The IndieTrainer system: a small-scale trial exploring a new approach to support powered mobility skill acquisition in children.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Lisa K Kenyon, John P Farris, Lindsey Veety, Brianna Kleikamp, Kara Harrington, Jennifer Jenkinson, Amanda Montgomery, Sango Otieno, Ian M Russell, Daniel K Zondervan
{"title":"The IndieTrainer system: a small-scale trial exploring a new approach to support powered mobility skill acquisition in children.","authors":"Lisa K Kenyon, John P Farris, Lindsey Veety, Brianna Kleikamp, Kara Harrington, Jennifer Jenkinson, Amanda Montgomery, Sango Otieno, Ian M Russell, Daniel K Zondervan","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2325563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The IndieTrainer system, consisting of a mobility device and video-based gamified training modules, was developed to assist children in attaining power wheelchair (PWC) skills. The purposes of this small-scale trial were to explore the use of the IndieTrainer system to provide PWC skills training and document parental satisfaction with the IndieTrainer system. We hypothesized that PWC skills training provided using the IndieTrainer system would result in improvements in both children's understanding of how to use a PWC and their PWC skill execution, and that parental satisfaction would be high. An open-label, single-arm trial was conduct as follows: (a) Baseline testing (T0); (b) A 3-week intervention consisting of two, 60-min-PWC skills training sessions per week; (c) Post-intervention testing (T1); and (d) A single session retention trial held 4 weeks after completion of the intervention (T2). Outcome measures included the Assessment of Learning Powered mobility use (ALP), Wheelchair Skills Checklist (WSC), Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), and Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8). 25 child/parent dyads participated. Between T0 and T1, statistically significant differences (<i>p</i>-value <.0001) with large effect sizes in mean ALP and WSC scores (ALP: <i>d</i> = 3.14; WSC: <i>d</i> = 3.25) and COPM performance and satisfaction scores (Performance: <i>d</i> = 4.66; Satisfaction: <i>d</i> = 3.24) were achieved. Mean T1 total CSQ-8 score was 31.52/32. At T2, all children maintained or improved their T1 ALP and WSC scores. This study provides initial support for the usability and feasibility of the IndieTrainer system. Futhermore, larger scaled studies using more rigorous research designs are indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"2953-2961"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2325563","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The IndieTrainer system, consisting of a mobility device and video-based gamified training modules, was developed to assist children in attaining power wheelchair (PWC) skills. The purposes of this small-scale trial were to explore the use of the IndieTrainer system to provide PWC skills training and document parental satisfaction with the IndieTrainer system. We hypothesized that PWC skills training provided using the IndieTrainer system would result in improvements in both children's understanding of how to use a PWC and their PWC skill execution, and that parental satisfaction would be high. An open-label, single-arm trial was conduct as follows: (a) Baseline testing (T0); (b) A 3-week intervention consisting of two, 60-min-PWC skills training sessions per week; (c) Post-intervention testing (T1); and (d) A single session retention trial held 4 weeks after completion of the intervention (T2). Outcome measures included the Assessment of Learning Powered mobility use (ALP), Wheelchair Skills Checklist (WSC), Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), and Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8). 25 child/parent dyads participated. Between T0 and T1, statistically significant differences (p-value <.0001) with large effect sizes in mean ALP and WSC scores (ALP: d = 3.14; WSC: d = 3.25) and COPM performance and satisfaction scores (Performance: d = 4.66; Satisfaction: d = 3.24) were achieved. Mean T1 total CSQ-8 score was 31.52/32. At T2, all children maintained or improved their T1 ALP and WSC scores. This study provides initial support for the usability and feasibility of the IndieTrainer system. Futhermore, larger scaled studies using more rigorous research designs are indicated.

IndieTrainer系统:一项小规模试验,探索支持儿童掌握动力移动技能的新方法。
IndieTrainer 系统由移动设备和基于视频的游戏化训练模块组成,旨在帮助儿童掌握电动轮椅(PWC)技能。本次小规模试验的目的是探索如何使用 IndieTrainer 系统提供 PWC 技能培训,并记录家长对 IndieTrainer 系统的满意度。我们的假设是,使用 IndieTrainer 系统提供的 PWC 技能培训将提高儿童对如何使用 PWC 的理解以及 PWC 技能的执行能力,而且家长的满意度也会很高。我们进行了如下开放标签、单臂试验:(a)基线测试(T0);(b)为期 3 周的干预,包括每周两次、每次 60 分钟的 PWC 技能培训课程;(c)干预后测试(T1);以及(d)干预结束 4 周后举行的单次课程保留试验(T2)。结果测量包括学习助力移动评估(ALP)、轮椅技能检查表(WSC)、加拿大职业表现测量(COPM)和客户满意度问卷-8(CSQ-8)。共有 25 个儿童/家长二人组参加。在 T0 和 T1 之间,差异有统计学意义(p 值 d = 3.14;WSC:d = 3.25),COPM 的表现和满意度得分也有统计学意义(表现:d = 4.66;满意度:d = 3.24)。T1 CSQ-8 总分的平均值为 31.52/32。在第二阶段,所有儿童都保持或提高了第一阶段的 ALP 和 WSC 分数。这项研究为 IndieTrainer 系统的可用性和可行性提供了初步支持。此外,还需要采用更严格的研究设计进行更大规模的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信