Association of Intravenous Neostigmine and Anticholinergics or Sugammadex with Postoperative Delirium: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesia and analgesia Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000006939
Julian Rössler, Emily Abramczyk, Stephania Paredes, Nikola Anusic, Xuan Pu, Kamal Maheshwari, Alparslan Turan, Kurt Ruetzler
{"title":"Association of Intravenous Neostigmine and Anticholinergics or Sugammadex with Postoperative Delirium: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Julian Rössler, Emily Abramczyk, Stephania Paredes, Nikola Anusic, Xuan Pu, Kamal Maheshwari, Alparslan Turan, Kurt Ruetzler","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000006939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Administration of cholinesterase inhibitors in combination with anticholinergic drugs for reversal of neuromuscular blocks may precipitate delirium through impairment of central cholinergic transmission, which could be avoided by using sugammadex. Therefore, we tested the primary hypothesis that postoperative delirium is less common when neuromuscular block is reversed with sugammadex than with neostigmine combined with glycopyrrolate or atropine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study, analyzing all adult patients having general anesthesia for noncardiac surgery who received neostigmine or sugammadex from January 2016 to March 2022. Inverse propensity score weighting and propensity score calibration were used to adjust for appropriate confounders. Our primary outcome was presence of delirium within the first 4 days after surgery, defined as at least 1 positive brief Confusion Assessment Method (bCAM) screening. The secondary outcome was the presence of early delirium within 24 hours of surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 49,468 cases in our analysis, 6881 received sugammadex and 42,587 received neostigmine. After propensity weighting, the incidence of delirium was 1.09% in the sugammadex group and 0.82% in the neostigmine group. The odds of postoperative delirium did not differ between the sugammadex and neostigmine groups, with an estimated odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.33 (0.91-1.95), P = .147. A sensitivity analysis restricted to only include cases with at least 6 bCAM measurements over postoperative day (POD) 1 to 4 had consistent results, as sugammadex compared with neostigmine was associated with an estimated odds ratio for postoperative delirium of 1.20 (0.82-1.77), P = .346. Sugammadex was significantly associated with an increased incidence of early postoperative delirium, with an estimated odds ratio of 1.71 (1.07-2.72), P = .025. Further analysis showed no treatment-by-age interaction for either postoperative delirium ( P = .637) or postoperative early delirium ( P = .904).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to neostigmine, use of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular block was not associated with an increased risk of postoperative delirium in this retrospective single-center study. Though sugammadex was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of postoperative early delirium, the difference was small and not clinically relevant, and may reflect the presence of unknown confounders.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":" ","pages":"110-118"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000006939","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Administration of cholinesterase inhibitors in combination with anticholinergic drugs for reversal of neuromuscular blocks may precipitate delirium through impairment of central cholinergic transmission, which could be avoided by using sugammadex. Therefore, we tested the primary hypothesis that postoperative delirium is less common when neuromuscular block is reversed with sugammadex than with neostigmine combined with glycopyrrolate or atropine.

Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study, analyzing all adult patients having general anesthesia for noncardiac surgery who received neostigmine or sugammadex from January 2016 to March 2022. Inverse propensity score weighting and propensity score calibration were used to adjust for appropriate confounders. Our primary outcome was presence of delirium within the first 4 days after surgery, defined as at least 1 positive brief Confusion Assessment Method (bCAM) screening. The secondary outcome was the presence of early delirium within 24 hours of surgery.

Results: Among 49,468 cases in our analysis, 6881 received sugammadex and 42,587 received neostigmine. After propensity weighting, the incidence of delirium was 1.09% in the sugammadex group and 0.82% in the neostigmine group. The odds of postoperative delirium did not differ between the sugammadex and neostigmine groups, with an estimated odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.33 (0.91-1.95), P = .147. A sensitivity analysis restricted to only include cases with at least 6 bCAM measurements over postoperative day (POD) 1 to 4 had consistent results, as sugammadex compared with neostigmine was associated with an estimated odds ratio for postoperative delirium of 1.20 (0.82-1.77), P = .346. Sugammadex was significantly associated with an increased incidence of early postoperative delirium, with an estimated odds ratio of 1.71 (1.07-2.72), P = .025. Further analysis showed no treatment-by-age interaction for either postoperative delirium ( P = .637) or postoperative early delirium ( P = .904).

Conclusions: Compared to neostigmine, use of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular block was not associated with an increased risk of postoperative delirium in this retrospective single-center study. Though sugammadex was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of postoperative early delirium, the difference was small and not clinically relevant, and may reflect the presence of unknown confounders.

静脉注射新斯的明和抗胆碱能药或舒格迈得与术后谵妄的关系:回顾性队列研究
背景:胆碱酯酶抑制剂与抗胆碱能药物联合用于逆转神经肌肉阻滞可能会通过损害中枢胆碱能传导而诱发谵妄,而使用苏甘麦可避免这种情况。因此,我们测试了一个主要假设,即使用苏甘麦角逆转神经肌肉阻滞时,术后谵妄的发生率低于使用新斯的明联合甘珀酸或阿托品:我们进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究,分析了2016年1月至2022年3月期间所有接受新斯的明或苏格玛迪斯全身麻醉的非心脏手术成年患者。研究采用反倾向评分加权和倾向评分校准来调整适当的混杂因素。我们的主要结果是术后 4 天内出现谵妄,定义为至少 1 次简短意识模糊评估方法(bCAM)筛查阳性。次要结果是手术后 24 小时内出现早期谵妄:在我们分析的 49468 例病例中,有 6881 例接受了苏加麦司治疗,42587 例接受了新斯的明治疗。经过倾向性加权后,苏麦丁组的谵妄发生率为1.09%,新斯的明组为0.82%。术后谵妄的几率在苏加麦司组和新斯的明组之间没有差异,估计几率比(95% 置信区间)为 1.33 (0.91-1.95),P = .147。敏感性分析仅限于术后第 1 至 4 天 (POD) 至少进行了 6 次 bCAM 测量的病例,结果一致,与新斯的明相比,舒格迈地与术后谵妄的估计几率比为 1.20 (0.82-1.77),P = .346。舒格玛胺与术后早期谵妄发生率的增加明显相关,估计几率比为 1.71 (1.07-2.72),P = .025。进一步分析表明,治疗与年龄在术后谵妄(P = .637)或术后早期谵妄(P = .904)方面均无交互作用:结论:在这项回顾性单中心研究中,与新斯的明相比,使用苏甘麦克斯逆转神经肌肉阻滞与术后谵妄风险增加无关。虽然从统计学角度看,苏甘美与术后早期谵妄风险的增加有关,但差异很小,与临床无关,可能反映了未知混杂因素的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesia and analgesia
Anesthesia and analgesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信