Efficacy of nab‑paclitaxel vs. Gemcitabine in combination with S‑1 for advanced pancreatic cancer: A multicenter phase II randomized trial.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Oncology Letters Pub Date : 2024-02-19 eCollection Date: 2024-04-01 DOI:10.3892/ol.2024.14293
Xi Guo, Wenhui Lou, Yaolin Xu, Rongyuan Zhuang, Lie Yao, Junwei Wu, Deliang Fu, Jun Zhang, Jing Liu, Yefei Rong, Dayong Jin, Wenchuan Wu, Xuefeng Xu, Yuan Ji, Lili Wu, Minzhi Lv, Xiuzhong Yao, Xiaowei Liu, Dansong Wang, Tiantao Kuang, Liang Liu, Wenquan Wang, Tianshu Liu, Yuhong Zhou
{"title":"Efficacy of nab‑paclitaxel vs. Gemcitabine in combination with S‑1 for advanced pancreatic cancer: A multicenter phase II randomized trial.","authors":"Xi Guo, Wenhui Lou, Yaolin Xu, Rongyuan Zhuang, Lie Yao, Junwei Wu, Deliang Fu, Jun Zhang, Jing Liu, Yefei Rong, Dayong Jin, Wenchuan Wu, Xuefeng Xu, Yuan Ji, Lili Wu, Minzhi Lv, Xiuzhong Yao, Xiaowei Liu, Dansong Wang, Tiantao Kuang, Liang Liu, Wenquan Wang, Tianshu Liu, Yuhong Zhou","doi":"10.3892/ol.2024.14293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) need a cost-effective treatment regimen. The present study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (AS) and gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) regimens in patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced PC. In this open-label, multicenter, randomized study named AvGmPC, eligible patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced PC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive AS (125 mg/m<sup>2</sup> nab-paclitaxel, days 1 and 8; 80-120 mg S-1, days 1-14) or GS (1,000 mg/m<sup>2</sup> gemcitabine, days 1 and 8; 80-120 mg S-1, days 1-14). The treatment was administered every 3 weeks until intolerable toxicity or disease progression occurred. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Between December 2018 and March 2022, 101 of 106 randomized patients were treated and evaluated for analysis (AS, n=49; GS, n=52). As of the data cutoff, the median follow-up time was 11.37 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 9.31-13.24]. The median PFS was 7.16 months (95% CI, 5.19-12.32) for patients treated with AS and 6.41 months (95% CI, 3.72-8.84) for patients treated with GS (HR=0.78; 95% CI, 0.51-1.21; P=0.264). The AS regimen showed a slightly improved overall survival (OS; 13.27 vs. 10.64 months) and a significantly improved ORR (44.90 vs. 15.38%; P=0.001) compared with the GS regimen. In the subgroup analyses, PFS and OS benefits were observed in patients treated with the AS regimen who had <i>KRAS</i> gene mutations and high C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (≥5 mg/l). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia, anemia and alopecia in the two groups. Thrombocytopenia occurred more frequently in the GS group than in the AS group. While the study did not meet the primary endpoint, the response benefit observed for AS may be suggestive of meaningful clinical activity in this population. In particular, promising survival benefits were observed in the subsets of patients with <i>KRAS</i> gene mutations and high CRP levels, which is encouraging and warrants further investigation. This trial was retrospectively registered as ChiCTR1900024588 on July 18, 2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":19503,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Letters","volume":"27 4","pages":"161"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10915801/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2024.14293","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) need a cost-effective treatment regimen. The present study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (AS) and gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) regimens in patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced PC. In this open-label, multicenter, randomized study named AvGmPC, eligible patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced PC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive AS (125 mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel, days 1 and 8; 80-120 mg S-1, days 1-14) or GS (1,000 mg/m2 gemcitabine, days 1 and 8; 80-120 mg S-1, days 1-14). The treatment was administered every 3 weeks until intolerable toxicity or disease progression occurred. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Between December 2018 and March 2022, 101 of 106 randomized patients were treated and evaluated for analysis (AS, n=49; GS, n=52). As of the data cutoff, the median follow-up time was 11.37 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 9.31-13.24]. The median PFS was 7.16 months (95% CI, 5.19-12.32) for patients treated with AS and 6.41 months (95% CI, 3.72-8.84) for patients treated with GS (HR=0.78; 95% CI, 0.51-1.21; P=0.264). The AS regimen showed a slightly improved overall survival (OS; 13.27 vs. 10.64 months) and a significantly improved ORR (44.90 vs. 15.38%; P=0.001) compared with the GS regimen. In the subgroup analyses, PFS and OS benefits were observed in patients treated with the AS regimen who had KRAS gene mutations and high C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (≥5 mg/l). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia, anemia and alopecia in the two groups. Thrombocytopenia occurred more frequently in the GS group than in the AS group. While the study did not meet the primary endpoint, the response benefit observed for AS may be suggestive of meaningful clinical activity in this population. In particular, promising survival benefits were observed in the subsets of patients with KRAS gene mutations and high CRP levels, which is encouraging and warrants further investigation. This trial was retrospectively registered as ChiCTR1900024588 on July 18, 2019.

纳布-紫杉醇与吉西他滨联合 S-1 治疗晚期胰腺癌的疗效对比:多中心 II 期随机试验。
晚期胰腺癌(PC)患者需要一种经济有效的治疗方案。本研究旨在比较纳布-紫杉醇加S-1(AS)和吉西他滨加S-1(GS)方案在化疗无效的晚期PC患者中的疗效和安全性。在这项名为AvGmPC的开放标签多中心随机研究中,符合条件的化疗无效晚期PC患者被随机分配(1:1)接受AS(125毫克/平方米纳布-紫杉醇,第1天和第8天;80-120毫克S-1,第1-14天)或GS(1000毫克/平方米吉西他滨,第1天和第8天;80-120毫克S-1,第1-14天)治疗。治疗每 3 周进行一次,直到出现不可耐受的毒性或疾病进展。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。2018 年 12 月至 2022 年 3 月期间,106 名随机患者中有 101 人接受了治疗并进行了分析评估(AS,n=49;GS,n=52)。截至数据截止日,中位随访时间为11.37个月[95%置信区间(CI),9.31-13.24]。AS治疗患者的中位PFS为7.16个月(95% CI,5.19-12.32),GS治疗患者的中位PFS为6.41个月(95% CI,3.72-8.84)(HR=0.78;95% CI,0.51-1.21;P=0.264)。与GS方案相比,AS方案的总生存期(OS;13.27个月对10.64个月)略有提高,ORR(44.90%对15.38%;P=0.001)显著提高。在亚组分析中,KRAS基因突变和C反应蛋白(CRP)水平较高(≥5 mg/l)的患者接受AS方案治疗后,PFS和OS均有获益。两组患者中最常见的≥3级不良反应是中性粒细胞减少、贫血和脱发。GS组血小板减少的发生率高于AS组。虽然这项研究没有达到主要终点,但在AS组观察到的反应获益可能表明在这一人群中存在有意义的临床活性。特别是在 KRAS 基因突变和 CRP 水平较高的亚组患者中观察到了令人鼓舞的生存获益,值得进一步研究。该试验于2019年7月18日回顾性注册为ChiCTR1900024588。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncology Letters
Oncology Letters ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
412
审稿时长
2.0 months
期刊介绍: Oncology Letters is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal, available in print and online, that focuses on all aspects of clinical oncology, as well as in vitro and in vivo experimental model systems relevant to the mechanisms of disease. The principal aim of Oncology Letters is to provide the prompt publication of original studies of high quality that pertain to clinical oncology, chemotherapy, oncogenes, carcinogenesis, metastasis, epidemiology and viral oncology in the form of original research, reviews and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信