Effects of motor imagery-based neurofeedback training after bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on post-stroke upper limb motor function: an exploratory crossover clinical trial.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Francisco José Sánchez Cuesta, Yeray González-Zamorano, Marcos Moreno-Verdú, Athanasios Vourvopoulos, Ignacio J Serrano, Maria Dolores Del Castillo-Sobrino, Patrícia Figueiredo, Juan Pablo Romero
{"title":"Effects of motor imagery-based neurofeedback training after bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on post-stroke upper limb motor function: an exploratory crossover clinical trial.","authors":"Francisco José Sánchez Cuesta, Yeray González-Zamorano, Marcos Moreno-Verdú, Athanasios Vourvopoulos, Ignacio J Serrano, Maria Dolores Del Castillo-Sobrino, Patrícia Figueiredo, Juan Pablo Romero","doi":"10.2340/jrm.v56.18253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the clinical effects of combining motor imagery-based neurofeedback training with bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for upper limb motor function in subacute and chronic stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Clinical trial following an AB/BA crossover design with counterbalanced assignment.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Twenty individuals with subacute (n = 4) or chronic stroke (n = 16).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten consecutive sessions of bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation alone (therapy A) were compared vs a combination of10 consecutive sessions of bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with 12 non-consecutive sessions of motor imagery-based neurofeedback training (therapy B). Patients received both therapies (1-month washout period), in sequence AB or BA. Participants were assessed before and after each therapy and at 15-days follow-up, using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-upper limb, hand-grip strength, and the Nottingham Sensory Assessment as primary outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both therapies resulted in improved functionality and sensory function. Therapy B consistently exhibited superior effects compared with therapy A, according to Fugl-Meyer Assessment and tactile and kinaesthetic sensory function across multiple time-points, irrespective of treatment sequence. No statistically significant differences between therapies were found for hand-grip strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Following subacute and chronic stroke, integrating bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and motor imagery-based neurofeedback training has the potential to enhance functional performance compared with using bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation alone in upper limb recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":54768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10938141/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.18253","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the clinical effects of combining motor imagery-based neurofeedback training with bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for upper limb motor function in subacute and chronic stroke.

Design: Clinical trial following an AB/BA crossover design with counterbalanced assignment.

Subjects: Twenty individuals with subacute (n = 4) or chronic stroke (n = 16).

Methods: Ten consecutive sessions of bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation alone (therapy A) were compared vs a combination of10 consecutive sessions of bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with 12 non-consecutive sessions of motor imagery-based neurofeedback training (therapy B). Patients received both therapies (1-month washout period), in sequence AB or BA. Participants were assessed before and after each therapy and at 15-days follow-up, using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-upper limb, hand-grip strength, and the Nottingham Sensory Assessment as primary outcome measures.

Results: Both therapies resulted in improved functionality and sensory function. Therapy B consistently exhibited superior effects compared with therapy A, according to Fugl-Meyer Assessment and tactile and kinaesthetic sensory function across multiple time-points, irrespective of treatment sequence. No statistically significant differences between therapies were found for hand-grip strength.

Conclusion: Following subacute and chronic stroke, integrating bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and motor imagery-based neurofeedback training has the potential to enhance functional performance compared with using bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation alone in upper limb recovery.

双侧重复经颅磁刺激后基于运动想象的神经反馈训练对中风后上肢运动功能的影响:一项探索性交叉临床试验。
目的研究基于运动想象的神经反馈训练与双侧重复经颅磁刺激相结合对亚急性和慢性中风患者上肢运动功能的临床效果:临床试验,采用 AB/BA 交叉设计,平衡分配:20名亚急性(n = 4)或慢性中风(n = 16)患者:方法:20 名亚急性(n=4)或慢性中风患者(n=16)。方法:将连续 10 个疗程的双侧重复经颅磁刺激(A 疗法)与连续 10 个疗程的双侧重复经颅磁刺激和 12 个非连续疗程的运动想象神经反馈训练(B 疗法)进行比较。患者按 AB 或 BA 顺序接受两种疗法(1 个月的冲洗期)。在每次治疗前后和随访 15 天时,采用 Fugl-Meyer 评估--上肢、手握力和诺丁汉感觉评估作为主要结果测量指标,对参与者进行评估:结果:两种疗法都改善了患者的功能和感觉功能。根据 Fugl-Meyer 评估以及触觉和运动感觉功能,在多个时间点上,无论治疗顺序如何,B 疗法的效果始终优于 A 疗法。结论:在亚急性和慢性中风后,不同疗法之间的手握力差异无统计学意义:结论:在亚急性和慢性中风后,与单独使用双侧重复经颅磁刺激相比,整合双侧重复经颅磁刺激和基于运动图像的神经反馈训练有可能提高上肢恢复的功能表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
102
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine is an international peer-review journal published in English, with at least 10 issues published per year. Original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, special reports and letters to the editor are published, as also are editorials and book reviews. The journal strives to provide its readers with a variety of topics, including: functional assessment and intervention studies, clinical studies in various patient groups, methodology in physical and rehabilitation medicine, epidemiological studies on disabling conditions and reports on vocational and sociomedical aspects of rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信