative errors increased as it got farther from the center and as the number of wires went fewer.

Conclusion: This study indicated that accurate measurement of SSP may be achieved by using 4 (arranged every 90 degrees) or more averaging wires.

[通过平均计算机断层扫描图像中的多条倾斜导线,验证切片灵敏度轮廓测量方法的准确性]。
目的:多项研究表明,倾斜导线法不适合螺旋扫描中的切片灵敏度曲线(SSP)。我们比较了使用多导线剖面的倾斜导线平均法和传统的微硬币法的 SSP 精确度:在 X 射线管开始扫描的不同位置,使用 64 个探测器的行式 CT 扫描仪对位于中心或偏离中心的微型硬币模型进行扫描。以同样的方式,扫描了直径约 70 毫米、呈甜甜圈形状、8 根导线从圆周向中心倾斜的倾斜导线平均模型。以 0.5 毫米的切片厚度重建图像:倾斜导线平均法与微硬币法相比,中心点的半最大全宽(FWHM)相对误差为-0.015 毫米至-0.004 毫米(-1.98% 至-0.56%),且无论导线数量多少,误差值几乎相同。相对误差在距离中心上方 8 厘米处为 0.001 毫米至 0.029 毫米(0.11% 至 3.74%),在上方 16 厘米处为 0.014 毫米至 0.078 毫米(1.86% 至 10.25%),并且随着距离中心越远、导线数量越少,相对误差值越大:这项研究表明,使用 4 根(每隔 90 度排列)或更多的平均导线可实现对 SSP 的精确测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信