Artificial intelligence-powered pharmacovigilance: A review of machine and deep learning in clinical text-based adverse drug event detection for benchmark datasets

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Yiming Li , Wei Tao , Zehan Li , Zenan Sun , Fang Li , Susan Fenton , Hua Xu , Cui Tao
{"title":"Artificial intelligence-powered pharmacovigilance: A review of machine and deep learning in clinical text-based adverse drug event detection for benchmark datasets","authors":"Yiming Li ,&nbsp;Wei Tao ,&nbsp;Zehan Li ,&nbsp;Zenan Sun ,&nbsp;Fang Li ,&nbsp;Susan Fenton ,&nbsp;Hua Xu ,&nbsp;Cui Tao","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The primary objective of this review is to investigate the effectiveness of machine learning and deep learning methodologies in the context of extracting adverse drug events (ADEs) from clinical benchmark datasets. We conduct an in-depth analysis, aiming to compare the merits and drawbacks of both machine learning and deep learning techniques, particularly within the framework of named-entity recognition (NER) and relation classification (RC) tasks related to ADE extraction. Additionally, our focus extends to the examination of specific features and their impact on the overall performance of these methodologies. In a broader perspective, our research extends to ADE extraction from various sources, including biomedical literature, social media data, and drug labels, removing the limitation to exclusively machine learning or deep learning methods.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted an extensive literature review on PubMed using the query “(((machine learning [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) Terms]) OR (deep learning [MeSH Terms])) AND (adverse drug event [MeSH Terms])) AND (extraction)”, and supplemented this with a snowballing approach to review 275 references sourced from retrieved articles.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In our analysis, we included twelve articles for review. For the NER task, deep learning models outperformed machine learning models. In the RC task, gradient Boosting, multilayer perceptron and random forest models excelled. The Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model consistently achieved the best performance in the end-to-end task. Future efforts in the end-to-end task should prioritize improving NER accuracy, especially for 'ADE' and 'Reason'.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings hold significant implications for advancing the field of ADE extraction and pharmacovigilance, ultimately contributing to improved drug safety monitoring and healthcare outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S153204642400039X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The primary objective of this review is to investigate the effectiveness of machine learning and deep learning methodologies in the context of extracting adverse drug events (ADEs) from clinical benchmark datasets. We conduct an in-depth analysis, aiming to compare the merits and drawbacks of both machine learning and deep learning techniques, particularly within the framework of named-entity recognition (NER) and relation classification (RC) tasks related to ADE extraction. Additionally, our focus extends to the examination of specific features and their impact on the overall performance of these methodologies. In a broader perspective, our research extends to ADE extraction from various sources, including biomedical literature, social media data, and drug labels, removing the limitation to exclusively machine learning or deep learning methods.

Methods

We conducted an extensive literature review on PubMed using the query “(((machine learning [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) Terms]) OR (deep learning [MeSH Terms])) AND (adverse drug event [MeSH Terms])) AND (extraction)”, and supplemented this with a snowballing approach to review 275 references sourced from retrieved articles.

Results

In our analysis, we included twelve articles for review. For the NER task, deep learning models outperformed machine learning models. In the RC task, gradient Boosting, multilayer perceptron and random forest models excelled. The Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model consistently achieved the best performance in the end-to-end task. Future efforts in the end-to-end task should prioritize improving NER accuracy, especially for 'ADE' and 'Reason'.

Conclusion

These findings hold significant implications for advancing the field of ADE extraction and pharmacovigilance, ultimately contributing to improved drug safety monitoring and healthcare outcomes.

Abstract Image

人工智能驱动的药物警戒:基于基准数据集的临床文本药物不良事件检测中的机器学习和深度学习综述。
目的:本综述的主要目的是研究机器学习和深度学习方法在从临床基准数据集中提取药物不良事件(ADEs)方面的有效性。我们进行了深入分析,旨在比较机器学习和深度学习技术的优缺点,特别是在与提取 ADE 相关的命名实体识别(NER)和关系分类(RC)任务框架内。此外,我们的重点还扩展到对特定特征及其对这些方法整体性能影响的研究。从更广阔的视角来看,我们的研究扩展到了从各种来源(包括生物医学文献、社交媒体数据和药物标签)中提取 ADE,从而消除了仅限于机器学习或深度学习方法的限制:我们使用查询"(((机器学习[医学主题词表(MeSH)术语])或(深度学习[MeSH术语]))"在PubMed上进行了广泛的文献综述。AND (药物不良事件 [MeSH 术语]))和(提取)",并辅以滚雪球的方法对检索到的文章中的 275 篇参考文献进行了审查:在分析中,我们纳入了 12 篇文章进行审查。在 NER 任务中,深度学习模型的表现优于机器学习模型。在 RC 任务中,梯度提升、多层感知器和随机森林模型表现出色。在端到端任务中,来自变压器的双向编码器表示(BERT)模型始终取得最佳性能。今后在端到端任务中应优先提高 NER 的准确性,尤其是 "ADE "和 "Reason":这些发现对推动 ADE 提取和药物警戒领域的发展具有重要意义,最终有助于改善药物安全性监测和医疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Journal of Biomedical Informatics 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信